Rawbeard said:
One review I saw mentioned that some of the kids watching actually turned to their parents asking how long that movie is midway through. So I guess kids do have too short an attention span to sit through a movie.
I watched the same review yesterday before seeing the movie last night, and as was mentioned in that review, it's really just one short part of the movie that slows down a bit before hammering the accelerator down for the (almost too fast, as Bob mentioned) last stretch of the movie.
Overall, I really enjoyed it, and my six-year old LOVED it. He asked if we could see it again as soon as the credits started rolling.
Evonisia said:
So if it does rush I find that a bit peculiar. Neither Frozen or Maleficent (two massive Disney hits of 2013/2014) were rushed. Hell Frozen even had padding in it with that damn second Troll scene. What convinced them that kids wouldn't pay attention when clearly they did for Frozen and Maleficent (and those weren't action films, mostly).
It definitely did seem a little rushed. Not terribly so, but it felt like it should have been about 10-15 mins longer. My only guess as to "Why?" is maybe that they think because it's a "Superhero movie" that kids will expect more action... or maybe Disney thinks boys have shorter attention spans than the girls that Frozen and Maleficent were more targeted towards?
Edit: Oh... and am I the only one who thinks Hiro's armor is strangely reminiscent of Priss's hardsuit?