Escape to the Movies: Godzilla - Breaking Kaiju

C.S.Strowbridge

New member
Jul 22, 2010
330
0
0
This basically what I've been hearing from everyone, including the positive reviews. The parts of Godzilla with Godzilla are amazing, but we spend too much time on boring humans.

I also agree with Movie Bob. Watching a movie that is almost great is much worse than watching a movie that is truly bad.
 

Almack

New member
May 1, 2012
94
0
0
tdylan said:
I think Pacific Rim knew what it was/wanted to be and it embraced it. How do you have a movie called "Godzilla," that barely features Godzilla? To Bob's credit, as he said, that worked for Jaws, but the reason it worked was because we didn't keep cutting to the police chief trying to get back to his wife and child while other people on the boats were hunting Jaws. Also, the only reason we got the Jaws movie that we did was because they couldn't make the shark swim correctly, or something to that effect, so they had no choice but to use it/show it less. Godzilla doesn't have that excuse. Based on the review, how little Godzilla is apparently in it, and how little he is seen, why even call it "Godzilla?" Why not call it "Kaiju Rising," or some other such nonsense, and make us say "man! Could you imagine if they made a Godzill movie with those effects?"
a movie without much godzilla in it being called godzilla you say? Well i might just have to draw your attention to this little know cult classic made in 1954 called Gojira you may have heard of it. Snarky ass comment aside if the shark in jaws had worked that movie may not be remember half as well as people do now, a movie that holds back the action will i think be remember longer than one that doesn't because that feeling of YES FINALLY AND IT IS GLORIOUS leaves a longer lasting impact. Coming back to pacific rim I enjoyed almost every moment of that movie but that movie climax's with 45 minutes still to go and by the end i was thrilled with what i had just seen but also completely exhausted.
 

Uriel_Hayabusa

New member
Apr 7, 2014
418
0
0
Is it just me or was this video in serious need of a spoiler warning? Maybe I missed it but Bob really does mention and discuss some pretty big chunks of the plot, particularly with the way the titular monster is characterized.
 

Sniper Team 4

New member
Apr 28, 2010
5,433
0
0
Kumagawa Misogi said:
Sniper Team 4 said:
Say it ain't so, Bob. Say it ain't so...

Why do movies feel they need to focus on the humans in these types of movies? It's the same thing that killed the Transformers movies. That is not what people go to these types of movies for. Humans should be the supporting B role in the stories, not front and center. Sigh...

Still going to go see this at least once, but I fear my expectations have been extremely lowered.
Because watching a monster vs monster battle for more than 15 minutes would get boring?
True, but the action should never take a back seat to the human characters. In Transformers 2 and 3, during the big battles, instead of showing us the robots fighting, it keeps focusing on Sam and his girlfriends running through the explosions while we see the robots fighting in the background. Go read the very first comment on this clip about how the action cuts to a little boy watching TV to see that this film is committing the same sin. Yes, humans need to be involved in these movies because otherwise it does get boring, but having the humans override everything else in these movies is never a good idea. Like I said, they are not the reason people go to see these types of movies.
 

Draconalis

Elite Member
Sep 11, 2008
1,586
0
41
I didn't even feel that the fight was all that good. Discounting that it was all at night and in a haze making it hard to focus on, everything felt like it was in slow motion and utterly underwhelming. All the angles were wrong, and what we did see was uninteresting.
 

medv4380

The Crazy One
Feb 26, 2010
672
4
23
Sounds like a classic Godzilla flic. He never gets much screen time until the End, and that's usually just for the fight. The Human story has always been on one side of crazy. Most of the build up is for who he's going to fight, and not him.

Really, had the 98 Godzilla been just as bad as it is, but had a real Godzilla it would have gotten a pass. The Sin of 98 was that it wasn't Godzilla. It was a monster Godzilla eats for breakfast.

As for motivation it's actually fairly simple. Why did the Wolves kill the Coyotes in Yellowstone? They didn't eat them. The Coyotes aren't a real threat. They just brutally murdered the coyotes. However, the Coyotes are a real predator that is in its territory. That's all the reason the Wolves needed. The same question can be posed as Why do we bother to kill Wolves? Whatever answer you give is why Godzilla goes after other monsters that show up. If you don't understand, or can't give a real answer then you fail to understand humans, and other predators. It's assumed that being human would mean that you'd know this, but that's not always the case I guess.
 

Jofe

New member
Feb 3, 2010
24
0
0
Bob thinks that if it weren't for all the other human characters, Godzilla would be a perfect monster movie.
So its sorta like the Transformers movies, where the human characters are more important that the beings that name the movie?

From the looks of it the whole thing is ruined by Hollywood's belief that audiences need a white male family man character to feel identified with or they won't go to watch the movie.
 

SnakeoilSage

New member
Sep 20, 2011
1,211
0
0
I get the feeling they were trying to make a franchise opener with this, that the point of this film is to pave the way for more films to come and we might never get that one completely awesome Godzilla film because they're driven to make sequels and a complete film can't have those.
 

Almack

New member
May 1, 2012
94
0
0
Uriel_Hayabusa said:
Is it just me or was this video in serious need of a spoiler warning? Maybe I missed it but Bob really does mention and discuss some pretty big chunks of the plot, particularly with the way the titular monster is characterized.
When bob doesn't really like a movie i think he tends to skip spoiler warnings.
 

tdylan

New member
Jun 17, 2011
381
0
0
medv4380 said:
Sounds like a classic Godzilla flic. He never gets much screen time until the End, and that's usually just for the fight. The Human story has always been on one side of crazy. Most of the build up is for who he's going to fight, and not him.

Really, had the 98 Godzilla been just as bad as it is, but had a real Godzilla it would have gotten a pass. The Sin of 98 was that it wasn't Godzilla. It was a monster Godzilla eats for breakfast.

As for motivation it's actually fairly simple. Why did the Wolves kill the Coyotes in Yellowstone? They didn't eat them. The Coyotes aren't a real threat. They just brutally murdered the coyotes. However, the Coyotes are a real predator that is in its territory. That's all the reason the Wolves needed. The same question can be posed as Why do we bother to kill Wolves? Whatever answer you give is why Godzilla goes after other monsters that show up. If you don't understand, or can't give a real answer then you fail to understand humans, and other predators. It's assumed that being human would mean that you'd know this, but that's not always the case I guess.
I didn't know about the wolves vs coyotes thing, but I'll give you that. That said, how does that work with regard to this film? Godzilla sees them as predators in his territory. Okay. What does Godzilla prey upon? After the wolves killed the coyotes, did they go back to their dens and fall asleep? The wolves themselves continued to hunt their prey, yes? And the wolves didn't migrated to Yellowstone because "coyotes are there. we need to kill them," right? Godzilla should have been stomping around doing Godzilla stuff until these guys showed up, and then went all "wolf on their coyote." I mean, tell me if I'm wrong. Was Godzilla in hibernation during the movie, and had to be "woken up?" If so, how was he "put back to sleep?"
 

Silverspetz

New member
Aug 19, 2011
152
0
0
Almack said:
tdylan said:
I think Pacific Rim knew what it was/wanted to be and it embraced it. How do you have a movie called "Godzilla," that barely features Godzilla? To Bob's credit, as he said, that worked for Jaws, but the reason it worked was because we didn't keep cutting to the police chief trying to get back to his wife and child while other people on the boats were hunting Jaws. Also, the only reason we got the Jaws movie that we did was because they couldn't make the shark swim correctly, or something to that effect, so they had no choice but to use it/show it less. Godzilla doesn't have that excuse. Based on the review, how little Godzilla is apparently in it, and how little he is seen, why even call it "Godzilla?" Why not call it "Kaiju Rising," or some other such nonsense, and make us say "man! Could you imagine if they made a Godzill movie with those effects?"
a movie without much godzilla in it being called godzilla you say? Well i might just have to draw your attention to this little know cult classic made in 1954 called Gojira you may have heard of it. Snarky ass comment aside if the shark in jaws had worked that movie may not be remember half as well as people do now, a movie that holds back the action will i think be remember longer than one that doesn't because that feeling of YES FINALLY AND IT IS GLORIOUS leaves a longer lasting impact. Coming back to pacific rim I enjoyed almost every moment of that movie but that movie climax's with 45 minutes still to go and by the end i was thrilled with what i had just seen but also completely exhausted.
You keep missing the Point, you CAN have a monster Movie that doesn't show the monster half the time, that works for suspense just fine. Here is the thing though, what you put on screen INSTEAD of the monster, has to be INTERESTING, and this is not. Brody doesn't even do stuff that are related to Godzilla during his segments. He just keeps trying to get back to his family who are just as boring as he is. Why is he even in the Movie? He doesn't have any skills that are related to the monsters or anything. His big thing is that he is a bomb-expert and he doesn't even deactivate the damn bomb. There is quite litterary NOTHING he does in the Movie that other characters couldn't have done just as well. And his Connection to Godzilla is marginal at best.
 

tdylan

New member
Jun 17, 2011
381
0
0
Almack said:
tdylan said:
I think Pacific Rim knew what it was/wanted to be and it embraced it. How do you have a movie called "Godzilla," that barely features Godzilla? To Bob's credit, as he said, that worked for Jaws, but the reason it worked was because we didn't keep cutting to the police chief trying to get back to his wife and child while other people on the boats were hunting Jaws. Also, the only reason we got the Jaws movie that we did was because they couldn't make the shark swim correctly, or something to that effect, so they had no choice but to use it/show it less. Godzilla doesn't have that excuse. Based on the review, how little Godzilla is apparently in it, and how little he is seen, why even call it "Godzilla?" Why not call it "Kaiju Rising," or some other such nonsense, and make us say "man! Could you imagine if they made a Godzill movie with those effects?"
a movie without much godzilla in it being called godzilla you say? Well i might just have to draw your attention to this little know cult classic made in 1954 called Gojira you may have heard of it. Snarky ass comment aside if the shark in jaws had worked that movie may not be remember half as well as people do now, a movie that holds back the action will i think be remember longer than one that doesn't because that feeling of YES FINALLY AND IT IS GLORIOUS leaves a longer lasting impact. Coming back to pacific rim I enjoyed almost every moment of that movie but that movie climax's with 45 minutes still to go and by the end i was thrilled with what i had just seen but also completely exhausted.
With regard to "Gojira," in all seriousness, I've never heard of it. I have no idea what that movie is, or what it's about. I'm assuming Kaiju, somehow.

We can speculate until the end of time about what Jaws could, or could not have been. We know what it is, and we know why it is. Again, it's because the build up to the reveal didn't revolve around a generic, cornfed, "all american" character "just trying to save his wife and kid(s)" when there are much bigger things at stake. "The needs of the many." A military man should exemplify that. Pacific Rim didn't hide the action from view. It reveled in it. They didn't cut to shots of humans bickering and battle planning each time the titans were about to come to blows. Pacific rim also showed restraint IMO: The fight in the harbor between Striker, Cherno, Crimson, Otachi, and Leatherback could have been a drawnout affair, but they got the 3 Jaegers out of the picture quickly in order to "up the stakes," but also make it easier to focus on the battle between Gypsy and the Kaiju. And you could see everything happening in the battle. You didn't need to wait until the end of the movie for glimpses of a fight, and Gypsy's male pilot wasn't desperately trying to get back home to save his non-descript wife and child. They tried to have that "family element" in the first Transformers movie as well, but I thank god they didn't go the "The battle is taking place WHERE? OMG! MY FAMILY IS THERE!" route.
 

10BIT

New member
Sep 14, 2008
349
0
0
tdylan said:
With regard to "Gojira," in all seriousness, I've never heard of it. I have no idea what that movie is, or what it's about. I'm assuming Kaiju, somehow.
"Gojira" is Godzilla's Japanese name, the title of the first Godzilla movie.
 

Ishal

New member
Oct 30, 2012
1,177
0
0
Said it before and I'll say it again.

Pacific Rim knew what it was, and did it's thing. It paid homage to all the stuff that influenced it, and didn't try to be something it's not. I walked away from Pacific Rim having had a blast. Now, if you asked me the character's names I couldn't tell you. I don't remember. What I do remember was the name of the very first Kaiju, "Knifehead." I remember that and the fights. That means the movie did it's job. So here we have a Godzilla movie advertised as such where he isn't in the movie even though he's painted as a "good guy." This movie has failed.

I don't care if you want to have characters and neat little arcs surrounding the action. Fine. But they are second tier compared to what should be the action. Also, the whole, monsters just fighting would have been boring garbage? Not if the people making the film are any good at their job.
 

Hindkjaer

New member
Sep 15, 2010
30
0
0
HOW CAN YOU NOT MENTION THIS!?!
The first time Gozilla, and the MOTU are having a fight, the movie cuts away! The ONLY part of this epic monster battle you get to see is through the "News cam" in the living room of Sgt. Borrings wife and son! The do this 2-3 times in total!

This was the absolutly biggest tease in monster movie history, and NOT the reason I went to see a Godzilla movie! The wait to get to the final fight was too long and, just as you said, the borring human caracters did not help.
 

Ashoten

New member
Aug 29, 2010
251
0
0
I blame whinny fans. Lets get one thing straight original Godzilla movies are boring for about 80 percent of the run time broken up with one fight half way through and another at the end. No seriously this is the kind of movie that fans could never be happy with no matter how faithful they tried to be to the source material. If they followed the same pacing as some of the earlier films people would complain it wasn't as action packed as Pacific Rim and boring. If they started out with Godzilla wrecking shit people would say the pacing was terrible and the movie blows its load to early.

Even as a kid renting VHS tapes from blockbuster I would fast forward through about half the movies. Don't even get me started on the 20 minuet long duel song by miniature twin island girl scene that is "Completely necessary" to wake up the other monster to help/fight Godzilla.

So what are executives and directors suppose to do with that? They throw in a bland every man characters that will appeal to the average person to project onto. They will be entertained enough by the action because of the spectacle and scope of the whole movie. Cause when all that the critics and fans do is complain you eventually tune it out and do whatever is the better business decision.

There is a time and a place to give constructive criticism and the squeaky wheel gets the grease but if all you do is squeak then you will get replaced.
 

vid87

New member
May 17, 2010
737
0
0
I'm not surprised by any of this considering the director's first film was also a giant monster movie where the actual monsters (and native Mexicans the plot was supposed to be thinly veiled metaphor for) are background noise to 2 uninteresting white people walking through jungles for 2 hours.
 

ecoho

New member
Jun 16, 2010
2,093
0
0
honestly im gonna go see this if its bad but with good parts I think its worth supporting so it gets a sequel that may do better. I mean there have been some bad movies that got better with sequels due to people expressing their opinion of what they liked and what they hated, while still going to the first movie.
 

DarkhoIlow

New member
Dec 31, 2009
2,531
0
0
I found the "human side" of things so clishee and boring that I went "get on with it" every time they showed Ford with his wife+son.

Only good things about this movie was the last 15minutes and Bryan Cranston..that's about it.