Warachia said:
MacNille said:
anthony87 said:
So fighting witches is misogynist now?
Didn't you know? every part of fiction where someone punch a women in the face is misogynist now! Punching a demon lady in the face as it trying to eat ya? Misogyny. Kill a women in an act of revenge because she killed your family? Misogyny.
edit. And if a women kills a man? It is not misandry. It just show her as a strong independent women.
In other news, Sleeping Beauty is the most offensive movie of all time, all the well meaning women are old, unattractive, or dead, Beauty (for being pretty of course) is cursed, and the main villain was a WITCH! HOW DARE THEY! Not to mention all of the women have to sit back and let the man in the movie take the spotlight despite doing all the work! Beauty is even saved by HIM!
Sleeping Beuty is pretty horribly offensive movie, though.
Going around kissing unconscious women who then have to repay this with sexual favours? Yeah, it's creepy and uncomfortable, and when I saw the movie as a kid I was vaguely offended, even though at the time I wasn't sure why.
Besides, I think lot of you are missing a point here.
All Bob says is that the whole thing makes him a bit uncomfortable, just like having a movie about slave owners heroically killing black people would.
And let's not forget the whole witch-hunt-idea is something that still happens, people are still being persecuted for being 'witches', and there are people arguing that persecuting people like that was justified to bring them Christianity.
FelixG said:
leviadragon99 said:
Huh... and now I can't unsee that uncomfortable mysoginist undertone...
It isnt misogynist though, Bob is just flat out wrong here.
I haven't seen this movie, but generally speaking, it depends on how it's handled.
If the violence against women is fetishised and they are little more than something for the man to save and how the violence affect them is just glossed over...
Not to mention that if the previously cabable fighter becomes suddenly weak so she can be victimised and saved...
Yeah, problematic.
tehweave said:
I can't be the only one who actually likes J.J. Abrahms.
(What's that? His movies make tons of money and sell tons of tickets at the box office? So I'm not the only one?)
It does seem to be a pretty common thing to poke fun at JJ's lens flare filmmaking. Yes, it's an annoying gimmick, but look past that and his movies are actually quite good. And anyone (I MEAN ANYONE) would be a better director than Lucas at this point.
Yeah, but my main issue is that I wouldn't like both Star Trek and Star Wars to have the same director. I had my issues with the 2009 Trek, but overall it was okay.
But I'd like Star Wars to be different. At least Lucas made interesting mistakes.