Well the only spoiler he really had was the one given in the announcement trailer. I get some people don't want to know ANYTHING about a movie before they go to see it, but why would they watch a review then?Ronack said:Once again you're encouraging us to just not see your video's. Now literally when you said "just go see it" instead of watching your review. How about you slap on a quick, one-minute review in front of the spoiler-parts where you discuss things more broadly before delving in to the specifics. Any half-decent reviewer should know how to do it, and you've been around so long you've probably passed half-decent a while ago. I'm positive you'll be able to do it.
Maybe your inability to see past the spoiler warning box also caused you not to listen to the intro of the episode. He does not just make videos to say that a movie is good or bad. That's subjective. He discusses movies. And sometimes that will include pieces of the movie that you don't want to hear about. If you don't want to discuss parts of the movie that you do not want to hear about, please stop coming to this forum to complain about it. It's getting rather annoying.Ronack said:Once again you're encouraging us to just not see your video's. Now literally when you said "just go see it" instead of watching your review. How about you slap on a quick, one-minute review in front of the spoiler-parts where you discuss things more broadly before delving in to the specifics. Any half-decent reviewer should know how to do it, and you've been around so long you've probably passed half-decent a while ago. I'm positive you'll be able to do it.
I'll stop this rant right there. You are opening the review expecting someone to say SOMETHING about the movie. Using this analogy, this is akin to asking someone if there is going to be a party. The sheer fact that you brought it up means you are looking for information. It's your own fault if you get annoyed that someone has spoiled the fact that there is actually a party.Grenge Di Origin said:So Bob's argument for giving away spoilers is because there's nothing interesting to talk about? What a lame and lazy excuse. See also: Film Crit Hulk's piece on writing reviews without spoiling (and also about Iron Man 3's reviews):
<quote=Film Crit Hulk>HECK, EVEN SAYING THE WORD "TWIST" SETS UP A DRAMATIC EXPECTATION THAT RENDERS THE AFFECTATION OF SURPRISE MEANINGLESS. YOU DON'T TELL SOMEONE THERE'S GOING TO BE A SURPRISE PARTY REGARDLESS IF YOU LEAVE OUT THE SPECIFICS.
Semantics. The first line in Bob's profile is that he is a film critic. To establish a proper critique, you must be able to discuss the content.Ronack said:Review =/= analysis