Escape to the Movies: The Dark Knight Rises

[Tono Makt]

Have you seen Prometheus? Rises actually reminds me a lot of Prometheus. Really, staggeringly well-made bits - I mean like, "wow" moments, and a hell of a lot of them = but stapled together not all that well. And thus I conclude that maybe, just maybe, Rises will redeem itself in the same way Prometheus may - in an extended edition Blu-ray release. It happened with Watchmen, too. I really feel like it just needs one or two more scenes to flesh some things out or improve the pacing, and wham! - near-perfect (if not perfect) film. I know you've not been very into this back and forth, but I'm interested to hear your opinion on this subject if nothing else?

That's an interesting comparison, between Rises and Prometheus. And uncomfortably close to the mark; I think overall Rises is a far superior film to Prometheus, but both had great expectations, and both failed to meet those expectations.

 

[Tormuse]

Just saw the movie last night and I'd say that Movie Bob was spot on with his analysis. It's good, but not great, (not as good as Dark Knight) has some serious pacing issues, puts a lot of effort into upping the stakes, but ultimately, leaves you feeling disappointed. (Also, it has some good, strong, intelligent female characters)

That final act was pretty insane, though.

 

[dayjack01]

I liked the movie but the only thing i didnt like was the lore for one bane is hispanic his mask doesant cover his mouth but thats design choice i dont remember bane being in the league of shadows at any point (hopefully someone will give an answer) Bane was born in blackgate not the pit and yes bane was born in the pit in the movie but the other person (no spoilers) was also born but it focuses on that person and im pretty sure bane is allot bigger than that

http://www.google.com/imgres?num=10&hl=es&safe=off&tbm=isch&tbnid=K9Gxbi15Nt-AGM:&imgrefurl=http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/early-reviews-dark-knight-rises-bane-high-marks-173841016.html&docid=14AFCfjdRJxvyM&imgurl=http://l3.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/p0w6rZ1pVsW9YHqNImglzw--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NTt3PTMwMw--/http://media.zenfs.com/en-US/blogs/movietalk/Bane-jpg_181056.jpg&w=303&h=456&ei=clscUImvJ6eV0QXV9ICgAw&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=745&vpy=225&dur=20&hovh=276&hovw=183&tx=117&ty=127&sig=118144716801371223290&page=1&tbnh=133&tbnw=93&start=0&ndsp=22&ved=1t:429,r:3,s:0,i:147&biw=1366&bih=676 Crappy Bane

http://www.google.com/imgres?num=10&hl=es&safe=off&tbm=isch&tbnid=Ld42QECos-Dp1M:&imgrefurl=http://www.mundoreturn.com/arte-conceptual-bane-chuck-dixon-doug-moench-graham-nolan-1993&docid=noFyLuIFIb8uFM&imgurl=http://www.mundoreturn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Bane2.jpg&w=500&h=668&ei=clscUImvJ6eV0QXV9ICgAw&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=969&vpy=303&dur=147&hovh=260&hovw=194&tx=107&ty=234&sig=118144716801371223290&page=1&tbnh=136&tbnw=121&start=0&ndsp=22&ved=1t:429,r:12,s:0,i:175&biw=1366&bih=676 Awesome Bane

 

[Uberpig]

Just watched it. Sigh...
So Bob, you go into a complete fan rage over The Amazing Spiderman, which had its flaws but was generally coherent and fun enough to pass the time, but say this bloated mess is good?
You said the Lizard's motivation made no sense, yet are fine with the nonsensical crap that passed for a villainous plot in TDKR.
You say the plot is good but let down by structure. The plot COULD have been good, yes. It wasn't. If you played a drinking game with this movie - where you had to take a shot every time there was a plot contrivance, an unlikely coincidence, a last-second save or a scene where characters just happen to meet each other - you'd die of alcohol poisoning.
Two hours and 40 minutes.
Worst movie I've seen in years.
One last point: the "bomb" (energy reactors do not work that way) deteriorated over five months, but our heroes only manage to get in a position to deactivate it when it's in its last minutes? Not only that, but it has a countdown clock that is precise TO THE SECOND when it was never designed as a bomb in the first place? Yep, sure...

 

[Farther than stars]

So Bob lauds everything but one thing so that means it'll be good.

If he totally loves it, it's probably not that great (if not worse). Read Sucker Punch.
If he totally hates it there's a good chance that it's better than it is. Read Amazing Spider-Man.

Got you figured, Bob-O, got you figured.

Dude... you got to give this eqaution a name, its that good.

I don't really think there is a formula to quantify a subjective view, since that's more inherent to objectivity. Of course a journalist should be as objective as possible, but in the end all writing has a subjective undertone (as well as the appreciation of that writing).

 

[Farther than stars]

One last point: the "bomb" (energy reactors do not work that way) deteriorated over five months, but our heroes only manage to get in a position to deactivate it when it's in its last minutes? Not only that, but it has a countdown clock that is precise TO THE SECOND when it was never designed as a bomb in the first place? Yep, sure...

I agree that using the whole "time bomb as a plot devise" was an example of terrible writing, but the thing that upset me the most was the use of stock imagery of New York for the wide-shots. I mean, you can so clearly see, from a couple of shots of Wall Street and Gramercy Park, that Gotham is supposed to be a parallel to Manhattan, whereas for me it always felt more like Chicago or maybe Brooklyn.
Those issues aside, I would say that the film is worth seeing if only for the performances of Anne Hathaway and Tom Hardy. And at least their characters had interesting backgrounds and motivations, but as Bob said, the whole thing lacks structure. The length alone indicates that they tried to cram too much into one movie and the editing reflects that, by not leaving enough space for the necessary pacing.

 

[Strazdas]

The problem with this movie was that the previous one was so good. It made peoples expectations unrealistically high.

 

[Extragorey]

MovieBob's review is nearly spot-on, but I have to disagree with how he interpreted Bruce Wayne's second "rise" to the role of Batman in the middle of the movie.
Because it wasn't a second rise at all, it was a continuation of the first. You see, it was established that even though Bruce donned the suit and punched up a few criminals, he never really reprised his role of The Batman. Not only was he physically majorly out of shape, but his heart just wasn't in it. That's why we got the whole "second rising" as MovieBob calls it, or rather the actual "rising" to the role of Batman.
In other words, Bruce Wayne's reprisal of the role of Batman at the beginning of the film was simply not the real deal - Nolan was trying to convey that the suit doesn't make the Bat. It was only after Bane drove him to the edge with the whole "watch Gotham burn" move that Batman truly resurfaced in Bruce.

On a side note, I loved the Killer Croc reference. It's like Nolan was just sneaking in his take on how ridiculous much of the comic book universe is.

 

[RTK1576]

Just saw TDKR, and this is all I will say:

Most of Bob's gripes are accurate, if somewhat exaggerated (as in the time jump presentation issue... not that bad). But this film is far from a disappointment. It works pretty well most of the time, and even seeing the flaws didn't detract from my enjoyment. Not as good as The Dark Knight, but still a pretty good film, and a fine closer to the Nolan Batman franchise.

 

[karamazovnew]

I've just seen the movie today and... wow... WTF did I just watch? Let's forget the first 2 movies (Nolan's) for a second. Let's suppose that you didn't even see them. Let's also suppose that you're used to seeing well structured and well edited movies (I had just rewatched Goodfellas the other day). If you're such a person, then this movie is BAAAAAAAAAD. I've had my share of stupid movies this year and Batman Rises takes the cake and eats it too. If you have the least bit of intelligence you'll know this to be true. No amount of extra deleted scenes can fix this mess (unless they deleted half the movie). It's that bad. It redefines my definition of a bad movie. It pushes The Mummy Returns from the top spot of the most idiotic movies I've seen to date (it was a melancholic honor anyway). Bad, Bad, Bad, Bad. And I respect Nolan, a lot. I loved Memento and The Prestige (and of course, The Dark Knight). I know he's capable of delivering well structured movies. But this one is anything but...

And just to get this off my mind... check spoiler.

Spoiler

1. How the heck does Wayne get back to the isolated city after his prison climb? Where did he get that leather jacket from?
2. Why on frackin Earth didn't Bane just keep the bomb hidden for 8 months and let it explode in an unsuspecting city? What was the fracking point?!!!!!!! Dumb dumb dumb dumb, dumbest story I've ever heard.

Look, I already knew the story inside out. I had read the reviews, spoilers and comments. So I knew what to expect story-wise. I was expecting to like it even more, since I knew the plot twists that had so many people dumbfolded. However, what nobody else pointed out, what Bob tried to say but kept it mostly low, is that all the rest is really poor film-making. I feel sorry for the people who made it, and especially for all those people stuck in traffic because of the roads closing to film this shit.