What's the rest, 1/8 badger? 0.oTherarchos said:Mostly Human
I have heard that Inuit is more offensive as Inuit only applies to one specific group of Eskimo whereas Eskimo is more of a group term.aba1 said:It is sorta true calling someone a Eskimo is like calling a Native American a Indian I don't think anyone would get seriously upset but it is rude and makes you look a little dumb (I'm Canadian).Mortai Gravesend said:Better lengthen that post just in case...Vault101 said:Inuit......Mortai Gravesend said:On the Internet you can be whatever you want. Like an Eskimo!
But fine if you want to say Inuit then call yourself Inuit. It's not like anyone will know the truth >__>
Though, btw, Wiki says the term 'eskimo' is sometimes used to refer to both the Inuit and some other group of people and tends to be considered pejorative in Canada and Greenland, but is used commonly in the lower 48 states of the US + Alaska.
Or if you're Romani. (Or Saami, there were some real racial tension in Lapland in the past, like in the 70's)BENZOOKA said:Finn.
We don't mention races around here. There's not even proper demographics on that. Unlike the North America, we neither pay attention to heritage (unless you've moved from another country and look more like, say Somalian, or something).
Mongolian blood is pretty common because of all the raping and pillaging they did; I've heard that a very large portion of the eastern European population has some Mongolian blood.MelasZepheos said:I'm caucasian.
I rarely explain further because I honestly don't know. Whenever we tried to explore my family tree we could only ever get as far back as my great-great grandparents on my father's side and my great grandparents on my mother's side.
However.
My grandfather had a specific blood type which was apparently Mongolian type A. Now he could only have inherited this from his father, and at the time it was very unlikely that someone with Mongolian blood would 'just happen' to be in Britain.
Added to this was the old family scandal of his name being Black-Reeve. Hyphenations in those days usually meant infidelity, and combined with the unusual blood type...
The joke is that he was really Tsarevich Alexei. Either that or Trotsky. or both.
Being is my background has a little bit of everything in it[footnote]Anglo-Saxon, Mongolian, Native american, African, an a little Arabic on my dad's side, I think[/footnote] I choose not to identify myself racially, lest I inadvertently anger the wrong ancestors.Andrewtheeviscerator said:So I'm taking Anthropology 150 this semester and its all about race and racism. On our first day we were asked what race we belong to. Many of the answers were all over the place, some people just said Canadian or white, while others went so far to say they identify themselves by their entire ancestry one even saying she was Canadian-Chinese-Thia-British-German-French. So it got me thinking, how do you identify yourself, if someone asks what you are or what race do you identify with what do you say? Do you go with your complete background, part of it, or just where you're from?