Indeed, why can I have sex with any willing woman but not pa... oh... wait... we're talking about something else... /shiftyeyesImthatguy said:One gets paid to do it and the other is doing it for shits and giggles.
Indeed, why can I have sex with any willing woman but not pa... oh... wait... we're talking about something else... /shiftyeyesImthatguy said:One gets paid to do it and the other is doing it for shits and giggles.
XD You bring up a good point but I think we can agree that using someones baser instincts to exploit them is wrong.DevilWithaHalo said:Indeed, why can I have sex with any willing woman but not pa... oh... wait... we're talking about something else... /shiftyeyesImthatguy said:One gets paid to do it and the other is doing it for shits and giggles.
Do I smell a petition starting?Frankster said:+1 Have buff guys with just a belt of ammo covering their privates for advertising shooter games to balance it all out.Oskuro said:I'm with the idea of, rather than banning, enforcing an equal amount of booth-studs.
It's what make the world go round. Food advertisements attempt to make you hungry. Beer commercials often tug at the pants of men. Advertising is exploitation. What's your target demographic and what are they interested in?Imthatguy said:XD You bring up a good point but I think we can agree that using someones baser instincts to exploit them is wrong.DevilWithaHalo said:Indeed, why can I have sex with any willing woman but not pa... oh... wait... we're talking about something else... /shiftyeyesImthatguy said:One gets paid to do it and the other is doing it for shits and giggles.
I think there's a difference between someone choosing to go to an expo dressed as a character, and girls being paid purely for the purpose of attracting lusty young men to their respective games. I think there is something a little seedy about using booth babes, but then, basically everything uses sex to advertise, so does it matter that this just happens to be a bit more "in the flesh" as opposed to a billboard or TV ad?Andy Chalk said:Is this really an issue? Because I have to say I find it a little odd that while the Eurogamer Expo makes such a big show of banning booth babes from its floor, it has no problem with scantily-clad "cosplayers," or posting pictures of them on its Facebook page [https://www.facebook.com/The.Eurogamer.Expo/photos_stream]. Is the woman in the photo above a booth babe or a cosplayer? And if you can't tell, then how do we determine where to draw the line - and why?
That's the thing. We are not children. We don't need booth babes. I am glad they are banned.Tenmar said:So, let's get this straight.
We will not allow men and women who aspire in their career to be models and building their portfolio and help earn a living and develop a career. Also, apparently due to how risky these models dress and given the demographic we must have it remain child friendly because someone must think of the children.
Yep it's official, the video game industry now has a religious right enforcing their morality.
There is a very firm difference between booth babes and cosplayers. Booth babes are the ones posing alongside the game boxes, attempting to promote or sell the game - basically they are getting PAID to be there, that is the most obvious difference I can think of.FelixG said:I figure if you are going to let in cosplayers you should hold them to the same standard as you would hold the companies with their employees.
What say a female employee is working on a new capcom Street Fighter game or such, and wants to dress as one of the more risqué characters (of her own free will)? Is she a boothbabe now because she is dressed sexily while promoting her game? or is she just a cosplayer at the expo?
So I will applaud them if they dont have a double standard and disallow any kind of sexyness, or just laugh at how stupid they are if they say its ok for X person to dress in sexy costume but not Y person.
Though to be fair, going through their facebook page, only one or two costumes had any amount of skin on display.