Exploration Team Discovers Mysterious Disc on Ocean Floor

Zenn3k

New member
Feb 2, 2009
1,323
0
0
What a loser, I hope this dude goes broke and loses his business, so someone with a bit more BALLS to actually check stuff out can take over.
 

algalon

New member
Dec 6, 2010
289
0
0
It's the Ark. Onboard is quite possibly the remains of a superweapon that could have changed the course of the war on Cybertron, or the remains of Shia's ex girlfriend.
 

keideki

New member
Sep 10, 2008
510
0
0
Vigormortis said:
Frankly, this "thing" is probably either a volcanic caldera, or some piece of World War II debris or shipwreck. I can guarantee it's not a flying saucer or some other such nonsense.

Impact trail? Please. Has it occurred to anyone that having an "impact trail" that long, that far down under the surface is virtually impossible? And, even if this "thing" had the velocity to go that deep and still retain enough speed to make such a trail, it would likely have disintegrated upon impact with the water.

Besides, that "trail" looks more like a volcanic ridge or the like and not like something made by an "impact".

keideki said:
When I look at this, the only thing I can think of is this book.

http://www.amazon.com/Sphere-Michael-Crichton/dp/0062044915/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1312399371&sr=1-1
So...it's probably not a good idea to send Samuel Jackson and Dustin Hoffman to go figure out what it is, right?

You know, it's funny. When I first heard this story, that was my first thought as well. I immediately asked the person who told me the story, "Was anyone at the site attacked by a giant squid?"
Frankly I feel that not enough people are really enjoying that connection. I talked to a couple well read friends of mine and neither really got the joke. Which is funny because most of them claimed to be Michael Crichton fans.
 

Noswad

New member
Mar 21, 2011
214
0
0
At this point I'm split into two halves. One halve, the side that convinces me never to buy a lottery ticket, is saying its a bit of old ship or a odd shaped rock and it's a waste off time even considering it. Then there's the other halve that makes my heart jump every time I hear news like this, a tiny flicker of hope that see's a future where humans are not condemned to die slowly on the planet that created us but take our place among the infinitely wonderful. Unfortunately I know where the smart money lay.
 

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,667
0
0
thegrimfandango said:
It would cost a LOT of money, to hire a research vessel kitted out with everything you need, pay a crew, pay scientists who will actually be able to look at the data and analyse it, pay for qualified divers and all the equipment & safety procedures they need - and if it's deep sea below where divers can reach then we're talking about throwing something like an ROV (remotely operated vehicle) into the mix, and those things do not come cheap and tend to have delicate equipment. And that's not even getting into the physical/technical problems with trying to sample, film and gather definitive data on something in the pitch black under immense pressure. Trust me, it's nowhere near as simple as just getting a boat and sending some people down, and you'd want to be a wealthy individual to privately fund it. Maybe if they got a research grant, but there'd have to be a body with the funds and interest to pay for the expedition, and it's really hard to get funded in a scientific endeavour these days without obvious moneymaking petential :(.
Sorry about the wall-o-text, but Marine Science is my arena of study, and it's really not simple to get good data on anything going on under the water.

Its only 285 feet down, it is easily divable seeing the North Sea oil rig divers go down to 700ft in more open waters than the Baltic.
Vigormortis said:
Frankly, this "thing" is probably either a volcanic caldera, or some piece of World War II debris or shipwreck. I can guarantee it's not a flying saucer or some other such nonsense.

Impact trail? Please. Has it occurred to anyone that having an "impact trail" that long, that far down under the surface is virtually impossible? And, even if this "thing" had the velocity to go that deep and still retain enough speed to make such a trail, it would likely have disintegrated upon impact with the water.

Besides, that "trail" looks more like a volcanic ridge or the like and not like something made by an "impact".
Ok its at least 1500 miles to the nearest active volcano from the Baltic and the area has not been tectonically active for millions of years. Plus the small but important point its to small to be ridge seeing its in only 285 feet of water. The force of gravity still operates under water. If you drop 5 tons of iron over the side of ship it is still going to fall, in this case, 285 feet, which means its going hit big. When the Titanic hit the ocean bed it dug itself 50 feet below the ocean bed after falling 2 miles in six minutes. All that said and done its mostly likely to be a bit of heavy deck cargo that has been washed over board.
 

Frotality

New member
Oct 25, 2010
982
0
0
how can this guy not want to investigate? he is clearly an alien in disguise trying to cover up his crashed ship, because basic human curiosity cannot find a geometric anomaly in a crater at the bottom of the ocean and go, "eh...not interested". i can understand not having/ wanting to spend the time and money needed for what might be nothing, but you have to at least WANT to see what it is...

anyway, despite obviously looking like the result of han solo drunk-driving, im gonna say its the remains of a giant prehistoric crab; seems more plausible. hopefully a different team of treasure hunters (perhaps one not lead by an inhuman pod person) will give it a looksie.
 

Random berk

New member
Sep 1, 2010
9,636
0
0
Wow, it really does look like the Millenium Falcon. Its probably nothing more excciting than a meteor, which as a geologist I really should be more excited about than I am, but it'd still be cool to send down a submersible and find out what it really is.
 

Quaxar

New member
Sep 21, 2009
3,949
0
0
Clearly, this is a copy from a New Republic Starfleet Academy information about why you should never let your Wookie co-pilot maneuver the ship alone in close vicinity to big galactic bodies.

Look at it, you can almost still read the words "Friends don't let friends co-pilot alone" scribbled over it!
 

mikev7.0

New member
Jan 25, 2011
598
0
0
TestECull said:
Cpu46 said:
The resemblance is uncanny however if you look at the picture you can see the impact tracks they mentioned. It looks like the Falcon crashed backward. And anyways the disk is 20 feet too small to be the Falcon.

Myth Busted!
Maybe the Falcon is the Porsche 911 of the Star Wars universe? Prone to spinning out and backing into things? Many a 911 has spun off, if the Falcon behaves similarly then the ass-backwards positioning related to those tracks fits beautifully.
Then factor Captain Solo's "natural piloting skills" into that and it all comes together!

I cannot understand why no one has taken a closer look at something submerged only 285 ft!

Maybe it crashed while refueling? I mean we're looking to Hydrogen for power now and have been for awhile so it's not unthinkable to reason that something beat us to the punch by a few hundred or thousand years right?
 

JET1971

New member
Apr 7, 2011
836
0
0
Why would they need to use divers? There is absolutly no need to use divers and spend millions of dollars to send people down to it to find out what it is when a few thousand dollars and a remote controled mini sub would be just as good. Funny the remote sub would be sent first even if they were planning on sending divers anyway and he probably already had one on his ship anyway.

Soooooo that being said why didnt they send a remote sub to check it out? Wait maybe they did and it was really a space craft so they reported it and they were shut down. but since they already told someone they spotted something unusual they are being forced by penalty of death to claim its nothing of interest really and would be too expensive to go down and look at it.
 

Cpu46

Gloria ex machina
Sep 21, 2009
1,604
0
41
uppitycracker said:
Cpu46 said:
uppitycracker said:
i know i'm not hte first one to say it or think it, but.....
The resemblance is uncanny however if you look at the picture you can see the impact tracks they mentioned. It looks like the Falcon crashed backward. And anyways the disk is 20 feet too small to be the Falcon.

Myth Busted!
my god, and i thought i was a geek :p hahaha i kid, perhaps it's an earlier prototype of the falcon!
Wookieepedia is my friend. Also about ten years of my early life was devoted to everything Star wars.

My nerdy star wars knowledge wants to point out that there really was no Prototype Falcon. It is a modified YT-1300 light freighter.


Oh, and the Ebon Hawk from KOTOR is closer to the dimensions of the disk, but still about 10 feet wider.