Frankly I feel that not enough people are really enjoying that connection. I talked to a couple well read friends of mine and neither really got the joke. Which is funny because most of them claimed to be Michael Crichton fans.Vigormortis said:Frankly, this "thing" is probably either a volcanic caldera, or some piece of World War II debris or shipwreck. I can guarantee it's not a flying saucer or some other such nonsense.
Impact trail? Please. Has it occurred to anyone that having an "impact trail" that long, that far down under the surface is virtually impossible? And, even if this "thing" had the velocity to go that deep and still retain enough speed to make such a trail, it would likely have disintegrated upon impact with the water.
Besides, that "trail" looks more like a volcanic ridge or the like and not like something made by an "impact".
So...it's probably not a good idea to send Samuel Jackson and Dustin Hoffman to go figure out what it is, right?keideki said:When I look at this, the only thing I can think of is this book.
http://www.amazon.com/Sphere-Michael-Crichton/dp/0062044915/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1312399371&sr=1-1
You know, it's funny. When I first heard this story, that was my first thought as well. I immediately asked the person who told me the story, "Was anyone at the site attacked by a giant squid?"
thegrimfandango said:It would cost a LOT of money, to hire a research vessel kitted out with everything you need, pay a crew, pay scientists who will actually be able to look at the data and analyse it, pay for qualified divers and all the equipment & safety procedures they need - and if it's deep sea below where divers can reach then we're talking about throwing something like an ROV (remotely operated vehicle) into the mix, and those things do not come cheap and tend to have delicate equipment. And that's not even getting into the physical/technical problems with trying to sample, film and gather definitive data on something in the pitch black under immense pressure. Trust me, it's nowhere near as simple as just getting a boat and sending some people down, and you'd want to be a wealthy individual to privately fund it. Maybe if they got a research grant, but there'd have to be a body with the funds and interest to pay for the expedition, and it's really hard to get funded in a scientific endeavour these days without obvious moneymaking petential .
Sorry about the wall-o-text, but Marine Science is my arena of study, and it's really not simple to get good data on anything going on under the water.
Ok its at least 1500 miles to the nearest active volcano from the Baltic and the area has not been tectonically active for millions of years. Plus the small but important point its to small to be ridge seeing its in only 285 feet of water. The force of gravity still operates under water. If you drop 5 tons of iron over the side of ship it is still going to fall, in this case, 285 feet, which means its going hit big. When the Titanic hit the ocean bed it dug itself 50 feet below the ocean bed after falling 2 miles in six minutes. All that said and done its mostly likely to be a bit of heavy deck cargo that has been washed over board.Vigormortis said:Frankly, this "thing" is probably either a volcanic caldera, or some piece of World War II debris or shipwreck. I can guarantee it's not a flying saucer or some other such nonsense.
Impact trail? Please. Has it occurred to anyone that having an "impact trail" that long, that far down under the surface is virtually impossible? And, even if this "thing" had the velocity to go that deep and still retain enough speed to make such a trail, it would likely have disintegrated upon impact with the water.
Besides, that "trail" looks more like a volcanic ridge or the like and not like something made by an "impact".
YOU MEAN METAL GEAR!?!?cyrogeist said:it might be a military black project...you never know.
Then factor Captain Solo's "natural piloting skills" into that and it all comes together!TestECull said:Maybe the Falcon is the Porsche 911 of the Star Wars universe? Prone to spinning out and backing into things? Many a 911 has spun off, if the Falcon behaves similarly then the ass-backwards positioning related to those tracks fits beautifully.Cpu46 said:The resemblance is uncanny however if you look at the picture you can see the impact tracks they mentioned. It looks like the Falcon crashed backward. And anyways the disk is 20 feet too small to be the Falcon.
Myth Busted!
Wookieepedia is my friend. Also about ten years of my early life was devoted to everything Star wars.uppitycracker said:my god, and i thought i was a geek hahaha i kid, perhaps it's an earlier prototype of the falcon!Cpu46 said:The resemblance is uncanny however if you look at the picture you can see the impact tracks they mentioned. It looks like the Falcon crashed backward. And anyways the disk is 20 feet too small to be the Falcon.uppitycracker said:i know i'm not hte first one to say it or think it, but.....
Myth Busted!