Radoh said:
Well I don't know about this bit, since it seems like it's kind of a lie to me.
Of course it was a lie lol. I don't associate myself with people who talk about others in private messages and say they "unleashed" something on a forum. That's pretty petty.
I am not at all ashamed to admit that I'm the one that PMed Adam about you, since your first post was in one of my threads.
If you're not ashamed, then why did you do it in PM? Do I know you? Did we meet ANYWHERE before on the internet or otherwise? Did we ever chat? No? It's also funny how you think that you're somehow responsible for me. I guess birds of a feather....you know the rest.
So far what, 90+% of your posts have been bashing Ezio, so you decide to finally make your own thread dedicated to making up a theory that expands further on your hatred of him but somehow ignores the other assassins we've been playing as.
My god, people, stop exaggerating and being so dramatic. I don't "hate" Ezio. I like Ezio but I don't think he's the god everyone thinks he is. I'm sorry if that somehow hurt your feelings, I really am.
Nope, I did not ignore the others. I actually said how this can apply to Connor's view of Charles and how he seemed like a nice guy with Haytham but then shown to be a racist douche when we saw Charles through Connor. You're also forgetting the fact that Altair's and Connor's villains were not one dimensional, mustache twislers nor were other historical characters around them dumbed down to make them look smarter. That's why i thought of this theory because it does not make sense for characters such as Bartolomeo to be as idiotic as he had been portrayed, when in AC II, and in real life, he was a pretty capable military tactician.
You realise that if your theory has any kind of accuracy to it (read this as none at all), then Altair, Connor, Edward, Haytham, Avelin, and probably Arno will all suffer from the same discrepancies.
You realize that I already stated that this theory is most likely NOT what the writers thought of? and how I admitted that i'm probably giving the writers too much credit? This is just a possible explanation to how Ezio was suddenly so smart while everyone else was suddenly so dumb.
You say that Ezio's subjective viewpoint somehow makes him less viable to believe than the others, but that's not backed up BY YOUR OWN THEORY.
It kind of is, like I said...no other protagonists had historical characters around them dumbed down.
Seriously, you should probably just cool it on the Ezio hate.
You keep thinking it's hate, good for you. I'm pretty cool so far, it's all the butthurt people here barging in telling me that they know better for some reason and that I should bow down to whatever they say and then when I DON'T bow down, they throw hissy fits and flail around.
This whole PM thing is making me wonder--Gee, I wonder what they're saying about me behind my back, I wonder how much they're insulting or demeaning just because I dislike a fictional character that they like...it's pretty petty when you think about it.
