Samantha Burt said:If the kid is buying a prepaid card with their own money, then it's not really an issue. Otherwise, it's still the parents' fault.
Mixed Signals?Mr.Pandah said:Yes they can, but that also means they're using money to buy said cards...and whom are they getting the money from that makes it a big deal in the first place?
How is any of this mixed signals?jdogtwodolla said:Samantha Burt said:If the kid is buying a prepaid card with their own money, then it's not really an issue. Otherwise, it's still the parents' fault.Mixed Signals?Mr.Pandah said:Yes they can, but that also means they're using money to buy said cards...and whom are they getting the money from that makes it a big deal in the first place?
If the child is taking money or purchasing without parental consent then I can see it as an issue for the parents. The article didn't really elude to that possibility though, Just credit cards. Maybe I'm missing how this process works.
No no no, what I was saying is that The wording excluded the Redeem Cards and Only talked about the Credit based payment. I know It's all without parental consent and that that is the real issue. Maybe I just let that bug me too much.Mr.Pandah said:The article is entirely about the fact that kids can just purchase points without true parental consent and that it is too easy for them to do so. Regardless of where they get these "credits" from is besides the point. And yes the article did elude to there being some purchases without parental consent...or else there wouldn't be much of a case, now would there?
Ah okay. I gotcha now. Yay misunderstanding!jdogtwodolla said:No no no, what I was saying is that The wording excluded the Redeem Cards and Only talked about the Credit based payment. I know It's all without parental consent and that that is the real issue. Maybe I just let that bug me too much.Mr.Pandah said:The article is entirely about the fact that kids can just purchase points without true parental consent and that it is too easy for them to do so. Regardless of where they get these "credits" from is besides the point. And yes the article did elude to there being some purchases without parental consent...or else there wouldn't be much of a case, now would there?
Also the signals thing was about the two points counteracting each other, She saying the redeem points aren't much of an issue in this situation. You saying they are, especially not without consent.
The amount of times i have bought crap with in my bank account is ridiculous. Transformers Figures, Acorns on Ice Age Village for the ipod (only 30 at a time for £1.49, but still) and not to mention the amount of crap i eat day in and day out, admittedly i am 20, so i can do what i want, but if you trust your kid with his/her own Bank Account, then suddenly sue a company because of what the kid bought, you obviously didn't have trust in your kid to begin with, ergo, don't get him/her a fucking back account -.-UnderGlass said:I'm not sure if this is a misquote or if I'm just reading it wrong but it sounds like she's upset that minors are making purchases with their own accounts. If it's against the law in CA then fine, I guess, maybe her 'damages' were to get her son out of the hole. Still, young adults wasting their own money on crap is hardly earth-shattering stuff.Andy Chalk said:Bohannon filed the action [http://www.scribd.com/doc/90357135/Facebook-Credits-Removal] on behalf of herself, her minor son and "all others similarly situated," and is seeking to represent "all parents and legal guardians whose minor children allegedly made unauthorized purchases of Facebook credits from the minor's account." The suit alleges a belief that there are "thousands of members of the Class" and while it doesn't demand a specific dollar figure in damages or restitution, Bohannon's personal damages are pegged at "several hundred dollars." The suit also notes that in 2011 alone, Facebook users between the ages of 13 and 17 purchased more than $5 million worth of credits.
Minors aren't deemed able to make financial transactions on their own, so in this case the right of the parent wouldn't be to blame the shop, but to declare the transaction (the buying of the kitkat) null and void.Vrach said:And this is pretty much like suing the shop when your kid grabs money out of your wallet and goes to buy himself a Kit-Kat. If your child took money from you without your knowledge, the problem does not lie in anyone but your own stupid, incompetent self, something you only prove further by blaming someone else for it.
Really? Cause I haven't in my entire life heard of such thing. They are perfectly able to make financial transactions on their own, what they're not able to do (afaik) is have a credit card (on their own), because that requires being an adult (perhaps it's possible with the signature of one, which, if it's the case, makes this lawsuit even more preposterous). You're saying any parent can walk into a store any underage person went into and bought something and demand their money back, that's just straight up bullshit.Kargathia said:Minors aren't deemed able to make financial transactions on their own, so in this case the right of the parent wouldn't be to blame the shop, but to declare the transaction (the buying of the kitkat) null and void.Vrach said:And this is pretty much like suing the shop when your kid grabs money out of your wallet and goes to buy himself a Kit-Kat. If your child took money from you without your knowledge, the problem does not lie in anyone but your own stupid, incompetent self, something you only prove further by blaming someone else for it.
1. The parent has raised the child in such a manner that the child feels it's ok to STEAL from the parent - really think about the severity of this. Put yourself in the situation of that parent and imagine telling your friends "my child stole money from me today" - the parents I know, including my own, would be embarrassed as all hell by their child's action.Kargathia said:And on another note: sueing a company because your kid did something he shouldn't have certainly reeks of bad parenting, but so far that smell is all we have to go on.
She might possibly be an awful parent, but conclusively stating such when you don't know anything beyond that she sued definitely makes you a douche.