I'm shocked and surprised at this article - I thought The Escapist was better than this.
First of all, Yug isn't a qualified legal practitioner, as would be patently obvious had you asked him his background. His dispensing legal advice is not only negligent, it's downright dangerous.
Secondly, his advice is incorrect. Dangerously so - the Australian Attorney General has made it very clear that importation of RC classified goods into Australia is treated as importation of restricted goods and is an offence against the Customs Act as recently as last year:
http://www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/rwpattach.nsf/VAP/(CFD7369FCAE9B8F32F341DBE097801FF)~aP0000CPBInformation+for+Importation++Comments+from+Customs+29+June+2007.PDF/$file/aP0000CPBInformation+for+Importation++Comments+from+Customs+29+June+2007.PDF
Thirdly, this would have been very obvious had you done the 10 minutes of research required. The Australian Customs site makes it very clear, as does the Attorney General. The Customs Act also makes it clear that importation of restricted goods carries a penalty.
I'm not a lawyer, and this is most definitely not legal advice. However, it's also very clear that the situation isn't anywhere near as friendly as Yug makes out. Anyone who decides to import a restricted good into Australia does so at their own risk - while he's probably correct that there's no jail time (that's reserved for importation of narcotic goods which carries absolute liability), he's not correct in implying that it's free of penalty.
This is journalism of the poorest sort. 'Firing off an email' on a legal issues and reporting the results as fact? Not very professional, Escapist.