I'm not so bothered about having to pay for it so much as having to wait until mid-next year for it. [Edit: Well, this is a slight exaggeration. March 2009, possibly later in case of delay.]GloatingSwine said:
Hard to say. Broken Steel is a "mop up what's left of the Enclave" scenario, and apparently it's actually going to change the ending of the game so you survive to do so, while raising the level cap, ect. Presumably, it'll have a big 4-hour long pitched combat scenario that is leveraged in as the end-game conflict. What it needs is a better Ron Pearlman recap, but it's hard to say if we'll get it.Indigo_Dingo said:
Seeing how they're pretty much disclosed they're changing the ending, it's entirely possible that they decided that we can survive going into the chamber ourselves (or got Fawkes/Charon/Mr. Handy to do it), and perhaps that spiking the water has a gradual effect.Indigo_Dingo said:
Morally? Absolutely. However, practically? The trouble is, the developer's time is already booked making DLC, unless we could make it worth Bethesda's time there's no way they'd ever get around to fixing the ending. After all, it wasn't a bug, it was a design decision. This DLC idea is sort of he best of both worlds - the developers get their money, we get our fixed ending, and they were able to talk their bosses into it under the precedent that they were making the DLC anyway.Indigo_Dingo said:
Yes, and it would have been nice if the Exxon Valdez didn't dump all the oil in the ocean. However, now that this has happened, we can at least hope somebody will come along to clean it up.Indigo_Dingo said:
