Fallout 3 review

Zackary Yakumo

New member
Mar 29, 2010
306
0
0
Story:

The fallout series was, in itself, a story. I read the back history before playing any of the games and, to be honest, it seems like something written out of a book. Set in a dimension similar to ours, The events of the fallout series are placed after 200 years of a Nuclear war , mainly between USSA (formerly the USA) and China. The war lasted no more than two hours, but the effects will last forever. I could rattle off the history for you here, but you can actually read it yourself at

http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Timeline.

Fallout 3 starts of, like the first game, in a giant underground bunker, known as a vault. This vault is Vault 101, and to be blunt its full of total jerks! You really start off when you wake up quite abruptly one day to be informed that your dad ran away, his assistant was killed, and the security wants you dead. Well, after multiple killings, we reach the vault door. Open it, go to the wooden door, and then a screen appears, practically asking? were you dissatisfied with your life as a child? Make some changes here.? Afterwards, you go on a search for your father. I seriously think your character just wants to sleep with daddy because their scared of the evil super mutants.

End Score: 30/100

Leveling and Karma:
As all rpgs, you must level up, usually by doing quests to get experience. But no, you can get experience by killing civilians. Sounds awesome, right? Wrong. You get bad karma, and karma is very important in this game. You see, Good karma means civilians will like you and, sometimes, give you free items. there are three karma types: Good karma, neutral karma, and bad karma. Bad karma means people will dislike you, neutral means you?re nobody to them, and goods karma means you are almost a god to these idiots. You get karma choices straight from the vault, with the choice of killing the vault?s overseer or talking like a goody-to-shoes. Trust me, although you get more experience being bad, its better to be good?. except for some parts. but, like all things, the choice in this game isn?t that great. mainly every discussion boils down to three choices: good, bad, or in-between. Seriously guys, Im gonna give my life-savings to the company that can make a game with more choices that good, bad, or neutral. And that means never.

End score: 50/100

Music and soundtrack:
Music selection in this game is awesome! That?s the only way to describe. Now, I am a major fan of old American classics, and this game provides like no other. As soon as you ?discover? Galaxy News Radio, turn it on and the game turns golden. There are other stations, such as the enclave, but the only good one is Galaxy News Radio. The music is great, not only the radio but also the background music. Turn off the radio and music hits in at all the right places. Get into a suspicious or dangerous area and the mysterious music plays.

End score: 100/100

Sounds / voices:

I include the category of sounds because of this: Most games with guns have fake gun sounds. Not much difference here. I mean, im pretty sure if I go and fire up a minigun its going to, first of all, rumble. There is definitely going to be some shaking. Secondly, im pretty sure its not going to be a small mechanical whir. Im pretty sure its going to be some loud crap. I understand you don?t want to include rumbling feature when your firing a gun or the loud sound of a minigun going off, but answer me this: why does the combat shotgun sound like a regular pistol? Seriously, my sisters farts sound more hardcore than it. And that?s bad. Otherwise, Monster sounds are good, if there are any. I usually have all my volume down except for the music.

Once again, Bethesda uses the old dartboard technique. Come on guys, when I hear a voice, I don?t want some deep voice playing a scientist as my father. Sure, the annoying Doctor Li was fitted perfectly, amazing even me. Maybe it was one of your magical fairy princesses casting a magical spell. And also, what kind of drugs did you guys give ?Three Dog?? He?s so energetic im wondering if you paid him more than everybody else. Maybe that?s why they all suck. Seriously, hes like a hyperactive baby who just came out of the womb. ?This is Three dog, Waaaaah!, and I need my diaper changed mommy!? and why isn?t there a preset of voices for your character? Saints row 2 did it. Sure they didn?t have an asian voice but I don?t care. I think my hardcore asian gangster with a bloody british voice was cool. MAJOR Suggestion: Main character needs voice.

End Score: 10/100

Map:
All games have maps, and some of them, if you look closely enough represent actual geographic features and cities. The Fallout series alwas did a good bjob at this but never hid behind some fancy names like ?hoobaloo town? or ?bimbo city.? They just named its new names, like, for example, New Reno, New Vegas, and the Capital Wasteland. In the previous games, it wasn?t detailed as the game engine wasn?t that great. But with Bethesda using their same engine as Oblivion, you really get to see the details. The Washington monument can be seen almost everywhere, and if you haven?t seent he concept art yet, I suggest you do. The concept is that of the original Halo concept art, making me melt.

End Score:100/100

Overall review: Fallout 3 is a great game and, although it does nto do the est job, it does an overall medium-rare job for the rare steak I ordered. I still like it, but it was too hyped. I am glad that the original fallout team is working on New vegas. Please, please, please use good voice actors that fit their roles. The one thing that the PC version has going for it that there are mods (modifications) and the game is less expensive.
Overall score: 58/100
 

Valkyira

New member
Mar 13, 2009
1,733
0
0
I disagree, I think it's one of the best games of this generation. The exploration is amazing, and even though it's years old, the game still looks and plays great.
 

Zackary Yakumo

New member
Mar 29, 2010
306
0
0
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
I disagree, I think it's one of the best games of this generation. The exploration is amazing, and even though it's years old, the game still looks and plays great.
dont get me wrong, i love the game with my heart. but..... its not the same. i mean, it has the fallout feel, but... its lacking somewhere. Example, in the original fallout and fallout 2 in VATS, you could aim for the eyes AND the head. in this one you cant. I just think Bethesda jumped on the ball, stumbled a bit, but is getting used to it running on the ball.
 

Ender0Speaker

New member
Apr 26, 2009
6
0
0
"As all rpgs, you must level up, usually by doing quests to get experience. But no, you can get experience by killing civilians."

Did you actually do any of the side quests, or even the main quests? You get experience for them. Sure, you can get experience for killing people/creatures, but quests usually give out a lot more. The way it's phrased here makes it sound like you didn't actually play it for more than three or four missions and never took a look at the little exp. bar filling up whenever one was completed.

Over all I've got to say I seriously disagree. I just finished Fallout 3 for the first time last weekend, and I'm still playing it every now and then. Possibly one of my favorite games. It combined light shooter elements with some great RPG mechanics and that really made me feel at home, as I prefer RPG games to shooters.
 

klakkat

New member
May 24, 2008
825
0
0
while I consider Karma a fucking joke and the central narrative was mediocre at best, the exploration element was well above anything I've ever seen (and, ever since the early Fallout games, that's the main thing I wanted). The combat is competent at the least, and in comparison I can't call it "uninspired" because it is better than most I've seen for FPS and FPS/RPG games generated after Deus Ex. The leveling works fine; it isn't too hard to level, but levels alone don't break the game either (the equipment does that). Overall, I would say Fallout 3 is a superior game in today's market, and honestly I'm a pretty fucking harsh critic for most things.
 

Zackary Yakumo

New member
Mar 29, 2010
306
0
0
Ender0Speaker said:
"As all rpgs, you must level up, usually by doing quests to get experience. But no, you can get experience by killing civilians."

Did you actually do any of the side quests, or even the main quests? You get experience for them. Sure, you can get experience for killing people/creatures, but quests usually give out a lot more. The way it's phrased here makes it sound like you didn't actually play it for more than three or four missions and never took a look at the little exp. bar filling up whenever one was completed.

Over all I've got to say I seriously disagree. I just finished Fallout 3 for the first time last weekend, and I'm still playing it every now and then. Possibly one of my favorite games. It combined light shooter elements with some great RPG mechanics and that really made me feel at home, as I prefer RPG games to shooters.
i actually did all of the side quests, ppayed and played all of the expansions and yes i know you get experience. i got to level 20 before getting to GNR. but what im saying is that in most games if you kill civilians then everyone automatically hates your guts and wants to rip them out. and salso that you usually dont get any XP.
 

Ender0Speaker

New member
Apr 26, 2009
6
0
0
Ah, I apologize. I read it wrong I suppose. Now that I go back and read it it makes sense. Maybe I should go to bed. I've only been up all night. . .
 

minimacker

New member
Apr 20, 2010
637
0
0
I also disagree, the voices in Fallout 3 are great! Compare it to other RPGs.
It's especially amazing how they put the extra effort into conversations. It's the fine detail that's awesome.
Even if there aren't THAT many unique types of voices, those few actors must've worked overtime because there are so many responses in conversation. Play through the game picking different chat options and you'll get a different response, fully voice acted. A single NPC could have a buttload of responses, all with their unique conversation. ONE example would be Moria Brown who has a gigantic quest. There are probably hundreds of voice clips they had to record.

Yeah, I know, everyone gets an opinion. But I'd say that giving Voice acting a 10/100 is far too low.


Edit: And so are the exploration elements. Pure divine. The other pointers I agree on though, but only a lil' :3
 

chozo_hybrid

What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets.
Jul 15, 2009
3,479
14
43
10/100 for the voice acting ^^; You didn't like the fact that a scientist had a deep voice, I think Liam Neeson was awesome, he also knows a thing or two about acting.

This isn't so much a review as it is personal opinion, for example, can you name any game that has more then the good, neutral or the bad dialogue choices? At least you get choices with this game. You're griping about something to be better when there is no better so far. I know the game never pushed the envelope on most of its stuff, but it was certainly better in the aspects you say it's not up to par with.

Also, nothing should be able to get 100/100 because that means they could never improve, this might be just me, but I can't take a review seriously when it has perfect scores in more then one area and below average in others.

Shi Shi said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
I disagree, I think it's one of the best games of this generation. The exploration is amazing, and even though it's years old, the game still looks and plays great.
dont get me wrong, i love the game with my heart. but..... its not the same. i mean, it has the fallout feel, but... its lacking somewhere. Example, in the original fallout and fallout 2 in VATS, you could aim for the eyes AND the head. in this one you cant. I just think Bethesda jumped on the ball, stumbled a bit, but is getting used to it running on the ball.
As for VATS, if you made it any more "precise" it'd become a bit broken I think. What you have to remember is that it is a different combat style as well.

Also, and I know this is a petty gripe. But if you're going to write a review, you could work on your sentence structure and grammar a bit. Just a little advice.
 

The Rockerfly

New member
Dec 31, 2008
4,649
0
0
10 for the voice acting? I honestly feel like you didn't play the game for more then a few hours I mean the shotgun and the pistol sounding the same?
Make a judgement for yourselves if these all sound the same

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCwWUUoJfQ4

Correct answer is you can easily tell they have different sound effects, some have a more rusty sound, others have more bass and this is without even considering some of the bigger weapons

You do have to be joking and an overall 58/100 though? You don't even look at the actual gameplay or controls. These are the main parts of a game and it's functionality, while a story, graphics and sound maybe nice what's the point in playing a game if the gameplay is boring? Right? Then why didn't you consider it?

I know this is your personal opinion and all that bullshit but don't call this a review because to review a game you have to treat every single game in a similar way and judge it in the same ways as you do other games and if you do review games without considering gameplay I honestly think it's a joke

Shi Shi said:
i actually did all of the side quests, ppayed and played all of the expansions and yes i know you get experience. i got to level 20 before getting to GNR. but what im saying is that in most games if you kill civilians then everyone automatically hates your guts and wants to rip them out. and salso that you usually dont get any XP.
Everyone shoots at you and you get bad karma so shops won't serve you and people won't give you any information. If anything it's a hell of a lot more realistic then 90% of RPGs that ave this function. For example, I kill someone, accidentally save then I could never go back to that place. What if there is information or a weapon I need from that place? I can't get it. It's a stupid old fashion mechanic that is a God send that they got rid of, from a realistic, fun and good game design point of view
 

Zackary Yakumo

New member
Mar 29, 2010
306
0
0
sorry peop that it is quite literally five in the morning over here and I just finished typing this, so i didnt have much time to preview the document. for the overall score, yes i would have given it more, but i took the score from each category and divided it by five (number of categories). for the sound, I rarely use the shotguns anymore, and okay, pistol isnt a good comparison. it just didnt, oh i dont know, sound like a shotgun. I ussually have the volume down all the ay anyways since i live right above the apartment manager and he complains about me entering my room, so sorry. like i was telling a friend, I love this game, but i think they have could have imporoved it a lot. hopefully the next one is better in my eyes.
 

chozo_hybrid

What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets.
Jul 15, 2009
3,479
14
43
Shi Shi said:
sorry peop that it is quite literally five in the morning over here and I just finished typing this, so i didnt have much time to preview the document. for the overall score, yes i would have given it more, but i took the score from each category and divided it by five (number of categories). for the sound, I rarely use the shotguns anymore, and okay, pistol isnt a good comparison. it just didnt, oh i dont know, sound like a shotgun. I ussually have the volume down all the ay anyways since i live right above the apartment manager and he complains about me entering my room, so sorry. like i was telling a friend, I love this game, but i think they have could have imporoved it a lot. hopefully the next one is better in my eyes.
Maybe next time, save the review, look over it before letting the public see it? You might notice or change things to make it better.

But honestly, as someone pointed out, you didn't even look at the game play itself. That's a big no no when reviewing a video game.

Out of curiosity, have you ever heard a shotgun in real life? Because I have, and I think it sounds fairly accurate for a probably overused and post-apocalyptic manufactured weapon.
 

The Rockerfly

New member
Dec 31, 2008
4,649
0
0
Shi Shi said:
sorry peop that it is quite literally five in the morning over here and I just finished typing this, so i didnt have much time to preview the document. for the overall score, yes i would have given it more, but i took the score from each category and divided it by five (number of categories). for the sound, I rarely use the shotguns anymore, and okay, pistol isnt a good comparison. it just didnt, oh i dont know, sound like a shotgun. I ussually have the volume down all the ay anyways since i live right above the apartment manager and he complains about me entering my room, so sorry. like i was telling a friend, I love this game, but i think they have could have imporoved it a lot. hopefully the next one is better in my eyes.
That's no excuse though. If you think the guns sound the same, make a good comparison in the review. How about next time you write a review, save it till the morning, make sure that you have used good points, spell check it, make sure grammar and structure is okay.

Also buy some headphones, that'll stop him being so pissy and you can play louder. Also the overall score does not have to be from the other scores. A lot of reviewers give it a final score not based off the things they have reviewed. This is because some parts (for example) story might be irrelevant in the game however it is a great game
 

reg42

New member
Mar 18, 2009
5,390
0
0
Wow dude. This was just... Grammar. Just, next time, grammar.
Way too short.
I don't think you could have gone into any less detail with the story if you had tried.
You didn't even mention the gameplay
You didn't mention graphics at all.
You didn't mention it being immersive.
And this part just confused me
Fallout 3 is a great game and, although it does nto do the est job
Overall score: 58/100
Generally 58/100 isn't a score that one would give "a great game"
 

reg42

New member
Mar 18, 2009
5,390
0
0
Shi Shi said:
Ender0Speaker said:
"As all rpgs, you must level up, usually by doing quests to get experience. But no, you can get experience by killing civilians."

Did you actually do any of the side quests, or even the main quests? You get experience for them. Sure, you can get experience for killing people/creatures, but quests usually give out a lot more. The way it's phrased here makes it sound like you didn't actually play it for more than three or four missions and never took a look at the little exp. bar filling up whenever one was completed.

Over all I've got to say I seriously disagree. I just finished Fallout 3 for the first time last weekend, and I'm still playing it every now and then. Possibly one of my favorite games. It combined light shooter elements with some great RPG mechanics and that really made me feel at home, as I prefer RPG games to shooters.
i actually did all of the side quests, ppayed and played all of the expansions and yes i know you get experience. i got to level 20 before getting to GNR. but what im saying is that in most games if you kill civilians then everyone automatically hates your guts and wants to rip them out. and salso that you usually dont get any XP.
You barely get any XP for killing civs. You get like 1 XP per kill. That's like fucking nothing.
 

spinFX

New member
Aug 18, 2008
490
0
0
This is an awful review. No objectivity. Overly simplified. Sounds like you played the game for 10 minutes and then just decided to jump on the "it's not the same as Fallout 1 or 2". You're scoring system is terrible if you "loved the game with your heart" and then give it a 58/100 not to mention nit picking details that arguably aren't there.

All in all I love your review with my heart but I give it a 13/100.
 

Zackary Yakumo

New member
Mar 29, 2010
306
0
0
all i can say is thank you for pointing out my faults. and im not being sarcastic. I actually love the things everyone is pointing out.Its making me realize hwo much i missed so i can go back and redo this. thats and it gives me an excuse to spend my whole day tomorrow playing it.
 

Ghostkai

New member
Jun 14, 2008
1,170
0
0
Over simplified and a bit too opinionated to be frank. And the "scoring system" is a bit of a joke.

Although, you may have played it till level 20, the review gives the distinct feeling that you played for an hour or two.
 

Stranger of Sorts

Individual #472
Aug 23, 2009
1,227
0
0
Hello Mr. Not-nearly-as-good-as-SavingPrincess-at-rants

In a "review" such as this there is no need for scores, your opinion seems to fall at either great, terrible or okay. There's no reason to score it out of 100 of all things; especially when you do it for every section. Why should I care about your writing when there are numbers summing it all up? Furthermore, do not average the scores out for the final score if you insist on using them. This means you are completely negating the things you didn't bother to mention. And trust me, there are a lot of things you missed out.

I won't go into the writing now since there are more pressing things but seriously, take a tour around the review section. And since you are going down the SavingPrincess route, take a look at his.

All in the name of constructive criticism of course, I look forward to seeingyour next review if you decide to try a new one.