Because a game doesn't need a number in it to be a sequel?redbeta22 said:Then why isn't it called Fallout 4?Mr.PlanetEater said:Yes because a new story, new characters, new weapons, new developers, a new map thatredbeta22 said:Fallout New Vaegas: The Expansion pack that walks like a sequel. Fuck new Vegas.
is then Fallout 3' with no relation to Fallout 3 what so ever is definitely an expansion.
Making the assumption that a game must be bad because it is old? Clearly you are a genius whose logic is unquestionable.luckycharms8282 said:Now, you make the claim that a game made in 1998 is BETTER than Fallout 3. I find it surprising you can even compare two games that were made a decade apart from each other. Probably the only reason you say F2 is better is because you played it as a child. You now feel nostalgic whenever you think about it, and as time goes on you idealize the game and make it seem better than the pixelated nightmare that it really is.
Have I done a sufficient job reminding you, or do you want me to dedicate my afternoon to pleasing you?
why isn't GTA IV called GTA VI?redbeta22 said:Then why isn't it called Fallout 4?Mr.PlanetEater said:Yes because a new story, new characters, new weapons, new developers, a new map thatredbeta22 said:Fallout New Vaegas: The Expansion pack that walks like a sequel. Fuck new Vegas.
is then Fallout 3' with no relation to Fallout 3 what so ever is definitely an expansion.
Okay, I'm sick of fanboys crying about how "Bethesda fucked up Fallout". Let's see, combat, F1-2 had turn based combat and had "dice rolls" for hit or miss, sure you could try VATS but it was still the same dice rolling crap, the winner was usually the guy with the better gun. Fallout 3 had real time combat, could pause to let the player pick body parts to cripple enemies to great effect, being less rigid meant more strategies could be incorporated, stealth may not be great but it's there, unlike 1-2 where you generally were not given said option in combat.Flying-Emu said:Whoa.luckycharms8282 said:honestly, no I dont think it will be as good. It will possibly be awesome, but not the pure orgasm FO3 was
You'll have to remind me, when was F3 an orgasm?
The game was good, but... F2 was better :/
Agreed. It's one of those there is not a word in spoken language that can express kinda things.The Bum said:My joy at the fact that it's coming out in less than a week simply cannot be expresed in text.
Your right. Im wrong, Stupid me. Fuck new vegas, you guys have fun.mad825 said:why isn't GTA IV called GTA VI?redbeta22 said:Then why isn't it called Fallout 4?Mr.PlanetEater said:Yes because a new story, new characters, new weapons, new developers, a new map thatredbeta22 said:Fallout New Vaegas: The Expansion pack that walks like a sequel. Fuck new Vegas.
is then Fallout 3' with no relation to Fallout 3 what so ever is definitely an expansion.
why isn't GTA:Vice city called GTA IV?
why isn't Resident evil 5 called Resident evil 7?(12? 13? I don't know, I've lost count)
and so on...
to apply some Yatzee terminology, Bethesda adopts Capcom's "because I say so" aka "resident Evil method"
This just confuses me. Fallout 1/2's combat did revolve largely around stats, yes, but that doesn't mean tactics instantly flew out the window. The unforgiving difficulty meant that you had to think about your plan of attack, lest you be cut in half by Super Mutants.Blatherscythe said:Okay, I'm sick of fanboys crying about how "Bethesda fucked up Fallout". Let's see, combat, F1-2 had turn based combat and had "dice rolls" for hit or miss, sure you could try VATS but it was still the same dice rolling crap, the winner was usually the guy with the better gun. Fallout 3 had real time combat, could pause to let the player pick body parts to cripple enemies to great effect, being less rigid meant more strategies could be incorporated, stealth may not be great but it's there, unlike 1-2 where you generally were not given said option in combat.Flying-Emu said:Whoa.luckycharms8282 said:honestly, no I dont think it will be as good. It will possibly be awesome, but not the pure orgasm FO3 was
You'll have to remind me, when was F3 an orgasm?
The game was good, but... F2 was better :/
Hmmm, let me think about this for a moment, I'm really having trouble deciding. Of course Fallout 3 looks better, it came out 10 years after the previous games. So what? It shouldn't be that hard to look past some out-dated graphics, and if it is then you really need to get your priorities straight.Graphics, 3d vs 2d who wins?
Yes, I suppose it would be if you're a moron who can't pay attention to anything for more than 5 seconds if someone's head isn't exploding. One of the things people liked so much about the older games is that you could approach just about any given situation from multiple angles, instead of just resorting to murder every time.Gameplay, F3 is much more action packed and can keep your attention longer than F1 or 2
I take it you didn't notice that that the above person stated they played Fallout 2 after Fallout 3, and the same goes for me. People should really stop living under the assumption that just because something is old it's automatically bad.Take off your damn nostalgia glasses, the only reason people who loved F1-2 like F:NV better than F3 is because some Obsidian employees are from Black Isle. God damn does it feel good to get that off my chest.