Oh I like, how about;Moosejaw said:Fallout: Shadows of Boston sounds about as foreboding as Fallout: Depths of Wisconsin.
Yeah... didn't want to comment in this thread, but I had to congratulate you for that one. Win.martyrdrebel27 said:Fallout: The Boston T-34b Party would be better than that.
What about Fourllout? They could even work the title in to an in-game pun by having four louts show up repeatedly for comedic effect, slipping on radscorpion droppings and the such.Kyogissun said:Other names that are just as bad as shadows of boston:
Fallout: Brotherhood
Fallout: Apocalyptic War
Fallout: Brand New World
Fallout: Return of the Enclave
Fallout: New E.D.E.N.
Fallout: The South Rises
Fallout: Fallout
F.A.L.L.O.U.T.
F4LLOUT
FALL0UT
There you go Bethesda.
Especially if such TES games already exists (Daggerfall and Redguard are two off my head)Ultratwinkie said:I would wait for a Bethesda game that isn't bound by prophecy, but I'd be waiting for a long time.
Well, by same logic we can't really claim that any game they release isn't ran by prophecy, because 10 games later they might claim otherwiseUltratwinkie said:That was old bethesda.
And those games are actually still part of the dragon prophecy, at least when it concerns TES lore fanatics. They all complete one of the signs needed for Skyrim to happen. All those games led up to Skyrim, which is the last part of the prophecy.
So TES games are a prophecy within prophecy most of the time. Even when they are not explicitly stated.
Only if we can also agree that "The REALLY Wild Wasteland" is a good one.Josh Engen said:Plus, can we all agree that Shadows of Boston would be the lamest title in history?