My brother went and watched this thing. From what he's told me, the takeaway is that trying to create a more faithful adaptation of a book does not necessarily create a good film. Who knew?
For instance, there are continuity problems with a few scenes. It omits the prologue and starts with Gandalf greeting Bilbo at Bag End, but still has the '60 years later' caption, which now makes no sense. In omitting everything to do with Tauriel for example, it doesn't explain how Kili got cured of his stab wound, and Kili's death itself was cut because she was obviously a big part of it. I think it also cut Fili's death as well because of reasons. The thing is, you can't get away with killing off two major characters in a movie like you could in a book. That needs to be shown, not told.
It also downplays Legolas, which sounds fine in theory, but it leads to an issue in the final battle where Thorin is suddenly using Orcrist for no apparent reason. It also doesn't show what Gandalf was up to when he left the party, which again is something that you really ought to show in a movie.
Apparently, it did remove a lot of the filler involving the Wormtongue-like comic relief dude in Battle of Five Armies, which is something I can 100% get behind. I liked the Hobbit movies in general, and the first two were comparatively restrained, but I think the third one stretched the friendship a bit too far.
For instance, there are continuity problems with a few scenes. It omits the prologue and starts with Gandalf greeting Bilbo at Bag End, but still has the '60 years later' caption, which now makes no sense. In omitting everything to do with Tauriel for example, it doesn't explain how Kili got cured of his stab wound, and Kili's death itself was cut because she was obviously a big part of it. I think it also cut Fili's death as well because of reasons. The thing is, you can't get away with killing off two major characters in a movie like you could in a book. That needs to be shown, not told.
It also downplays Legolas, which sounds fine in theory, but it leads to an issue in the final battle where Thorin is suddenly using Orcrist for no apparent reason. It also doesn't show what Gandalf was up to when he left the party, which again is something that you really ought to show in a movie.
Apparently, it did remove a lot of the filler involving the Wormtongue-like comic relief dude in Battle of Five Armies, which is something I can 100% get behind. I liked the Hobbit movies in general, and the first two were comparatively restrained, but I think the third one stretched the friendship a bit too far.