Deadpool is a mutant so that makes him automatically under Fox's belt.Saltyk said:Actually how does Fox have the rights to Deadpool? I thought they only had Fantastic Four and X-Men. Is it just because Deadpool is semi related to Wolverine?
Deadpool is a mutant so that makes him automatically under Fox's belt.Saltyk said:Actually how does Fox have the rights to Deadpool? I thought they only had Fantastic Four and X-Men. Is it just because Deadpool is semi related to Wolverine?
My post previous postSaltyk said:Quality > Quantity
I'd rather have one Guardians of the Galaxy than two Fant4stick
Also, aren't all of those movies you mentioned being made by Marvel as part of Phase 3?
Deadpool is not, nor ever has been a mutant.LordLundar said:Deadpool is a mutant so that makes him automatically under Fox's belt.Saltyk said:Actually how does Fox have the rights to Deadpool? I thought they only had Fantastic Four and X-Men. Is it just because Deadpool is semi related to Wolverine?
Yeah, Deadpool is what is called a Mutate. Someone who was born without the X-Gene, but was able to acquire mutant abilities through scientific methods.Burned Hand said:That's riiiight, I forgot about that. He was born human, and they gave him a healing factor in Weapon-X to save him from cancer.P-89 Scorpion said:Deadpool is not, nor ever has been a mutant.LordLundar said:Deadpool is a mutant so that makes him automatically under Fox's belt.Saltyk said:Actually how does Fox have the rights to Deadpool? I thought they only had Fantastic Four and X-Men. Is it just because Deadpool is semi related to Wolverine?
Fox has Deadpool because they have the rights to nearly all characters who first appeared in a comic related to the X-men.
To the point that he can make a tragic and to some points even sympathetic... erm, 'hero'. When the writers don't just use him as a gag or a medium for pop culture references. Which is unfortunately most of the time.Burned Hand said:-snip-
Seriously ? Is that an actual line ?Happiness Assassin said:("The biochemistry is off the charts!")
Exactly this. Why make it so badly, when there's this big pile of money waiting for a good production? Only reason for such a terrible movie is FOX wanting to hurt the franchise, and hurt Marvel. There's no way they'd be that petty though.Xsjadoblayde said:I did not know that was the reason they keep releasing these. Wow. I mean at least give some budding script writers and directors a chance at it, not poop it out like a chore!
Anyone remember that Mad Max film that happened in this year? Yeah, just reminding you that films are still, and can be goodish in fact, someone reminded me earlier today of that particular example. However, they allegedly haven't seen Independence Day, so I had no choice but to remove them from their Earthly chains, as only quantum lizard sloths from venus have not seen that film!
Well, F4 comics arent exaclty hot sellers theese days, and as mentioned before Marvel still has the merch rights so theres none of that going around either.Wiggum Esquilax said:Exactly this. Why make it so badly, when there's this big pile of money waiting for a good production? Only reason for such a terrible movie is FOX wanting to hurt the franchise, and hurt Marvel. There's no way they'd be that petty though.Xsjadoblayde said:I did not know that was the reason they keep releasing these. Wow. I mean at least give some budding script writers and directors a chance at it, not poop it out like a chore!
Anyone remember that Mad Max film that happened in this year? Yeah, just reminding you that films are still, and can be goodish in fact, someone reminded me earlier today of that particular example. However, they allegedly haven't seen Independence Day, so I had no choice but to remove them from their Earthly chains, as only quantum lizard sloths from venus have not seen that film!
...They wouldn't, would they?
Don't doubt just how petty corporate culture can get. There's a rumor that Hideo Kojima and his entire branch at Konami were torn apart because Kojima made a crack about the size of one of the higher ups junk.Wiggum Esquilax said:Exactly this. Why make it so badly, when there's this big pile of money waiting for a good production? Only reason for such a terrible movie is FOX wanting to hurt the franchise, and hurt Marvel. There's no way they'd be that petty though.Xsjadoblayde said:I did not know that was the reason they keep releasing these. Wow. I mean at least give some budding script writers and directors a chance at it, not poop it out like a chore!
Anyone remember that Mad Max film that happened in this year? Yeah, just reminding you that films are still, and can be goodish in fact, someone reminded me earlier today of that particular example. However, they allegedly haven't seen Independence Day, so I had no choice but to remove them from their Earthly chains, as only quantum lizard sloths from venus have not seen that film!
...They wouldn't, would they?
100% true. That is right up there with "The neutrinos have mutated."PBMcNair said:Seriously ? Is that an actual line ?Happiness Assassin said:("The biochemistry is off the charts!")
Remember, Fantastic Four has the glory and honour of naming the trope [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ReedRichardsIsUseless] for describing characters with incredible powers and technology and not doing anything with them until something equally incredible or more so shows up.hittite said:What is it with the Fantastic Four that makes them just sit around and do nothing with their powers in their movies? Is it really that hard to make them go rescue people from a fire or stop a bank robbery or something?
Christ, I knew it would be trash, but I had no idea it would be that bad.Happiness Assassin said:100% true. That is right up there with "The neutrinos have mutated."PBMcNair said:Seriously ? Is that an actual line ?Happiness Assassin said:("The biochemistry is off the charts!")
I'd say that it has less to do with being 'progressive' or whatever (regardless of the somewhat lamentable lack of good non-white-male-led superhero films out at the moment) and more due to nepotism on the part of Josh Trank because Michael B. Jordan was also in Chronicle. After all, Johhny Storm was at the forefront of most of the posters and trailers; it's not as if they made it a secret that Johnny's Trank's favourite.Jake Martinez said:The movie that everyone thought was going to be terrible turned out to actually be terrible.
So, now that it's agreed that this movie universally sucks, are we allowed to agree that having Michael B. Jordan play Johnny Storm was just cynical pandering to the identity obsessed press or do we still have to pretend that this is some sort of great triumph for social equality. Because man, if it's the later then I would demand another attempt or something.