Because it's in direct contravention of Facebook's policies. I thought that was fairly clear, sorry for the confusion.ark123 said:why this would be called "a leak" and reported as such is also amazing in my opinion.
I guess I just think you guys should be more on the side of "this is not a big deal, since we routinely give away such numbers" instead of the side of "this is hacking-style data mining". I mean, read these comments with all the clueless people yelling about privacy and how evil Zinga is.Andy Chalk said:Because it's in direct contravention of Facebook's policies. I thought that was fairly clear, sorry for the confusion.ark123 said:why this would be called "a leak" and reported as such is also amazing in my opinion.
Leave it untouched for a month or so and it'll be deleted, like any account in any facebook app.Fr said:anc[is]LOL poo fart ass XD
You can't delete your farmville can you? I tried it and quit months ago, and yet I'm still probably screwed. Well not really, none of that info is real. Still.
Yeah... Facebook and Zynga are hilarious. I'm still not sure how there haven't been more lawsuits against them (that have won).danpascooch said:Alright, this is total bullshit.
I can't believe they have the nerve to call this a "leak"
Something like a photo of a game studio that accidentally caught something secret in the background is a leak.
SELLING INFORMATION TO ADVERTISERS IS NOT A leak.
I mean COME ON!
Whoops, we accidentally sold thousands of people's information, oopsie!
Nnno. The only thing "stolen" here is the link to their profiles.Scrumpmonkey said:So social games are practically spyware eh?
For...what exactly? Let's just, for the moment, assume that this "leak" was intentional - the worst of all possible cases. What crime has been committed? The information being lost was publicly available anyhow. It offered no access to anything other than knowledge of your basic existence. In that way, it offers no better means of identification than, say, your e-mail address does. Even though I don't like what has been done, I cannot think of a crime even tangentially related to such an act. Invasion of privacy? You submitted that information to the internet. Encrypted page or not, it is a public network where every bit of traffic can be intercepted and decoded given sufficient resources (and a willingness to do so) by anyone else on the network. The right to privacy on the internet is hardly a right but rather an inconvenient hurdle that is sufficient to stop the most passive of attempts to invade.aaronmcc said:PLEASE PLEASE PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE fuck Zynga with a MASSIVE fine!
So you think they are dicks. I think they are dicks. Hence I wish them to be screwed over for their disgraceful practices, it's not like I researched the law regarding this area before I knocked out my post. I just don't like them.Eclectic Dreck said:For...what exactly? Let's just, for the moment, assume that this "leak" was intentional - the worst of all possible cases. What crime has been committed? The information being lost was publicly available anyhow. It offered no access to anything other than knowledge of your basic existence. In that way, it offers no better means of identification than, say, your e-mail address does. Even though I don't like what has been done, I cannot think of a crime even tangentially related to such an act. Invasion of privacy? You submitted that information to the internet. Encrypted page or not, it is a public network where every bit of traffic can be intercepted and decoded given sufficient resources (and a willingness to do so) by anyone else on the network. The right to privacy on the internet is hardly a right but rather an inconvenient hurdle that is sufficient to stop the most passive of attempts to invade.aaronmcc said:PLEASE PLEASE PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE fuck Zynga with a MASSIVE fine!
But, obviously this information has value or else it would not be collected and then widely disseminated. Is such an action slimy? Certainly. But Zynga has never been in business of catering to the players. The customers they serve are their advertisers and their user base is nothing more than an audience held captive by an ever changing assortment of gaudy baubles. Why then, when the commodity primarily being traded in this exchange is your time and attention, do we think it might be criminal when we add to that list the simple acknowledgment that you exist as an online persona?\
That then begs a further question. If there is no violation of criminal law, that still means one party could try and sue the other for breach of contract. The trouble is, Facebook needs Zynga and, until something rises to the sheer level of popularity as Facebook, Zynga needs facebook as well. They can't very well go around suing one another as the well being of one entity is so closely linked to another.