Fatherland

Recommended Videos

shirin238

New member
Aug 19, 2008
257
0
0
This is EA... They had creepy babies in Dante's Inferno as well as in Dead Space 2
 

Teoes

Poof, poof, sparkles!
Jun 1, 2010
5,173
0
0
Body armour made of babies. I think you guys are on to something.
 

WanderingFool

New member
Apr 9, 2009
3,989
0
0
Slightly off topic, but what if a future COd game was basically the plot of The Last of Us for its campaign?
 

-Dragmire-

King over my mind
Mar 29, 2011
2,821
0
0
At least they weren't Drakengard demon space babies.


That almost sounds like a joke...
 

SKBPinkie

New member
Oct 6, 2013
552
0
0
Ugh...

This is precisely what puts me off the Battlefield series. And it's not just the producers / designers, it's also the fans. If you're trying to sell me a product, stop constantly comparing yourself to everything else and just tell me what's good about it. I'm perfectly capable of making the comparisons myself; don't treat me like a fucking idiot.

Reminds me of the whole "I'm a Mac" campaign. It just comes off as insecure and douchey to me.
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
Teoes said:
Body armour made of babies. I think you guys are on to something.
Especially if said baby-body-armor comes equipped with akimbo desert eagles!
 

Daaaah Whoosh

New member
Jun 23, 2010
1,041
0
0
I do like the spirit of competition between Battlefield and CoD, except I feel like CoD isn't really participating. I mean, half of the campaign of BC2 was aimed at making fun of MW2, but so far all I've seen of Battlefield in the Call of Duty games is the map destruction they added to Ghosts.
 

Jandau

Smug Platypus
Dec 19, 2008
5,030
0
0
RJ 17 said:
Teoes said:
Body armour made of babies. I think you guys are on to something.
Especially if said baby-body-armor comes equipped with akimbo desert eagles!
It's like having your own personal torso-mounted autonomous turret. They should allow you to level up the baby separately in multiplayer, with its own Perks and all...
 

Redlin5_v1legacy

Better Red than Dead
Aug 5, 2009
48,834
0
0
It's not that bad... They could have baby sized bomb vests on.

Oh wait, that's later in the game isn't it? THE HORROR
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
Jandau said:
RJ 17 said:
Teoes said:
Body armour made of babies. I think you guys are on to something.
Especially if said baby-body-armor comes equipped with akimbo desert eagles!
It's like having your own personal torso-mounted autonomous turret. They should allow you to level up the baby separately in multiplayer, with its own Perks and all...
Next thing you know, daddy's little chest-piece is going to be quick-scoping with the best of'em. *sniffle* They grow up so fast!
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
So what you're telling me is that Battlefield has suddenly become Dwarf Fortress?

I'd play it.
 

SweetShark

Shark Girls are my Waifus
Jan 9, 2012
5,147
0
0
This actually sound like a good idea for a small part of the game.
A man [or a woman] holding a small bady trying to get out as stealthy as possible.
Now, I know, if a genious find a good reason for this kind of gameplay, please tell so...
 

Rufus Shinra

New member
Oct 11, 2011
103
0
0
Twenty Ninjas said:
This looks like the beginning of an SMBC strip.

2015: Activision yet again raises the stakes by making babies the main playable characters.
2015: EA responds by making babies the main villains
2016: Activision makes its baby characters die tragic deaths
2016: EA nukes an entire town full of evil babies
2017: Activision invites babies into the dev team
2017: EA sacrifices babies during Battlefield development.

2046: The war against babies has gone on for two decades. The babies are winning. Soon nothing will remain in the world but super-smart babies.

2153: Major baby corporation invents popular first-person shooter
2153: Competition to major baby corporation invents similar popular first-person shooter
2154: Major baby corporation adds dog to popular first-person shooter.

4652: the human-baby war is so catastrophic that civilization gets tossed back into the Dark Ages. Only subhumans survive.

We are now in the 47th cycle.
Still better than ME3's ending. :p
 

themilo504

New member
May 9, 2010
731
0
0
Did ea really have a npc kill a dog at the start of battlefield 4? if so that?s such a childish thing to do, if you?re going to make fun of your rival at least be clever about it.
 

lSHaDoW-FoXl

New member
Jul 17, 2008
616
0
0
Whelp, I'm definitely not playing Battlefield 4. Well, I mean, not unless the NPC gets his nuts bitten off later on in the game and dies screaming at the top of his lungs like a 12 year old girl. But, yeah. This is modern shooters in a nutshell. Pretending to be gritty and edgy by killing things that appeal to our emotion (Children, dogs, innocent people) and then not really actually having anything 'edgy' or 'gritty' to say about war. (Let me guess, the plot involves you saving the world from another world war, right? Yeah, thought so.) So while they may pretend to have depth by shocking us by showing us some things we may dislike about war (Nuclear bombs, children, dogs) they pretty much undermine anything they have to show us by then turning around and then giving us an easy answer. (Like say, all those people, children, and animals you murdered in cold blood being for the greater good because hey, you saved the world!)

So, to an extent, it almost defends these acts.

So I guess I'll share a real gritty fact: Dogs that are in the military (Fighting in a war for a far more brutal, savage, and selfish species that they shouldn't be fighting for) are usually hard to find homes for once their 'service' ends.

Humans fight wars, and only humans should die in them. Preferably only those that choose to volunteer.