Favorite book series that ended badly.

The_Blue_Rider

New member
Sep 4, 2009
2,190
0
0
brunothepig said:
The Inheritance Cycle. Pains me to say it, because I loved those books, but I'm really bitter about the end.
So, Eragon leaves. I know, not really a spoiler cause Angela predicted it in the first book blah blah. But the prophecy also says he'll never return. First off it's been said the future can be changed. More importantly, there is not a single good reason Eragon wouldn't return. For those of you that haven't read the books, Eragon leaves to establish a new Dragon Rider order. Which means wherever he ends up, it must be close enough to Alagaesia that new Dragon Riders can travel there after they are picked. Otherwise either Eragon will be sitting there alone while all the Dragon Riders stay in Alagaesia, or there will be no new Dragon Riders. Why the hell will Eragon never again return? In ten years he isn't going to put someone else in charge and pop back to see how the land he helped free is doing? To meet his nephew?

The only reason Paolini did it is as homage to LOTR. The final scene is Eragon sailing down a river on an elven boat, saying goodbye to friends he's met in his travels, such as the dwarf king etc. The worst part is, this ending would be fine if it weren't for the prophecy. But saying he'll never return, and then everyone treating it that way, just had me sitting there the whole time waiting for someone to explain why. It just sucks that the author would twist his characters and narrative around to do that, especially when he still could have had that scene, it just wouldn't have been as similar, or sad if Eragon was planning to return.

I've already re-written it in my mind that the prophecy was speaking of his eventual death. He will leave, never to return. He may return a few times, but some day he'll go back to the Riders new place, and die there.
I'm sure there are others, but that is all I can think of right now.

I actually think the ending was quite fitting, The Dragon Riders headed somewhere where they could be completely impartial to the lands events. And I'm pretty sure that Eragon will return from time to time, just that he plans to spend most of his time at the new Dragon Riders headquarters (Whatever you want to call it), Eragons essentially become the most powerful person on the face of the planet, and he cant take too much of an active role in the fate of Alagaesia lest he become another Galbatorix.
I thought the ending was fitting, especially how the romance with him and Arya turned out, he chose not to make it completely cliche by making it not work out, and i respect him for that.

.. Still think that he should have made Roran king though, he would've been the most badass king ever (Although Nasuada makes more sense)
 

Bobbity

New member
Mar 17, 2010
1,659
0
0
Can't think of any off the top of my head that haven't already been mentioned, but I'm really worried about WoT. There are so many plot threads to be resolved before the Dark One is defeated, let alone what has to happen after. I'm hoping for a David Eddings style massive epilogue, but I'm worried that it'll just be a chapter or two crammed into the back of the book.
 

Ovedius

New member
May 17, 2011
5
0
0
nixonsnow said:
I really feel like he delayed the last book while he pushed to get the series more mainstream. HBO, video games...just seemed like he was holding the book back just to release it when he finally got his show finished. Which sucks for us, but he needs his millions, right?
You got a point there.

I don't think tv-audiences will take kindly to having to wait for several years for the next season of Game of Thrones.
-short attention spans and all that.
So perhaps the pressure of keeping up with the show will make him work a little faster.


nixonsnow said:
As for the dude that said Harry Potter is sad, you definitely haven't read these books. In these books, *SPOILER* characters you actually give a shit about die. Like main characters.
All to true.
Christ, he doesn't just kill them, he makes them suffer. Deeply.
And I never learn, just as I start to think "Hm, I really like this character." the dragon excrements start hitting the fans at near light speed.
 

Tallim

New member
Mar 16, 2010
2,054
0
0
Hero in a half shell said:
The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy trilogy of Five.

The first four books are the greatest pieces of comedic literature I have ever had the pleasure to read. The last book (Mostly Harmless) can go burn itself. So dissappointing even the author hated it.

I'm content with only recognising the Trilogy of four. It was a great ending: bittersweet on the mountainside, with Arthur, Fenchurch and *sniffle* Marvin.
There are 6. The final one And Another Thing was written by Eoin Colfer and he does an amazing job of mimicking DA's style and humour and it's a much better end to the whole thing than Mostly Harmless was.
 

Darkeagle6

New member
Nov 12, 2008
80
0
0
Everytime I see people complaining about how Harry Potter characters die in the last book, I facepalm.

The wizarding world is in a state of war. There's an actual battle in the book. People die everywhere. People you care for. From a stray bullet(spell) even. Off "screen". There's no avoiding this if you want to actually depict a war. The fact that people wrote it off as simply "shock value" and "unnecessary", the fact that so many people complained loudly that their favorite character didn't die in a blaze of glory while taking out half of the enemy army, speaks volumes about the way war is typically portrayed in mainstream media.

I personally really liked the last book in the Harry Potter series. I feel that it's in some ways more problematic than the other ones in terms of plot, and I get that some people didn't like certain things, however (although I'm a bit perplexed at how just how much ire the epilogue invokes).

I haven't read enough novels recently to share anything else about dissapointing endings, however.
 

dave1004

New member
Sep 20, 2010
199
0
0
R.A Salvatore's most recent book in the saga of a certain famous dark elf. The book's called Gauntlgrym, if you're wondering.

!!SPOILERS!!
In the book, Drizzt's friends are nigh all dead. Regis, Cattie-Brie, Wulfgar, even his foe Entreri. His only friend left is old Bruenor, but even he dies at the end. And it's just Drizzt, alone in the world, with another thousand years left to live.

*sob* I CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE...
 

Kris015

Some kind of Monster
Feb 21, 2009
1,810
0
0
Blackmagic1515 said:
I'm surprised no one's mentioned Harry Potter yet. I love the book series and then the last one happened. The epilogue SUCKED. Big time.
Why?

I never read the books, but I watched all the movies.
 

Veylon

New member
Aug 15, 2008
1,626
0
0
brunothepig said:
The Inheritance Cycle. Pains me to say it, because I loved those books, but I'm really bitter about the end.
So, Eragon leaves. I know, not really a spoiler cause Angela predicted it in the first book blah blah. But the prophecy also says he'll never return. First off it's been said the future can be changed. More importantly, there is not a single good reason Eragon wouldn't return. For those of you that haven't read the books, Eragon leaves to establish a new Dragon Rider order. Which means wherever he ends up, it must be close enough to Alagaesia that new Dragon Riders can travel there after they are picked. Otherwise either Eragon will be sitting there alone while all the Dragon Riders stay in Alagaesia, or there will be no new Dragon Riders. Why the hell will Eragon never again return? In ten years he isn't going to put someone else in charge and pop back to see how the land he helped free is doing? To meet his nephew?

The only reason Paolini did it is as homage to LOTR. The final scene is Eragon sailing down a river on an elven boat, saying goodbye to friends he's met in his travels, such as the dwarf king etc. The worst part is, this ending would be fine if it weren't for the prophecy. But saying he'll never return, and then everyone treating it that way, just had me sitting there the whole time waiting for someone to explain why. It just sucks that the author would twist his characters and narrative around to do that, especially when he still could have had that scene, it just wouldn't have been as similar, or sad if Eragon was planning to return.

I've already re-written it in my mind that the prophecy was speaking of his eventual death. He will leave, never to return. He may return a few times, but some day he'll go back to the Riders new place, and die there.
I'm sure there are others, but that is all I can think of right now.
Heh. Paolini had revealed this ending less than half way through the first book. The justifications were pretty flimsy though:
Eragon: I must leave to protect the eggs and the dragons they'll hatch into.
Arya: What about the cyborg? And all those Eldunarii? Surely the magically powerful ancient minds of the dragon race can protect their own.
Eragon: No! Only I can protect them. And I can never return!
Roran: Won't they grow up in a couple years like Saphira or Thorn? I'm pretty sure a flock of full-size dragons can take care of themselves. You could come back then.
Eragon: No! And I must travel far, far beyond the bounds of Alagaesia so that no one can ever disturb them. I will build a great hall to keep them in.
Nasuada: Why not set up shop in Vroengard? Everything's already set up there. And, in any case, wouldn't there be other people in this far away land that you don't know about?
Eragon: No!
Angela: Okay, fine. We don't want you here anyway.


My candidate for most disappointing ending to a series was the Weaver series by Stephan Baxter. There are three books about unknown people from the future reaching into the past to manipulate events. In the final book, we learn that the mysterious Weaver who everything was building up to, was in fact:
Nazis who had kidnapped an idiot savant pyschic. Heck, they weren't even clever Nazis. There was this idiot plan to divert Columbus from discovering America, which would somehow help the Nazis (if there even were Nazis, or a unified Germany, for that matter, in such an altered world) win the war. The author himself couldn't swallow that nonsense.
 

DolorousEdd

New member
Sep 25, 2010
74
0
0
Recently I find every book wearing out its welcome. And I don`t mean bad books but just generally books, even if I´m enjoying them a lot (as I usually buy books that I know are at least worth reading). I always find the last twenty percent or so the longest to read. I always think "OK, I got it, it´s great, now get to the point". Instead there are always a half-dozen buildups, some prerequisite lulls, final back-and-forth, then denouement and an epilogue. It´s as if at a certain point when the book has already established its merit, the rest gets more and more redundant. Maybe it has to do with me prematurely judging the book as "having been an interesting experience (so far)" and then kind of dismissing from my subconsciousness that there is still a solid chunk to go.
 

Greatjusticeman

New member
May 29, 2011
234
0
0
Rawne1980 said:
Daystar Clarion said:
The Dark Tower series by Stephen King.

let's just say that I fucking hate Greek Tragedies.
I'm going to have to agree with Daystar here.

I loved the Dark Tower series, it managed to keep me hooked the whole way through each book.

However....

The ending left a lot to be desired. Kind of made nearly everything that had happened thus far completely pointless.

In fact, I put the ending on par with the "it was only a dream" kind of endings.
Well, shit...

I've just started the last book right now. These negative opinions and the bunch of negative review scores on Amazon have made me kind of nervous.

Though I shouldn't be surprised by now. The writing and story began to slope on a downwards trend in Wolves of the Calla and Song of Susannah (too many pop culture references for my liking).

However, the first four books are some of my favorites of all time.
 

teebeeohh

New member
Jun 17, 2009
2,896
0
0
dune
i loved the original books but the two that were added were really bad.
i mean the think ended on a cliffhanger, some people waited over 20 years and then the big bad is
the robots that only appeared as "this is why we don't have cool scifi stuff and live in a feudal system", except for the prequel books and those weren't any good either
the writing also sucked compared to the originals.

oh and regarding the dark tower: i liked the ending but then again i am also a sucker for Sisyphus-esque gunslingers with missing finger.
edit: the Harry Potter ending sucked. just the epilogue, the rest of the book was awesome, killing off half the cast off-screen was great because that's what happens in war, even if you are clearly the good guys, generally better looking and more likable, you die.
 

DJDarque

Words
Aug 24, 2009
1,776
0
0
I have a few.

1: Harry Potter. Books 1-6 were pretty good, but the entirety of book 7 was garbage. In my opinion it had no redeeming qualities.

2: His Dark Materials. The Golden Compass was amazing. The Subtle Knife was not as great, but still good. And then The Amber Spyglass happened. I know Philip Pullman is an atheist and I know the books were written with an underlying atheist message, but in The Amber Spyglass any idea of subtlety went out the window. It turned a decent series into a ham-fisted atheist jab at the likes of C.S. Lewis' The Chronicles of Narnia.

3. The Redwall Series. It's not that this one ended badly, it's that it is never going to get a proper ending at all. Brian Jacques died after finished the most recent book, The Rogue Crew. I know it would be a difficult series to actually end and I haven't the slightest idea of how it would've worked, but now we'll never know.
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
Anyone here read Legacy of the Force? It's an abysmal series, which is a real shame, because the first three novels in it are AWESOME. I mean, there are millennium falcon bombers, Boba Fett comes out of retirement, and there's two huge space battles.

But after that, everything collapses.
 

Giftfromme

New member
Nov 3, 2011
555
0
0
Shoujin said:
The Ender Series by Orson Scott Card.

The first book was pretty great in my opinion, but each novel after that pretty much gave me one more lump on the head until my IQ hit 0.
lol wow finally a book I've actually read is mentioned. The ending of that book was...interesting. I didn't expect it to get all mystical and shit at the end, but I guess that was necessary. I haven't read the rest of the books, but I can imagine them being shit. The first book was so good as it showed how he was moulded into a general who could defeat the buggers on their home world. It shows how he is young, doesn't want to turn out like his brother, wanted love and acceptance etc. but he can't really have the same journey in the next books. What are the next books about anyway? I'm not going to read them, so you might as well spoil them for me
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
God said:
Only book ending I really didn't enjoy, by which I mean pissed me off to no end is Revan by Drew Karpyshyn. Two characters I love got really crappy endings, and I don't approve of this.
Oh yeah that was bad.
The Exile (I'm not calling her Meetra Surik, god that's a shitty name) gets shanked in the back and falls over dead. That's it. T3-M4 gets turned into a molten pile of metal, and Revan was retconned into being a moron seduced by the darkside instead of one who turned to the dark side to PREVENT the Sith Emperor from invading the galaxy. And then he gets put into a prisoner field so that they can yank him out and put him in The Old Republic as a raid mission. What a dignified ending to two great characters.
 

Blackmagic1515

New member
Jul 6, 2009
778
0
0
Kris015 said:
Blackmagic1515 said:
I'm surprised no one's mentioned Harry Potter yet. I love the book series and then the last one happened. The epilogue SUCKED. Big time.
Why?

I never read the books, but I watched all the movies.
Basically in the epilogue it goes 17 years into the future to Harry/Ginny, Ron/Hermione and Draco putting their oldest kids on the train to Hogwarts. Harry and Draco are now friends with each other. Harry also named his son after not only Dumbledore, but Snape. He shouldn't have, Snape wasn't a tragic hero, he was a git. And in my personal opinion, Harry should have died along with Voldemort. I've never really liked Harry as a character and I think it'd would've been better if he'd died and been remembered as the hero who died destroying Voldemort. I just hated the way she kind of turned it into a 'then everyone lived happily ever after the end' kind of thing.