LordSnakeEyes said:
3- Man is drunk and has sex with an ugly chick (he was consenting *when* he was drunk. Woman gets drunk and has sex she regrets even Remotely and it's "rape".
Let's not throw around words of that caliber with such ease, especially out of place. Some of us have been raped and to see it so flippantly wheeled out and used so incorrectly is not only hurtful, by insulting to many.
If you engage in sex with someone not able to consent, upon their regaining of sufficient mental capacity to decide if they would wish to consent, they chose not to, you are a rapist. Just the same as someone who would abuse a child or the mentally handicap.
ShatteredBlack said:
I think it's actually a quite important issue.
A mate of mine had consensual sex with a girl he picked up in a uni bar. The next day they've both sobered up and she 'remembers' she's got a boyfriend, and suddenly my mate 'raped' her.
The police rocked up, pulled him out of a packed lecture theater and treat him like he's 100% guilty. He gets a court hearing, and after using all his savings defening himself, is aquitted.
She gets off scot free, with not even a 'don't do it again' from the judge, while my mate is down all his savings for uni and is know about the campus as a 'rapist that "got off"'.
This is a terrible travesty, and one that is happening more and more. I understand that it may be a touchy subject, but it's a issue that can't be ignored.
This stereotype disgusts me. Women and men both commit rape and both report false crimes. Would it not be to leave gender and personal bias out of it and deal more with the facts at hand? Perhaps even work to prevent rape and false accusations altogether? I am certain it would be time better spent than further spouting abound this nonexistent double standard of the regretful woman and the drunk man.