Fear

Recommended Videos

Locobato

New member
Sep 18, 2008
82
0
0
Ultrajoe post=18.74435.833865 said:
I do not fear that which is beyond my control.
Must agree, if it's beyond my present sphere of troubles I try not to think about it.
 

darthsmily

New member
Feb 21, 2008
213
0
0
Personally, I am not scared about nuclear apocalypse if I died, but if I somehow survived the aftermath is what I am scared of.
The lack of control is also something that holds fear at bay.
 

RetiarySword

New member
Apr 27, 2008
1,377
0
0
You guys know what missile shields and anti missile fighters are right. The fact that Europe, and the US have the ablitiy to shoot down a nuclear warhead while its still in the 'rouge state'. Personally it won't come to that. World leaders know what nukes do, there not tactical. All they do is kill a massive civilian population. Also if they use theirs, others will use their own, so its mutual destruction. So a nuke is just there to say 'If you shoot me I'll shoot at you back'. Its just a fear weapon with no intention of being used.
 

SmugFrog

Ribbit
Sep 4, 2008
1,239
4
43
No, I try not to think about it. There are so many things that can go wrong in the world or with people that you love and care about. If you spend so much time dwelling on those things, it will surely depress you. The only thing we can do is hope and pray those things never happen.

Here Labyrinth, something for you to think about: The time the Russians almost nuked us. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/russia/closecall/

Not to make you more paranoid about it, but there's just nothing we can do about it - unless you get into a job field that is going to get you in a place of power where you CAN do something about it.

I wish I could watch your video but our work computers block youtube. :(
 

Jaythulhu

New member
Jun 19, 2008
1,745
0
0
I have to admit I'm far more scared of being attacked by a clown than nuclear war. I figure that's going to happen sometime in the next 50 years anyway. Hopefully I'll dead before then, but who knows?

On a side point raised, I though the current accepted model of child protection was to cover them in bubblewrap and tell them all that "there speshal"?

[Edit: I put this back in because I got told off the last time I edited out my drunken ramblings.]
The first thing I thought when I saw the topic was "Fear, surprise, ruthless efficiency, an almost fanatical devotion to the pope and nice red uniforms oh damn!". My closest mate is right. My brain is nothing but a cable tv channel full of old junk. Sigh.
 

Dalisclock

Making lemons combustible again
Legacy
Escapist +
Feb 9, 2008
11,327
7,149
118
A Barrel In the Marketplace
Country
Eagleland
Gender
Male
ThePlasmatizer post=18.74435.833743 said:
Not really, in the current climate if a country was unstable enough to use nuclear weapons against an enemy, I believe it would draw the aggression of the entire United Nations.
Yes, enough that the UN will be very angry and send the culprit a letter saying just how angry they are.
 

Jaythulhu

New member
Jun 19, 2008
1,745
0
0
Dalisclock post=18.74435.834016 said:
Yes, enough that the UN will be very angry and send the culprit a letter saying just how angry they are.
Damn you Hans Brix, you're busting my balls!
 

SmugFrog

Ribbit
Sep 4, 2008
1,239
4
43
Dalisclock post=18.74435.834016 said:
Yes, enough that the UN will be very angry and send the culprit a letter saying just how angry they are.
HAHAHA! That is funny.
 

Johnn Johnston

New member
May 4, 2008
2,519
0
0
If a meteor were to fly towards the Earth, the naked eye could only see it about one second before it hit. Yellowstone National Park is 65km across, and is one gigantic volcano. If the material erupted from Krakatoa was the size of a golf ball, the erupted material from the third-most-recent Yellowstone eruption would be a sphere of diameter 6ft.

The world might end at any second, so I just sit back, relax and hope it doesn't come to it. I'll burn that bridge when I come to it.
 

Easykill

New member
Sep 13, 2007
1,737
0
0
No point really, but I am curious why we need any more nukes right now, the states has the ability to destroy the world many times over with that much firepower. Surely that's enough for them? the next time a nuke is used outside testing, we're pretty much dead as a species. Don't fret.
 

Jobz

New member
May 5, 2008
1,091
0
0
If it were up to me I'd have all nuclear weapons destroyed so that a nuclear war could never take place. But it's not up to me, and because of the paranoia and the sheer stupidity of today's world leaders, there will probably be one at some point in the future. I personally hope it happens when I'm in my sixties, seeing as getting any older than that seems to me like torture (People in my family have never aged well) and I'd love to live to see the end of the world.

I mean, how awesome would it be to witness the end of everything...pretty awesome if you ask me. I'd prefer that to dying in my sleep or something boring of the sort.
 

Spinozaad

New member
Jun 16, 2008
1,106
0
0
The Bomb is such a devastating weapon that it will never be used, as the fear of retaliation is even bigger. No man (not even the fanatical muslims/christians/communists/scientologists, before someone tries to claim otherwise) will ever unleash nuclear war. Using a destructive weapon is one thing, using one of the destructive qualities of a nuclear bomb is another.

That's what kept the Cold War from escalating afteral. Maintaining peace because either side could (and would, in case one would unleash it) destroy the other.

Humans are too obsessed with staying alive, I suppose.
 

hippo24

New member
Apr 29, 2008
702
0
0
What the hell are you talking about, Nuclear war is the only way that I can become a zombie.

and I'll be damned if anyone takes THAT away from me.
 

Easykill

New member
Sep 13, 2007
1,737
0
0
hippo24 post=18.74435.834401 said:
What the hell are you talking about, Nuclear war is the only way that I can become a zombie.

and I'll be damned if anyone takes THAT away from me.
Not at all, that just won't work. You need humanity to survive long enough to screw up with nano-bots.
 

RetiarySword

New member
Apr 27, 2008
1,377
0
0
Richard Groovy Pants post=18.74435.834011 said:
Never heard of tactical nuclear strike did you?
Yea, but what tactical about dropping a bomb on an area to decimate it? 'There is a platoon of enemy troops here! Instead of using clean projectiles lets use a massive bomb what will level the area and make it uninhabitable for a year or two! Thats tactical!!'

*Promoted to 4 star general pops up on right side of screen*
 

Normeo

New member
Sep 11, 2008
93
0
0
Labyrinth post=18.74435.833714 said:
Has anyone else found that the idea of nuclear war scares the pants off them?
CoD 4 to the tune of Dead Flag Blues. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne4KhPRmiVE&feature=related]
No. If it ever did happen, there would be nothing the likes of you or I could do about it, so why worry.
 

hippo24

New member
Apr 29, 2008
702
0
0
Easykill post=18.74435.834505 said:
hippo24 post=18.74435.834401 said:
What the hell are you talking about, Nuclear war is the only way that I can become a zombie.

and I'll be damned if anyone takes THAT away from me.
Not at all, that just won't work. You need humanity to survive long enough to screw up with nano-bots.

Touche...
 

Redlac

New member
Dec 12, 2007
184
0
0
Any apocalyptic situation is scary, be it nuclear war, zombie attack, meteor strike, return of Christ, alien invasion, collider based black hole, disease, huge atomic lizard, return of Cthulu or even the Iron Ninja creating an army of cybernetic armour plated laser-toting chef-hat wearing Apocalypse Crabs. With Spatulas to scrape away the mess.

As scary as it is, I realised there was only two outcomes. I survive, or I don't. There's no point worrying about it, if it happens, I'll probably know in a few seconds which outcome I'll get.