Okay, so.
Spinosaurus.
The pussy ***** of large theropods.
What I of course mean, is that most people assume that unlike it's fellow large theros, this ridiculous animal was likely a piscivore; i.e. it ate fish, rather then hunting large animals. This is pretty apparent in the way it was built, with thin, crocodilian jaws that likely lacked the crushing power to get through the thick muscle and bone of a large herbivore, and fishhook-like claws that lacked the cutting edge they needed to slice through the thick, leathery hide of a dinosaur.
These adaptations were, of course, perfect for catching fish, as were it's raised nostrils and other such semi-aquatic features. So it makes perfect sense that Spinosaurus fed by gorging itself on the many large fish that lived in the same time and place (The area that is now the Sahara Desert, 100 million years ago) rather then hunting big animals like a proper carnivore. Clearly, a wuss.
But I believe it was even worse then that.
Not only do I believe ol' gator-head wasn't a predator - I think it was prey.
I mean, imagine it: you're a Carcharodontosaurus. You are a lean, mean killing machine (And probably have a pack - I mean, there were sauropods around there, and something must have been hunting them, yes?). So, you're out prowling the swamps with your homies, and you see this other dino, some prick with a big dumb fin on his back. He's pretty big, but when you get a look at him, he doesn't look that tough. He's sitting there picking some fish out of his tiny, conical teeth that don't look like they could kill a baby Nigersaur, with the most absurd looking claws you've ever seen, and he has that big sail on his back.
Thing is, that sail would have been a huge liability. Long, thin neural spines that fuse directly into the backbone, so breaking them could cause severe, maybe irreparable spinal damage. And, if we're right about the sail being full of blood vessels, breaking it should also cause Spiny to bleed out, very fast.
So, yeah, you're pretty sure you and your posse can take him. Why wouldn't you go eat him? Well, the answer is that YOU WOULD. Seriously, other large theropods around there would have had no reason to fear Spinosaurus, no reason to compete with it for territory, and NO REASON NOT TO ACTIVELY HUNT, KILL AND EAT IT.
But, it goes even farther then that, and actually gets kind of cool:
So... thoughts?
Spinosaurus.
The pussy ***** of large theropods.
What I of course mean, is that most people assume that unlike it's fellow large theros, this ridiculous animal was likely a piscivore; i.e. it ate fish, rather then hunting large animals. This is pretty apparent in the way it was built, with thin, crocodilian jaws that likely lacked the crushing power to get through the thick muscle and bone of a large herbivore, and fishhook-like claws that lacked the cutting edge they needed to slice through the thick, leathery hide of a dinosaur.
These adaptations were, of course, perfect for catching fish, as were it's raised nostrils and other such semi-aquatic features. So it makes perfect sense that Spinosaurus fed by gorging itself on the many large fish that lived in the same time and place (The area that is now the Sahara Desert, 100 million years ago) rather then hunting big animals like a proper carnivore. Clearly, a wuss.
But I believe it was even worse then that.
Not only do I believe ol' gator-head wasn't a predator - I think it was prey.
I mean, imagine it: you're a Carcharodontosaurus. You are a lean, mean killing machine (And probably have a pack - I mean, there were sauropods around there, and something must have been hunting them, yes?). So, you're out prowling the swamps with your homies, and you see this other dino, some prick with a big dumb fin on his back. He's pretty big, but when you get a look at him, he doesn't look that tough. He's sitting there picking some fish out of his tiny, conical teeth that don't look like they could kill a baby Nigersaur, with the most absurd looking claws you've ever seen, and he has that big sail on his back.
Thing is, that sail would have been a huge liability. Long, thin neural spines that fuse directly into the backbone, so breaking them could cause severe, maybe irreparable spinal damage. And, if we're right about the sail being full of blood vessels, breaking it should also cause Spiny to bleed out, very fast.
So, yeah, you're pretty sure you and your posse can take him. Why wouldn't you go eat him? Well, the answer is that YOU WOULD. Seriously, other large theropods around there would have had no reason to fear Spinosaurus, no reason to compete with it for territory, and NO REASON NOT TO ACTIVELY HUNT, KILL AND EAT IT.
But, it goes even farther then that, and actually gets kind of cool:
You see, realizing this got me thinking about how Finny would protect itself from predation. And at this point, I started to go into the really weird side of my theory: what if Spinosaurus existed symbiotically with herbivores? A few Spinos living with a large herd of sauropods or iguanodonts, watching each other's backs, maybe with alternating senses; say, a herd of Ouranosaurs with very good senses of smell, backed by a few of the tall Spinos with their big, craning necks to keep an eye on the horizon and see over the treetops.
And THAT got me thinking about the purpose of the sails.
We don't really know what the sails were for; both Spinosaurus and Ouranosaurus carried them, but... why? Thermoregulation? For WARM-BLOODED ANIMALS? In AFRICA? A form of display makes sense, but it does seem like an odd coincidence, no, these two COMPLETELY UNRELATED Dinosaur genera developing these sails AT THE SAME TIME?
And so I though... what if it's an inter-herd communication thing? Like, if a member of either species spots or smells trouble, they flare up the sail another color, and alert the rest?
The next part really gets pretty farfetched, but I even had an idea that the two may have helped each other gather food: maybe Ouranos splashed around in the river to scare up fish, and maybe Spinos used their impressive height and hooked claws to pull down high tree branches.
And THAT got me thinking about the purpose of the sails.
We don't really know what the sails were for; both Spinosaurus and Ouranosaurus carried them, but... why? Thermoregulation? For WARM-BLOODED ANIMALS? In AFRICA? A form of display makes sense, but it does seem like an odd coincidence, no, these two COMPLETELY UNRELATED Dinosaur genera developing these sails AT THE SAME TIME?
And so I though... what if it's an inter-herd communication thing? Like, if a member of either species spots or smells trouble, they flare up the sail another color, and alert the rest?
The next part really gets pretty farfetched, but I even had an idea that the two may have helped each other gather food: maybe Ouranos splashed around in the river to scare up fish, and maybe Spinos used their impressive height and hooked claws to pull down high tree branches.
So... thoughts?