Female Gamers: Are you tired of being presented with no dignity?

Evan Waters

New member
Dec 12, 2007
94
0
0
squid5580 said:
It isn't objectionable. Did those character's you listed games bomb? So my point still remains that there are games that do use "normal" females as well as games that use "hot" ones. So we have already achieved what this topic was about. Now the peasants can rejoice.
Not that easy. The thin, busty, wisecracking, scantily clad, fully made-up type is still treated as the "default" for female characters, with the examples I listed as exceptions. There are still a lot of companies with narrow perceptions of women in gaming (both as players and characters), and it would be to the industry's benefit if we went against that.

Seriously, I saw a video from Bonus Round commentating on E3, and Dan Hsu has a bit where he's saying he felt "castrated" by parts of Nintendo's presentation focusing on DS games like Women's Mystery Club and Style Savvy. Not all women are into those sorts of games, obviously, there are plenty of "hardcore" female fans, but the "Eww, something not aimed at me!" attitude struck me as over the top. There's a really weird "Must be macho" attitude among gamers, which I find at least ironic since we're all sitting around indoors playing with controllers. It's one thing to like the macho stuff, it's another to be actively hostile towards anything targeted at another demographic, and I think it shows a certain frat boy mentality at large in the gaming world.
 

quack35

New member
Sep 1, 2008
2,197
0
0
This thread is kind of funny now considering the advertising to the left of the board.
 

Kurokami

New member
Feb 23, 2009
2,352
0
0
sabaducia said:
I would usually keep this within the Girl Gamer group... but just in case you haven't joined, or you didn't know it existed, I thought I'd share one of our rants with the rest of the escapist.
From characters to covers, women are repeastedly represented in unrealistic, often impossible (according to physics and anatomy) ways, that are completely IRRELEVENT to their characters. So none of those "What about Superman's chest?" comebacks. He has to be strong to beat the crap out of people, you don't need GG breasts and a leather suit to be a kick-butt lady.
SO girls, what are your thoughts?
PS - I am not saying females are ALWAYS presented this way, just most of the time. A *big* most.
Don't know if you've read some of the other threads on here, but some of us guys aren't too keen on being targeted by big breasts as selling points either. However, if the majority of the male population does find it appealing then you can surely understand where they'd feel the need to utilize it. I've got nothing against girl gamers (apart from the fact that I always assume them to be guys) but there's no denying that males (unfortunately) seem to be more dominant in influencing video gaming, much as they are in most aspects of the world.

However, just for the superman argument, sure, but do you think my muscles would be as small as his if I could lift an airplane? In video games some of the chicks there are strong as hell, maybe we should model them after body builders. (That's not to say you're wrong)
 

Halfbreed13

New member
Apr 21, 2009
1,066
0
0
quack35 said:
This thread is kind of funny now considering the advertising to the left of the board.
A cookie for you!

But seriously? This thread is obnoxious. What about the Prince stripping randomly in SoT. Did guys ***** because of the fanservice? No? Because that is what it is. ECCHI-esque FANSERVICE. If you take this shit seriously, you are either overthinking it or just looking for something to be angry about.
 

Evan Waters

New member
Dec 12, 2007
94
0
0
Halfbreed13 said:
But seriously? This thread is obnoxious. What about the Prince stripping randomly in SoT. Did guys ***** because of the fanservice? No? Because that is what it is. ECCHI-esque FANSERVICE. If you take this shit seriously, you are either overthinking it or just looking for something to be angry about.
Yes, ONE instance of beefcake clearly disproves the existence of sexism in the videogame industry. Huzzah.

(And of course, part of the reason they made the Prince all dark and edgy in the sequel was because they needed to appeal more to the men. See also, whatever the fuck that was that Shahdee was wearing.)
 

Lyri

New member
Dec 8, 2008
2,660
0
0
sabaducia said:
I would usually keep this within the Girl Gamer group... but just in case you haven't joined, or you didn't know it existed, I thought I'd share one of our rants with the rest of the escapist.
From characters to covers, women are repeastedly represented in unrealistic, often impossible (according to physics and anatomy) ways, that are completely IRRELEVENT to their characters. So none of those "What about Superman's chest?" comebacks. He has to be strong to beat the crap out of people, you don't need GG breasts and a leather suit to be a kick-butt lady.
SO girls, what are your thoughts?
PS - I am not saying females are ALWAYS presented this way, just most of the time. A *big* most.
Well, err...hate to say it but why care that much?
Men are portreyed in just the same way as your 'impossible women', so it's not like your the gender that's also being hard done too here.
As an average white guy, I'm never going to be half as muscle bound or chisled like the guys I see in video games.

It's not a gender problem that we have here, it's a reality problem in all fairness.
That's why we play games though, we're not here to play
'John & Jill Mc'average buys a kitchen'
We're all playing
'Major Muscles and Countess Cleveage kill Dracula and the Nazi zombies of doom'
People are portrayed in the most hilarious and impossible ways in video games and I really wish you femenists would just drop the old.
"Her tits are too big and she's too pretty arguement".
 
Mar 26, 2008
3,429
0
0
The new look Max Payne has a very realistic body type for a guy and yet there were people complaining he's carrying too much extra padding (which I found a bit insulting given I have a very similar build).

[link]http://cache.g4tv.com/ImageDb3/162066_S/Heres-Your-First-Glimpse-At-Max-Paynes-New-Look.jpg[/link]

You just can't win.
 

Halo Fanboy

New member
Nov 2, 2008
1,118
0
0
I still think that counting a characters looks as more than a minor complaint to be extremely shallow. I try not to judge characters by their appearances, and don't want anyone else to do so either.
 

Lemur_Ninja

New member
Aug 6, 2009
164
0
0
Although I'm not a female, I feel that I must stress that not all male gamers don't give dignity to female players. I personally give respect to all players, up until the point where they make an insulting comment. Although I have met few female players willing to speak in-game, I feel that they really don't get enough respect. Every time I join a multiplayer game, other players, and my some of my moronic friends, repeatedly make unneeded sexist comments. I just wish more male players would actually think before making such comments.
 

Aqualung

New member
Mar 11, 2009
2,946
0
0
I like how, while I'm reading through this topic, there's some Crimecraft wallpaper on the Escapist with a woman that most men have probably already taken a long look at.

Heh. Irony is super.
 

MiracleOfSound

Fight like a Krogan
Jan 3, 2009
17,776
0
0
Men are mis-represented equally in gaming.

Most hardcore gamers are NOT muscle bound, olympian killing machines. We tend to be a bit skinny, or a little overweight, and the quiet nerdy type.

How do you think it makes us feel to be bombarded constantly with these Herculean titanic muscle monsters with thier rugged good looks and bulging biceps?

Most media mis represents genders, gaming is no different.

[goes back to admiring Kratos's loincloth]
 

squid5580

Elite Member
Feb 20, 2008
5,106
0
41
Evan Waters said:
squid5580 said:
It isn't objectionable. Did those character's you listed games bomb? So my point still remains that there are games that do use "normal" females as well as games that use "hot" ones. So we have already achieved what this topic was about. Now the peasants can rejoice.
Not that easy. The thin, busty, wisecracking, scantily clad, fully made-up type is still treated as the "default" for female characters, with the examples I listed as exceptions. There are still a lot of companies with narrow perceptions of women in gaming (both as players and characters), and it would be to the industry's benefit if we went against that.

Seriously, I saw a video from Bonus Round commentating on E3, and Dan Hsu has a bit where he's saying he felt "castrated" by parts of Nintendo's presentation focusing on DS games like Women's Mystery Club and Style Savvy. Not all women are into those sorts of games, obviously, there are plenty of "hardcore" female fans, but the "Eww, something not aimed at me!" attitude struck me as over the top. There's a really weird "Must be macho" attitude among gamers, which I find at least ironic since we're all sitting around indoors playing with controllers. It's one thing to like the macho stuff, it's another to be actively hostile towards anything targeted at another demographic, and I think it shows a certain frat boy mentality at large in the gaming world.
It is that easy. If every game that came along with a female lead was as described throughout this thread then it would be. The simple fact that

A) Not all games are made in America or in the West there will be some cultural differences. It may not be the same as your culture but to be so closeminded is truly pathetic.

B) Games are not one size fits all. There will be games that don't appeal to certain people. And for all those who whine about as you put it "Eww, something not aimed at me!" must struggle in any store outside of specialty stores. I mean all those shelves lined with stuff that doesn't appeal to them directly must make thier heads explode.

The way I see this it isn't about games or what female characters wear. This is about the arrogance of a "minority" group who found something that doesn't appeal to them so they must attempt to abolish it.
 

squid5580

Elite Member
Feb 20, 2008
5,106
0
41
Cheeze_Pavilion said:
squid5580 said:
Cheeze_Pavilion said:
You mean once I adopt your definition of the difference uncritically, we can talk.

Also, how is that relevant to the to the first two things I said?
You really want me to answer them ok. My point was there are tons of games that don't use sex appeal to sell. TONS. Just because you can pick one or 2 out of millions of titles is just stererotypical BS trying to make a point.
Granting that for the sake of argument, what about my other option--that it *was* true at one time, but is not true any longer?

EDIT: And again--I thought you said you're always too busy typing about how "hordes of sex depraved gamers" is a stereotype--what problem is being caused by a "built in need to reproduce" if gamers are not a "horde" (i.e. those 'millions who run out to buy') of people who are "sex depraved"?

You said a while back:

Just because developers make women in games well endowed and scantily clothed doesn't affect sales all that much. Did X-Blades hit the top of the charts? Is SF4 getting it's ass kicked by SC4? No because of one simple reason. The MC and the clothes they may or may not wear mean nothing until someone shines a huge political spotlight on it and makes a big deal about nothing.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/9.138610.3132079

In one comment you're telling me these things "don't affect sales all that much," and later you're telling me about how "we run out in the millions to buy" these kinds of games because of a "need to reproduce that is causing the problem." What exactly are you trying to say, because it seems you're contradicting yourself.



2. SARCASM. Look it up, memorize the meaning then try again.
I'm sorry--I thought this was supposed to be a rational discussion, not a sarcasm competition.
To have a rational discussion you would need to at least attempt to be rational instead of perpetuating the debate with stupidity. Afterall denying the fact that there are games in existance that don't portray women in such a fashion tosses any rationality right out the window.
 

YuheJi

New member
Mar 17, 2009
927
0
0
miracleofsound said:
Men are mis-represented equally in gaming.

Most hardcore gamers are NOT muscle bound, olympian killing machines. We tend to be a bit skinny, or a little overweight, and the quiet nerdy type.

How do you think it makes us feel to be bombarded constantly with these Herculean titanic muscle monsters with thier rugged good looks and bulging biceps?

Most media mis represents genders, gaming is no different.

[goes back to admiring Kratos's loincloth]
I think you're attacking a straw man. Being misrepresented is not the same thing as being portrayed with no dignity.
 

Samurai Goomba

New member
Oct 7, 2008
3,679
0
0
Cheeze_Pavilion said:
Samurai Goomba said:
Or maybe as graphics got better, it was easier for male nerds to create their dream girls?
Good call.
That kind of explains how this stuff started out, but not how it became so mainstream. Unless, of course, the male-dominated games industry didn't start to see any kind of problem with the majority of their games featuring cheesecake until recently. Probably coinciding when the release of games like DDR and an increased interest from women in games. It'd be interesting to see an actual timeline on this.

After all, video games were dominated by males in the SNES/N64/PS1 era, too. But we didn't have quite the "DoA women everywhere" problem we do now.

Or maybe male nerds didn't notice the fantasy wish fulfillment potential of games until recently. Perhaps the correlation between sexual fantasy and virtual worlds didn't happen 'till a few years ago.
That's a great game I think to illustrate the difference. The game is about, well, the crazy-ass things that go on deep in our psyche. So it makes sense for there to be some crazy sexual imagery going on with the shadow selves. It's not so much nudity or lack of clothing or even sexualizaion of the characters going on--the OP was talking about when it's both *irrelevant* and removes the characters dignity. All the sexuality in Persona is not only relevant, it's responsible for the dungeons and the bosses. And any indignity is, well, relevant too--the whole game is about the idea of...personas and identity and all kinds of psychological stuff.


As for the jailbait aspect, I think that's more along the lines of Artemis, the Virgin Huntress than jailbait. The idea of the first stage of womanhood when she's not a child, but isn't 'domesticated' by man/civilization yet. The stage right before the onset of the problems described in Reviving Ophelia.
Yeah, I knew starting out that Persona 4 would be a poor representation of "sexist" games. But I can't think of many modern titles I would equate with Chrono Trigger, masterpiece that it is. But you have to admit that the tiny skirts really add nothing to the game. The sexuality that matters to the plot is mostly in the alternate "worlds." The only reason the skirts are so short is a blatant ripping from anime style, which is in itself VERY sexist at times.

Alright, well... Here's a better example (of sexism in games). In Devil May Cry 3, the only woman in the game wears Lara Croft-styled short shorts and a t-shirt. But her proportions are reasonable and she's not even all that attractive. Kind of scruffy and scarred. She's a tough chick, but also feminine. Kind of a Sigourney Weaver sort of character.

In contrast, Bayonetta. Do I really need to say anything else?

The games are even made by the same company? What happened in that gap of time between the development of the two games that Capcom felt such obvious pandering to sweaty males was necessary? And yeah, there's the succubus in DMC3, but her state of undress is entirely fitting with the mythology surrounding her character, when you really think about it.

I have porn for porn. I have games for... Not porn.

Wait, if DoA is porn-lite and I payed money for Dead or Alive 3, does that mean I actually spent MONEY on porn? In an age with the Internet? I feel silly now.

Mmm hmm. My solution is to recognize it for what it is: porn-lite. Just like Fabio on the cover of a romance novel or the way men are portrayed in soap operas. Because then I can enjoy it, but I can also recognize why it's as perfectly acceptable for a woman not to want to play that game as for me not to want to play a game where Voldo is more than just one crazy character.

Porn is good. And porn gets to operate according to different rules--it's free of the need to appeal to everyone. However, that also means porn excludes people, so you don't tell people just to 'ignore it' or act like it's not porn when it is.
Yeah, but it's frustrating to me, because I'd love Dead or Alive just as much if everyone wore parkas and hip-waders. I play DoA: Ultimate to have fun, and it's NOT fun for me when I see such blatant sexuality in a game where it serves no purpose. If it were just limited to the cinemas and endings, I'd have no problem. But Kasumi, for example, is a really fun character to use. Her moves are original and cool. Yet everytime I use her, it's a struggle just to locate a costume which doesn't make me feel like a pimp.
 

Boxmeister

New member
Jun 27, 2009
86
0
0
So I think we've covered that guys are just as foolishly portrayed as women, but do you men look at someone like Kratos and think that it's undignified? That it's unrealistic and downright silly to expect to measure up to such "buff standards"? (Don't connote that I myself am leading to a yes or no answer, this really is just a question looking for a riposte)
 

Whistler777

New member
Nov 14, 2008
529
0
0
I think it's fine that women are portrayed this way in gaming, as games themselves are mostly marketed toward a male audience. That's not to say that I endorse chauvinism, or that I'm anywhere on the level of Team Ninja's love for rendered cleavage, but it's something that is simply impossible to get rid of. Sure, people will continue to complain about it on and on through the years, but I'm resigned to the idea that arguing an impossible cause is a waste of time.