Damnit science... can't we all just agree murdering eachother in cold blood is better than creating a robotic enemy to fight?
sexbots. all the sexbots. Just think of all the unemployment as prostitutes are pushed out of business. we must destroy robots now!Samtemdo8 said:Removing the context of Blade Runner or any other Sci-Fi genre.
I never understood the purpose of making Robots that look nearly exact like Humans?
I mean what purpose does it serve, what will humanity gain making Robots that look exactly like us?
What makes sexbots any different compared to just wanking to "fanart"Strazdas said:So why instead of making good efficient robots are they trying to replicate humans of all things? I wish my conciuosness could be downloaded to a robot, but i would not want it to just be another human replication.
sexbots. all the sexbots. Just think of all the unemployment as prostitutes are pushed out of business. we must destroy robots now!Samtemdo8 said:Removing the context of Blade Runner or any other Sci-Fi genre.
I never understood the purpose of making Robots that look nearly exact like Humans?
I mean what purpose does it serve, what will humanity gain making Robots that look exactly like us?
What makes sexbots any different compared to just wanking to "fanart"[/quote]Samtemdo8 said:sexbots. all the sexbots. Just think of all the unemployment as prostitutes are pushed out of business. we must destroy robots now!
I really hope you're right, cause this kind of shit worries me when I think about it. Cause what are the chances we create something like this in our own image and it turns out to be kind?IamLEAM1983 said:I always find these things suspicious. These responses are so articulate, so long, that I can't imagine they weren't pre-programmed entirely. In which case, there's no self-determination happening, no real choice being made - and you're left with a regular machine carrying out its programmed directives. It's a bit weird to see robotics specialists gush over stuff like this when we're still leagues and bounds away from Roy Batty or Nick Valentine.
Futurists like Ray Kurzweil tend to say we're decades away from a conscious android, but I'm much more pessimistic. I'd give it a century at the very least. AI research isn't that old, and we're essentially trying to reproduce something that's nuanced and extremely complex - the human mind. An AI mastering Go doesn't make it humanlike; you don't need much in the way of sapience to master Go. High-functioning autistic people can play a reasonable game of Go while being unable to process all of an average day's human interactions.
I'll be impressed on the day one of these androids breaks free from its programmers' intended showreel and does something that's actually emergent. Not before.
Are you kidding me, even actual human beings on advertisement posters often fail in this regard.Gibbagobba said:Good lord, that thing is damn creepy. Why can't they ever get these things to smile without looking like a serial killer? It's that toothy grin and those wide, soulless eyes every time.
Physical contact. Fanart cannot touch you. Sexbots can.[/quote]Strazdas said:What makes sexbots any different compared to just wanking to "fanart"Samtemdo8 said:sexbots. all the sexbots. Just think of all the unemployment as prostitutes are pushed out of business. we must destroy robots now!
True, but you cant have "real organic hole" in your cupboard and do with it whatever/whenever you want.Samtemdo8 said:Still not the same as sticking it in a real organic hole.Strazdas said:Physical contact. Fanart cannot touch you. Sexbots can.
I beg to differ.Strazdas said:True, but you cant have "real organic hole" in your cupboard and do with it whatever/whenever you want.Samtemdo8 said:Still not the same as sticking it in a real organic hole.Strazdas said:Physical contact. Fanart cannot touch you. Sexbots can.
Neither is a Fleshlight; they still sell.Samtemdo8 said:Still not the same as sticking it in a real organic hole.
Again why do we need robots like the ones we see in the movie I-Robot.shrekfan246 said:Neither is a Fleshlight; they still sell.Samtemdo8 said:Still not the same as sticking it in a real organic hole.
OT: Of course, all of these jokes people make about robots destroying humanity are really going to come flying back in our faces if robots ever do gain sentience.
Not that they should be the go-to source for all things scientific given the fact that very few actual scientists likely vetted this, but as Aperture's Cave Johnson says, "Science isn't about 'why', it's about 'why not'!"Samtemdo8 said:Again why do we need robots like the ones we see in the movie I-Robot.shrekfan246 said:Neither is a Fleshlight; they still sell.Samtemdo8 said:Still not the same as sticking it in a real organic hole.
OT: Of course, all of these jokes people make about robots destroying humanity are really going to come flying back in our faces if robots ever do gain sentience.
The only form of Robotics I would think plausible and have a use is mech vehicles, And I mean the more realistic and plausible kind like a Walker:
http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/5/5a/AT-RT-TCW.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20100826153545
Not something like this:
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/10/108342/3774006-gundam_standing.jpg
As creepy as it may be, there's a lot of research going into projects like this for Human-Robot Interactions (HRI). One main driver is that we're running into an issue of a rapidly-aging population with a lack of qualified/interested healthcare staff to support them. Countries like Japan are betting heavily on the hopes that automation can solve this problem, but conventional robotic aesthetics tend to turn people off from the idea. As much as we like to think we're logic-driven individuals, we're much more likely to positively respond to something like this [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-lITdDUUAABLWi.jpg] handling our grandparents than something like this. [http://www.mathworks.com/cmsimages/73605_wm_utoronto_user_story.jpg] I did some work for a university that had performed tests to see if the elderly could be mentally stimulated by little guys like this [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwWeN1ARy74] to help maintain their social cognitive abilities. The field still has a long way to go, but the eventual goal (as dysptopian as it may sound) is to have mostly self-sufficient senior care. Other service industries would also love to have a passable social robot that can handle angry customers without issue, never sleeps, and functions purely on pennies of electricity.Samtemdo8 said:Again why do we need robots like the ones we see in the movie I-Robot.
But than wouldn't robots like that taking forms of work and labor hinder human economies?shado_temple said:As creepy as it may be, there's a lot of research going into projects like this for Human-Robot Interactions (HRI). One main driver is that we're running into an issue of a rapidly-aging population with a lack of qualified/interested healthcare staff to support them. Countries like Japan are betting heavily on the hopes that automation can solve this problem, but conventional robotic aesthetics tend to turn people off from the idea. As much as we like to think we're logic-driven individuals, we're much more likely to positively respond to something like this [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-lITdDUUAABLWi.jpg] handling our grandparents than something like this. [http://www.mathworks.com/cmsimages/73605_wm_utoronto_user_story.jpg] I did some work for a university that had performed tests to see if the elderly could be mentally stimulated by little guys like this [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwWeN1ARy74] to help maintain their social cognitive abilities. The field still has a long way to go, but the eventual goal (as dysptopian as it may sound) is to have mostly self-sufficient senior care. Other service industries would also love to have a passable social robot that can handle angry customers without issue, never sleeps, and functions purely on pennies of electricity.Samtemdo8 said:Again why do we need robots like the ones we see in the movie I-Robot.