James Ennever said:
This whole debate over a bunch of petty chauvinistic virgin?s vs a blogging feminist with a habit of shitty research has me in a conundrum.
If I agree I am also agreeing to her view that all her other videos are good and well thought out arguments.
Uh, no it doesn't. It means you agree with something she said.
If I disagree I face being crucified by people jumping to the conclusion I am a women hater which I am most certainly not.
While that may happen, you disagreeing with a thing she said doesn't make you a woman hater. It just means you disagree with a thing she said.
The whole idea that if you agree with one thing someone said, you agree with everything they say is just fucking
stupid. I'm not saying you're stupid OP, just the idea that if you agree/disagree with something someone said/did you agree/disagree with everything they say/do. It's a horrible way to think and needs to fucking stop.
It's fine to agree with someone and still point out flaws they make, or disagree with something they say and
not fall into the opposite extreme.
Sorry, had to rant a little there.
As for the whole LEGO thing, well youtube's being lame to me and won't load the videos, so I don't really know what it's all about. That being said, I don't think there's sexism in the toys themselves, but I have seen "gender targeted" ads for 'em. Mainly "girls get the pink set, boys get the blue." That sort of thing. Though that was a long time ago. Maybe it's still around, maybe it isn't. I don't know, but I would't be surprised if it was.