I punched a chav who I later found out was only like 12, I was mortified but still somewhat proud as he threw a stone at me.
Not necessarily. In fact, there have been many, many cases where a "martial artist" has been beaten by Joe Random. If you're trained to fight in a very unrealistic and impractical way and have no real experience, then someone's simply going to punch you in the face.HBrutusH post=18.69524.664251 said:That's true, however a martial artist is still more likely to be a more proficient fighter than your average Joe hoodie.
I've fought Joe Random's before using martial arts and destroyed them pretty easily. If someone has no martial arts experience, or little, and is within about 50 pounds of me, I can usually win pretty easily (mostly because I just love to fight).frontier psychiatrist post=18.69524.664264 said:Not necessarily. In fact, there have been many, many cases where a "martial artist" has been beaten by Joe Random. If you're trained to fight in a very unrealistic and impractical way and have no real experience, then someone's simply going to punch you in the face.HBrutusH post=18.69524.664251 said:That's true, however a martial artist is still more likely to be a more proficient fighter than your average Joe hoodie.
frontier psychiatrist post=18.69524.664264 said:Not necessarily. In fact, there have been many, many cases where a "martial artist" has been beaten by Joe Random. If you're trained to fight in a very unrealistic and impractical way and have no real experience, then someone's simply going to punch you in the face.
That.Ares Tyr post=18.69524.664504 said:Words! Jeez!
You didn't have to write an essay about it. I thought it went without saying that it depends on the person and the school. I was specifically talking about "martial artists" whose training is at best useless and at worst counter-productive.Ares Tyr post=18.69524.664504 said:Again, the lesson of this long essay is "Yes and no, it depends on the person and school".
It's a popular myth that you just "can't" fight multiple attackers for some magical mystery reason. There are a lot of variables involved, and there's certainly nothing outrageous about defeating several attackers.Its not that outrageous, but it involves taking on multiple people in weight lifting class.
It really wasn't that. I did that once, just to fuck around and show people how cool I am (its not that hard, I'd rather take on three shitty fighters than one great one, its all about standing in the right place). But in this situation, I was trying to convince people that "just because you're stronger than I am doesn't mean you're a better fighter than I am". I did this by taking three guys whom bench-pressed something like fifty pounds more than me, and subsequently submitting them one after the other in one on one wrestling/grappling matches. Two were wrestlers and the third was a reported "good street fighter". I gained several people's respect in doing so, because it was like, my second week at a new school.frontier psychiatrist post=18.69524.664565 said:You didn't have to write an essay about it. I thought it went without saying that it depends on the person and the school. I was specifically talking about "martial artists" whose training is at best useless and at worst counter-productive.Ares Tyr post=18.69524.664504 said:Again, the lesson of this long essay is "Yes and no, it depends on the person and school".
It's a popular myth that you just "can't" fight multiple attackers for some magical mystery reason. There are a lot of variables involved, and there's certainly nothing outrageous about defeating several attackers.Its not that outrageous, but it involves taking on multiple people in weight lifting class.
Oh. I thought you were defending yourself against multiple attackers (that might have turned out to be quite brutal considering all the improvised weaponry you can find in a gym).Ares Tyr post=18.69524.664575 said:I did this by taking three guys whom bench-pressed something like fifty pounds more than me, and subsequently submitting them one after the other in one on one wrestling/grappling matches.
Yeah, that probably wouldn't have turned out to well for me, haha. But I've fought multiple people at once. Notably during my black belt test it was required for two on one or three on one sparring. During two on one with two adult men, I kicked one of them in the mouth and out of comission for a little while, I felt bad. The other was my good friend and red-neck street fighter who wouldn't have any of that shit, haha. It was fun.frontier psychiatrist post=18.69524.664593 said:Oh. I thought you were defending yourself against multiple attackers (that might have turned out to be quite brutal considering all the improvised weaponry you can find in a gym).Ares Tyr post=18.69524.664575 said:I did this by taking three guys whom bench-pressed something like fifty pounds more than me, and subsequently submitting them one after the other in one on one wrestling/grappling matches.
So basically you could kill any of us at any time.Ares Tyr post=18.69524.663180 said:Long, more interesting answer
Oh, the drama. It's not like he's the only person in the world who practises martial arts.meatloaf231 post=18.69524.664660 said:So basically you could kill any of us at any time.Ares Tyr post=18.69524.663180 said:Long, more interesting answer
*backs away slowly*
That's right you should be scared! FEAR ME!!!frontier psychiatrist post=18.69524.664675 said:Oh, the drama. It's not like he's the only person in the world who practises martial arts.meatloaf231 post=18.69524.664660 said:So basically you could kill any of us at any time.Ares Tyr post=18.69524.663180 said:Long, more interesting answer
*backs away slowly*