First thoughts on using OnLive

Recommended Videos

migo

New member
Jun 27, 2010
2,697
0
0
So OnLive just canned their plans for subscription fee, which is just as well as I was feeling slightly ripped off that the founding members program was only available to Americans when I'm 2 hours away from Seattle. It's mainly interesting to me for running games on my NetBook, which is what I did.

-Connected over WiFi, and it worked overall but 2 times in 45 minutes the connection quality lowered to the point that the game stalled. A bit annoying, hopefully they'll work it out, or maybe I'll have to buy a long ethernet cable.

-I didn't check bandwidth usage before starting, which I should have, but after 45 minutes of play I didn't see anything to suggest there was huge usage, so one of the concerns I had that I'd need to buy additional bandwidth probably won't be an issue.

-Having Batman Arkham Asylum run perfectly smooth without troubles on a Netbook with a 1.6GHz Atom and integrated graphics was pretty sweet.

-The software selection is small, the optional 3 day and 5 day passes seem fairly pointless given the available titles. I can't think of anything other than Akrham Asylum that I'd want to buy, so it's by no means a replacement for another console, or even a gaming PC, really only useful if your system doesn't have the specs to handle it.

-Controls are detected without configuration, I plugged in my Cyborg P3200 gamepad, it detected without a fuss and the on screen hints immediately switched to telling me what I needed to use.

I can see it having potential for me - 1 or 2 good titles on my netbook is pretty nifty, I wouldn't be playing them all that much so the bandwidth usage shouldn't be an issue, and it might turn out to be quite appealing to people who have older systems, like a P4 or Athlon XP, or anything with Intel graphics. With a new generation of gamers being used to playing everything in their browser, downloading a client might not seem like such a big deal and might actually be worth it compared to figuring out what they want to buy for a solid gaming PC. MMORPGs could also work really well. I wouldn't mind seeing Guild Wars 2 on it.
 

Sonofadiddly

New member
Dec 19, 2009
516
0
0
I just heard about OnLive (thanks to the Escapist), and I'm totally stoked. I can play games on a computer without having to shell out thousands of dollars? It's like a dream come true. I'm going to sign up for the free trial right now! And by that I mean tomorrow, because it's my bed time.
 

StBishop

New member
Sep 22, 2009
3,249
0
0
Not chuffed with it. I like physical copies of my games.

I'd rather go without gaming on the PC.

Incidentally this laptop only has KotOR on it.

I've not played any other games on PC since.... March last year? My gaming PC died and I've had other things to spend my money on, like food.
 

migo

New member
Jun 27, 2010
2,697
0
0
These days with DRM a physical copy is rather meaningless. I'd rather have a game registered with both GamersGate and Impulse so I can download from either one than rely on optical media that can get scratched and/or lost and that I can't resell anyway.

Got some more playthrough done. Quite a few more disconnects, again about 45 minutes and it seems to hit around 2GB/hour for bandwidth usage, so one more thing that puts it as not a primary gaming system for me, but a nice backup for 1 or 2 extra games.

A really neat feature is the arena which lets you watch other people playing, which is pretty convenient for getting a feel for the game - something to go with youtube reviews and other sources of information. Seeing which games are getting played the most is also something of an indicator of which ones might be worth buying.

I'm definitely hoping that WiFi improves, because one of the appeals is portable gaming - take a netbook out at a coffee shop with free WiFi and get some gaming in, but if I need a wired connection for it to be reliable I end up just playing on a small screen and there's little point.

I've also read up on what other people have said, and the point about it working best with small screens is probably true. I've got 1024x576 resolution, so having it be designed for 720p and downscale a bit actually works all right and I find the graphic quality to be fine. Hooking it up to a large TV with the microconsole though could quite conceivably put out a pretty ugly picture compared to a PS3 or 360.
 
Jul 22, 2009
3,593
0
0
Yeah I still want my hard copy. I would've tried out OnLive but it's only available in America.

Plus it's not for hardcore gamers so I'll count myself out...
 

migo

New member
Jun 27, 2010
2,697
0
0
They haven't yet. There's a problem with it though at the moment though-

OnLive outputs games at 720p, which is fine on a smaller computer monitor, but would look pretty crappy on TV.

There are actually a number of problems like that - 720p is fine for the casual gamer, but in North America 3mbps connections are for technophiles. Furthermore, 3mbps connections are normal in Sweden and Korea, making OnLive a great service for people who travel, but it doesn't work there.

Given the resolution, it's best suited to netbooks and subnotebooks, up to 13", but on something like that WiFi would work best, and this isn't OnLive's fault - WiFi will just never be 100% reliable - an ethernet connection is best.

So basically OnLive is best suited to college students. You're living in a dorm so you don't want to take much with you, and you've got a subnotebook for taking notes in class. The subnotebook has integrated graphics because battery life and portability is more important than gaming to you. You have a wired connection in your dorm, and the college has very fast internet, and if you're on WiFi there's a single connection blanketing the campus, so you don't have tons of routers interfering with each other.

Other than that, I think you're looking at around 5 years or so for it to really take off - when they have servers around the world to actually be of benefit to travellers, and when internet connections are generally fast enough that a casual user can make use of it. Right now I think it's only of interest for people who like doing beta testing and just being on the bleeding edge of technology, quirks and all - and the aforementioned college students.