Nieroshai said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Football American Football link here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tailgate_party Cookoffs
and by den party I mean a party with snacks and stuff held in the living room. And no, I do NOT hear about American Football riots on a regular basis, and a superbowl riot would make headlines as an outrageous and terrible break from the norm. Whereas international football seems to escalate fans to a destructive rage on a regular basis. Hell, the Vancouver riot was such an oddity it made headlines, and that's Canadian hockey!
Should've responded to this a while ago.
*ahem* While your assessment of the two football systems and their respective fanbases may seem correct, there is context to consider, as well as the size of the fanbases. American football only really receives widespread coverage in two countries: America & Japan; most (if not all) other leagues are amateur and receive little, if any, media exposure. However, association football has leagues in 208 countries, the vast majority of which are professional, hence the probability of partisan/nationalistic behaviour is much higher. And there is the national rivalry (England v Scotland/Germany/France, Germany v France/Holland, Argentina v Brazil etc.) which would make any potential trouble even worse. I don't recall a match ever occurring (even an exhibition match) between all-star NFL/X-L teams, though I may be wrong.
By nation, trouble at football matches is as common as trouble at AF matches (or indeed any sport, if the whole world is considered), hell these days there's more trouble in Scotland than in England (and on pitch rather than off). Before you debate this point, note that the football season over here is a lot longer, starting in August and ending in May (rather than September-January), and depending on where you are (Spain/Italy) a trouble free season is a bloody miracle. Also, the fixture list is much longer (up to sixty matches a season), as most top-tier teams will compete in at least four competitions (league, league cup, national association cup, continental championship), whereas in AF, there's just the one major trophy to play for, hence the pressure from the fans to achieve something diminishes as the season goes on. Moreover, in all (except the MLS, perhaps unsurprisingly) professional leagues, there is a system of promotion/relegation which can make particularly vehement fans easy to rile towards the end of the season. With the NFL, this isn't the case, you guys can just go 'what players do you think we'll get for next season, y'know, when we try again'. When a Premier League team gets kicked out, they have to start that 46 (perhaps 49) game struggle to get back. And if football fans had 'den parties' at every match, yeesh, we'd be morbidly obese rather than the overweight that we already are.
Don't quote me, but comparatively, the least violent fanbase is rugby's (though I know the NRL has a bit of trouble each season)... I think.
Besides, if you want to disparage a sport for its violent fans: Aussie rules football *prepares flame shield* /jk
Slightly off-topic, I find it amusing that the first recorded incident of sporting hooliganism was in an England tour of Australia... in CRICKET!! Cricket... the British epitome of civilised sportsmanship *hrk*