In fairness, Shrek is one of those franchises like Dead Space or Dragon Ball where the first one was just kinda "meh" but the second was fantastic. Granted all three of those were sequelised and spun off into the ground, but it was fun while it lasted.Ultratwinkie said:OT: Oh no are we gonna get another shrek? The ending to the 1st one was definitive. You don't need anything else. Franchises get stale.
Seconded! Wreck-it Ralph set up such a large universe that they could even just make an entirely new movie with all new characters. Please, make it happen, Disney!dragongit said:I'd rather see a sequel to Wreck it Ralph. That movie has sequel potential if they had stuck to their original idea of hopping from game to game throughout the movie, instead of just a few.
an annoyed writer said:As for my thoughts on a sequel, I'm kinda with everyone else here in wondering where it could all go from there. I mean, I don't think there is nowhere it could go, but I think that where it should go will be a very hard question to answer,
Personally, I think it would be really interesting to tell a story about Elsa as a ruler: learning to be a good queen and having to make tough choices and sacrifices, maybe explore how it changes her relationship with Anna. That would make for an interesting premise.Not G. Ivingname said:Where can a Frozen 2 really go? It was a nice, self contained story, that didn't leave any threads for a sequel to really pick up on.
Sure, declare war on the woman who can snap-freeze a continent when she's having a panic attack because there is no way that giving her a legitimate target and a reason to hurt you could possibly backfire.....Armadox said:We're not likely to get a Wreck It Ralph sequel, as it takes MANY companies sayng yes for that to happen, and after the success of the last one, the money they'd want for the use of their characters has probably sky rocketed. As for Frozen? I don't mind a sequel, as long as they go to war, as other kingdoms learn of the queen witch on her frozen throne..
Just about anything really. If it's still going to be a Disney Princess style movie, it's probably going to be similar to a lot of fables and myths, a very simple story, but well told.Vault101 said:go back around 10 years I'd be concerned
however since they've mostly put a stop the Direct-to-video bullshit AND we live in an era where big sequels to big movies are profitable it *could* be decent
but what fascinates me about this is we've never had a proper sequel to a Disney Princess movie...I mean honest to god "were actually trying" sequel, what happens after the happy ending? you know?