I think you sometimes have to accept some people have achieved their potential and you're all, like, is this it?!No, he's not. That's why its infuriating to read.
I think you sometimes have to accept some people have achieved their potential and you're all, like, is this it?!No, he's not. That's why its infuriating to read.
Yes, he said he had his time planned out "to the second", and yet didn't cite a single specific plan. Funny that!He also said implied he had his time planned out.
Yes, I'm absolutely certain this happened for real, in real life.Some people can't do that all the time and do have to schedule that stuff.
To give an actual example I got to hilariously hear both sides of.
I was waiting for a bus and at the bus stop a 20 something year old girl was on about how awful her kids father was how he was refusing to have his son for the weekend and how he was being so mean stopping her going out.
I got onto the bus and there was a 20 something dude on there with his friend going. "I can't believe her, she called up yesterday and asked if I could have my son for the weekend as she wanted to go out with friends, I love the little guy and have happily had him every weekend for years, I told her this weekend I was catching up with you and everyone else and I had tickets to the match , I told her this months ago and I've got the tickets for the match she knew this one weekend she'd have to look after him and she's now taking it out on me because less than a week ago she decided this weekend she wanted to go out with her friends when she could have gone out with them any other weekend.".
You also don't generally fly off the handle if someone wants to borrow the car for a short while.Generally you try to plan schedules to work round one another. You don't just get upset you don't immediately get your own way all the time.
The detailed account by his colleagues has already been provided before.OK then what were the complaints against him that were so very serious from his colleagues again?
She was kinda visibly upset by his intensely hostile attitude and derogatory language, which you seem entirely incapable of recognising. Which is what makes me concerned for the women you know in your life.Except he was fine with her going and suggested she take an Uber not the car which seemingly caused her to become more upset because um....... I don't know she has a chronic phobia of Ubers?
Uh-huh, you used those words... after rewriting the scenario to be a completely unrecognisable one in which the woman is evil and manipulative and the man is off the hook. Empty words don't mean shit when they're clearly at odds with the rest of your approach.Both parts,
HIS
AND
HERS.
So yes I did fucking say it.
Why is she expected to do it and not him? He's not the one carrying twins, for Christ's sake.Conjecture we have no substantive evidence for either way. Also unless it's good at permeating things gloves would likely be sufficient to handle the stuff.
So you don't have a point to make and are just grinding an axe against someone who disagreed with you about a video game.No, But I'm not the one who employed the logic that it was good in Fallout Shelter you can have pregnant women work the nuclear power plant. The person I cited as some-one presenting what should be the modern standard of equality was lol.
Do you really not consider that as a victim of verbal and emotional abuse, that is the only way she can defend herself?Not controlling as such but trying to influence as that's where she jumped to.
There is only one person in that video acting like a child over not getting their own way and it isn't the woman carrying children.The at she jumped to that when not getting her own way.
Frankly, every word you've written only proves to me that you don't know a victim of abuse when you see one and are more likely to make excuses for the abuser.Yes, there are no perfect victims. As Depp's trial showed and his imperfect moments were used against him quite publicly by Heard and her team.
Where does he say that? He's more upset over not going to the gym (which isn't the same thing as school or work).Because he was going to do it, along with the other things.
Isn't this a catch-22? Either you admit a relationship is abusive or you deny it , which demonstrates that it is?Emotional abuse
Does your partner or someone you live with ever:
- deny that abuse is happening, or downplay it?
That's why there's more bullet pointsIsn't this a catch-22? Either you admit a relationship is abusive or you deny it , which demonstrates that it is?
In that context, abuse would more mean definable instances of abuse, e.g. specific insults or blows.Isn't this a catch-22? Either you admit a relationship is abusive or you deny it , which demonstrates that it is?
I mean, there was a bullet point on faulting someoneNo, he's not. That's why its infuriating to read.
Bonus points for accusing other forumites of "gaslighting" for reminding him that he said things he said.(Yes, I know DH is likely not joking but there will be a LOL later pretending they said none of this so they can blame us for being mean. That's how this always works.)
And then claiming he outwitted everyone with his superior arguments.Bonus points for accusing other forumites of "gaslighting" for reminding him that he said things he said.
Nope, same procedure, I really don't get how you don't understand this unless you're just a troll.So "the fucking point" involves using a different procedure, then.
I realise that you start off wrong for almost everything.
The procedure involved asking people to self-evaluate.Nope, same procedure, I really don't get how you don't understand this unless you're just a troll.
And here I thought he was hired to be Ken because he's a devilishly handsome son of a *****.Simu Liu calls out HuffPost for suggesting 'tokenism' landed him 'Ken' role in 'Barbie'
"Everything I have taken post Shang-Chi was not written Asian. We've been able to reshape stories to get more representation onscreen. Get your facts straight"nextshark.com
For something to be a HUMAN bias, it has to be a HUMAN bias...So "the fucking point" involves using a different procedure, then.
I realise that you start off wrong for almost everything.
It does indeed. Something which cannot be tested for in random numbers. Because you cannot ask those random numbers to self-evaluate.For something to be a HUMAN bias, it has to be a HUMAN bias...
Ok, message received, just trolling then.It does indeed. Something which cannot be tested for in random numbers. Because you cannot ask those random numbers to self-evaluate.
No. The procedure involved in the original study undeniably involves self-evaluation. That's core to the entire study. That is literally impossible to do with subjects that are incapable of self evaluation, such as numbers.Ok, message received, just trolling then.