Yes, that's a screen grab containing your claim that people are eating enough sugar to give them 100% chance of diabetes. A claim you've been unable to provide a single source or detail for-- how much sugar, how many people, a single study.
>85% of people with prediabetes, for whom it doesn't develop to diabetes.
OK, serious question here: do you genuinely believe that if presented with identical stimuli, all human bodies will always respond identically?
Australia will get hit hard by climate change, Canada has a massive housing shortage and will face snap freezes and hectic weather from climate change, NZ is for the rich, and the UK is facing poor leadership and is not in the EU.
They're warrior bugs capable of biting off human limbs and are killers with less intelligence than things you've probably eaten had
Look, you can't just keep reframing the same statement in different ways and pretend you're answering anything.
Firstly, different people will have different susceptibility to insulin resistance. Secondly, insulin resistance is not diabetes.
Can I give you some advice? Don't do this. There is no way that paper is not a shitshow in terms of any useful point you want to make here. It is not going to end well for you if you press this point.
It's clearly not "meaningless". You are talking out of your arse.
No, I said mechanisms, so I'd send you a paper linking saturated fatty acids to activation of Toll-like receptors and increased levels of pro-inflammatory markers / mediators such as (if I remember rightly) C-reactive protein and NFkB (that "k" should really be a kappa, btw.)
Firstly, vitamins are a key part of diet. Secondly, you just said doing the opposite of the government recommendations as healthy eating, you didn't specify an area.
And where are these people that are immune to insulin resistance?
It varies from person to person.
Insulin resistance =/= diabetes. This question is an attempt to shift the goalposts.
So your assumption is that the entirety of those >85% of prediabetes sufferers who don't develop diabetes have all significantly changed their diet? Do you have any evidence? What a silly question.
And yet you think there's a point at which the risk reaches 100% regardless. What is that point-- *how much sugar*?
Nope, goalpost not shifted
So answer the question. How much sugar consumption guarantees diabetes?
Okay, let's stop here. You know how I know that you know very little about science? It's because you write shit like that. What does it even mean to have better "quality" cholesterol? Utter, utter gibberish. Do you mean HDL / LDL ? Do you even understand what HDL and LDL are? I mean, it's really hard to believe that you do if you can't even use a bit of proper terminology. And even though you write this embarrassing wellness level claptrap you big yourself up and act like you've got the faintest idea about scientific papers.
That's (quite obviously) not the same thing. You originally just said that 'people' were eating so much sugar as to give themselves a 100% chance of diabetes. You then later introduced the additional condition about prediabetes.
Yes. As I've said. 85%+ of people with prediabetes do not develop diabetes.
Your light mode screenshots hurt my soul every time.
The amount that leads to pre-diabetes...
What are you talking about? You eat too much sugar and continue, you get insulin resistance, then you get pre-diabetes, then you get diabetes. That's how it works. You can change your diet to not continue on the path.
I don't understand why people use dark mode when you go and open something like Control Panel and it's then bright white, there's so much in Windows that isn't available in dark mode and it's rather inconsistent.
No, try again. Prediabetes is not diabetes. How much sugar causes a 100% chance of diabetes?
I'll stop talking down to you when you deserve it. And that means either when you really know what you are talking about, or when you stop acting like you know what you're talking about when you plainly don't.
But you evidently don't know what he meant by that. Which means you don't understand the subject. So you absolutely should not be telling everyone you know the state of research and how good any studies are on the subject when you are implicitly telling us you don't know anything about them.
Why would a "regular doctor" freak out about that? Both sides indicate cholesterol within safe guidelines.
Fuck that. Seriously. You are disgustingly disrespectful to make that sort of demand of others when you refuse to back up your own claims despite requests. I'm not wasting a minute of my time for someone so lacking in courtesy. And besides, the fact you can't find them yourself pretty much proves the point you've got no idea what you're talking about anyway because none of the YouTubers you follow have covered it.
How much for a 100% chance? Where's a single grain of evidence? Most people with prediabetes *don't develop diabetes*.
Then eat enough sugar to get prediabetes and continue with the same diet and see if you get diabetes.
www.healthline.com
Again, are there people immune to insulin resistance?
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Shifted goalpost. Insulin resistance =/= simply not getting diabetes.
Hmm, eventually-- the annual conversion rate there is 5-10%.Also, that's not true.
According to an ADA expert panel, up to 70% of individuals with prediabetes will eventually develop diabetes.
Prediabetes: A high-risk state for developing diabetes - PMC
Prediabetes (or “intermediate hyperglycaemia”), based on glycaemic parameters above normal but below diabetes thresholds is a high risk state for diabetes with an annualized conversion rate of 5%–10%; with similar proportion converting back to ...
If you eat enough sugar to get insulin resistance, and don't change your diet, you will eventually get diabetes.
Well in that case you can provide the proof of how much sugar someone needs to eat for a 100% chance of diabetes. (Or, admit you don't actually know and there's no evidence of what it might be and retract your claim.)
I'm not going to deal with separate, new claims until you substantiate your original one. How much sugar gives a 100% risk? Can I get a source?
You can wait forever. Never claimed that, it's a different claim altogether.
It's basic knowledge and common sense that if you eat so much sugar to get insulin resistance or prediabetes, you will get diabetes if you don't change your diet. You think what I'm saying is silly. But what is actually sillier, me saying what I said or your doctor diagnosing you with prediabetes and you saying you'll continue eating the same amount of sugar you're currently eating because most people with prediabetes don't get diabetes (Silvanus' argument)? You think you're doctor would actually agree with that conclusion?
A ton since I'm IT. I also prefer normal mode anyway though, I totally don't understand why people prefer dark mode.
I never claimed to know how much sugar?
