Never said any of that.Well the one thing I can at least be sure you're consistent about, you don't care about being tossed into CECOT. There's nothing illegal in doing it in your mind, so it's okay.
Visas can be revoked by the State department if they want, they don't need judicial review. You said these people are protected legal residents over a month ago, that isn't true.Immigration status can be revoked with grounds, with judicial review-- as can a citizen's freedom, as can your own freedom. It cannot be legally revoked with zero grounds and zero process, the recipients just thrown into prison overnight. That's what the law is.
You keep insisting I "simply admit" something that's utter hogwash. Even the Trump administration hasn't argued what you're insisting! Nothing you've provided has substantiated it! It's directly contradicted by the laws and court rulings already posted! It's bollocks, man.
You were arguing that habeas didn't apply, even after the Supreme Court twice stated that it definitely did. You then stopped arguing that, and just started assuming that habeas petitions would fail if they were pursued. Not once have you acknowledged that original position fell through.
Multiple federal courts have said its unlawful to deny people these rights. They're guaranteed by the Constitution to all persons. There's the illegality.
Lest we forget, you said in Trump's defence, the immortal line: "a crime must be proven". You said that to defend against some online criticism. Yet when someone is incarcerated in a torture-prison (at Trump's request, no less), suddenly it's "why does it matter if they committed a crime?"
You have no principled bone in your body.
I literally did several times...
Them committing a crime or not literally doesn't matter.
There's immigration laws that bypass due process."No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
It's the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Plain, complete, unaltered text.
We are not in a time of war or public danger. Regardless what that bloviating orange piece of shit says. Congress decides that, especially within US borders, not the president. So that's one way in which this case runs afoul of the Fifth Amendment.
Garcia's residential status had already been settled by the court once. That's two ways in which this case runs afoul of the Fifth Amendment.
Due process applies. It's "no PERSON", not "no citizen". In other words, everyone under United States jurisdiction is entitled to due process. Period. That's the third, final, and most important way in which this case runs afoul of the Fifth Amendment.
Yes, the US is going to start deporting US citizens... What conspiracy subreddit do you read?If there is no Habeus Corpus, all US citizens can be deported as illegal immigrants. The whole purpose of Due Process is allowing you to show documents to prove you are a US citizen. Without it, you can't prove anything
Thus has been the plan the whole time
No, the law they are wanting to use doesn't require them to be criminals. Why would Trump be wanting to make it harder to deport people? Also, why would US law require someone to be a convicted criminal to deport them, it would be basically impossible to deport people then.It actually does, quite a bit.
I'm going to just go ahead and quote another one of my posts from this thread because we've already gone over why you're wrong about this before:
The reason that the Trump administration keeps arguing that the people they're deporting are "criminals" is because that's the legal basis under which they can deport them, so yes, the fact that many of them entered the US legally and did not commit any crimes is indeed important.