Unfortunately, more and more so these things seem to be simply industry wankfests for the AAA cut-n-paste garbage released annually. Such is the price we pay for video games being (rightly IMO) accepted as a mainstream past time.josemlopes said:Gamespot has this bracket thing where people can vote on the games that where chosen by the staff there, of about 30 games (including FIFA 13, SSX, Nintendo Land, etc) there is still no sight of Spec Ops The Line
Oh, I agree with the original CoD games were good. They were so good that it became sort of a tradition to release one each year. But few people remember that. And for CoD to win Game of the Decade at this point wouldn't be because it was good and innovative (which it was) but because everyone and their mom play it now. That's also a good sign but...it seems to me those are the wrong reasons.josemlopes said:And lets not forget that COD4 also breaked some cliches (although they ended up creating their own cliche) and was very innovative in some regards. The death of the main character after the helicopter crash was really well done, and it worked better because everyone was expecting the same usual stuff (the main character being the only survivor of the crash). Now every COD seems to try to surpass the previous one so it becomes incredebly predictable (you already know that the "player" character will die at least 3 times) and there will be a sniper mission and a scene where civilians die, etc.srm79 said:I hate to say it, but the original CoD (PC version, not the PS2 spin-off) actually was pretty ground breaking in its day. Prior to that, only MoH had gone near WW2 and even attempted to stay grounded in reality. Wolfenstein did it, but went all Nazi-zombie pretty early on. What CoD did for the first time though, was to truly make you feel like a small cog in a large machine, participating in some of the most famous actions in history. MoH still insisted on giving you one obligitary epic D-Day scaled level before leaving you to your own 1-man-army devices for the rest of the game. They tried to address this in expansions, I know, but it never worked the way it did in CoD.Beautiful End said:I'm just glad a game like CoD wasn't nominated to begin with.
I still have my copies of CoD and CoD 2, both of which get played regularly to this day. As single player experiences they took the FPS rule book and while not exactly throwing it away, at least gave it a comprehensive updating and kicked off the entire modern "military shooter" genre (not to be confused with the "modern military shooter" genre which only emerged as a result of running out of the battles everyone has heard of to set WWII games in.
Maybe not game of the decade material, but I always think people tend to forget how good the franchise used to be.
Basicly I wouldnt mind to have seen COD 1 or COD 4 nominated in there (COD 2 while being good and dont think that it pushed anything forward in terms of creative innovation.
OT: Its very hard to think of a single game that could top all the others, that being said I would consider Spec Ops The Line to be a very important game in this decade, unfortenly its nowhere to be seen in any game of the year award nomination. Shit, Gamespot has this bracket thing where people can vote on the games that where chosen by the staff there, of about 30 games (including FIFA 13, SSX, Nintendo Land, etc) there is still no sight of Spec Ops The Line
I--ShinyCharizard said:You know what. I'm gonna say that Katawa Shoujo is my game of the decade. It is just an amazing emotional and beautiful game, almost life-changing really (particularly true for Rin's path). To anyone that hasn't tried it it's free so please just give it a go.
As for Half-Life 2. It's a great game but not nearly worthy of being called game of the decade.
You can never be saddened about having to replay Katawa ShoujoBeautiful End said:I--ShinyCharizard said:You know what. I'm gonna say that Katawa Shoujo is my game of the decade. It is just an amazing emotional and beautiful game, almost life-changing really (particularly true for Rin's path). To anyone that hasn't tried it it's free so please just give it a go.
As for Half-Life 2. It's a great game but not nearly worthy of being called game of the decade.
Huh. I...actually agree. I didn't even consider Katawa Shoujo.
My game got deleted by mistake a couple of months back and I have to replay it now. I'm not even saddened!
And yeah, HL2 was good but...that's about it.
I sincerely appreciate your warning and I am typically all about forum guidelines, however if I broke one above, I happily face the wrath for I posted in a one-word manner with intention and purpose.TizzytheTormentor said:Just to let you know, you should probably try to type more than that or you might get a low content warning, just a heads up!The_Scrivener said:Portal.
OT: There can never really be a "game of the decade" because of everyone's different tastes, for example, I never found Half-Life 2 very fun to play. It should be split into genres, but knowing Spike, they will only choose games that are best-selling and insanely popular, instead of niche games that are possibly way better.
That's because it's absolutely not. Games have done everything HL2 has done and done it far better.MajorTomServo said:I think HL2 is the most overrated game of the decade. I don't think it's half as good as most people say...