Ok Ive yet to see a thread like this and its simple I want to know what games have had better sequels then the first game and games sequels that just fell short. I'll start in case your confused.
Battlefield bad company 2 was a sad sequel to the first. Bad co. didn't need the blood and cursing because it was perfect without it plus the best multiplayer ive ever played and a solid funny lively single player and some of the best music ive ever heard from a game.
assassins creed was a good game...but very bland but then once assassins creed 2 came out it was sooo much better than the first. sidequests,interactive cutscenes,no flag collecting,dual hidden blades the list goes on and on.
ok I think you guys get the idea so I want to see your views on sequels good and bad.
Battlefield bad company 2 was a sad sequel to the first. Bad co. didn't need the blood and cursing because it was perfect without it plus the best multiplayer ive ever played and a solid funny lively single player and some of the best music ive ever heard from a game.
assassins creed was a good game...but very bland but then once assassins creed 2 came out it was sooo much better than the first. sidequests,interactive cutscenes,no flag collecting,dual hidden blades the list goes on and on.
ok I think you guys get the idea so I want to see your views on sequels good and bad.