I'll throw in a name.
Burnout 3: Takedown.
As a (FUN) racing game i feel it is nearly impossible to find flaws.
Burnout 3: Takedown.
As a (FUN) racing game i feel it is nearly impossible to find flaws.
OOOOOMIIIIGOOOOSH YES.Miles000 said:Edit: Going back a bit here. But Crash Team Racing goes on that list too.
That game was perfect.
Pray tell, what falls under your definition of a "full fledged RPG?" Here's to hoping that your not person who defines an RPG as being an inventory clerk in all but name.Pulchellus said:Mass Effect? A critic proof classic? It was an on rails shooter pretending to be a full fledged RPG, the much touted choices in role play boiled down to "pick the blue or red option", none of the decisions the player makes have any real significant impact on the game world at all. Don't get me wrong, it was a very fun on rails shooter with good writing, great characters and nice visuals, but an epic?
I don't want to start a debate here, if that is your opinion then that is your opinion but if you want to have an objective discussion, could you try to put into words why you think it transcends just being very good?
It was the game that got me truly into gaming.Singularly Datarific said:OOOOOMIIIIGOOOOSH YES.Miles000 said:Edit: Going back a bit here. But Crash Team Racing goes on that list too.
That game was perfect.
That game was the multiplayer portion of my childhood. Many a game was played between my brothers and cousins. Fantastic. Excellent. Loved it.
Well, it wouldn't be unbiased to say that some of them are undeniably good, the original Mario, Mario 64, OoT are all hands down great games. Now to say that TP or Sunshine are undeniably good could be pretty biased, I love the games but they both have enough flaws to make some people not like it.Matt Kinol said:I would like to put Mass Effect and some Mario and Zelda games up there, but I feel like that would be biased. I may be blinded by fanboyism or nostalgia. What do you think?
Ignoring the snowmobile jumps and the boat sequence near the end that looked like it was a from a James Bond movieIstvan said:Modern Warfare 2 was a gleaming jewel in my opinion. Great story, great characters, realistic weapons, and its just like it'd play out in real life. Really cool game, and the online part speaks for itself.
You can never please everyone, so there's always a critic.Matt Kinol said:I feel that in many mediums there are certain examples that simply cannot be touched by critics.
A lot of people, myself included, feel that Mass Effect is just the slightest bit to "shoot first, roleplay later." Is it amazing? Obviously, but I don't see why it should be touted as a paragon (see what I did there?) of RPG's that heralds the modern iteration of the genre. Still, it has the best damn plot since god knows what. . . unless you include ME2.w@rew0lf said:Pray tell, what falls under your definition of a "full fledged RPG?" Here's to hoping that your not person who defines an RPG as being an inventory clerk in all but name.Pulchellus said:Mass Effect? A critic proof classic? It was an on rails shooter pretending to be a full fledged RPG, the much touted choices in role play boiled down to "pick the blue or red option", none of the decisions the player makes have any real significant impact on the game world at all. Don't get me wrong, it was a very fun on rails shooter with good writing, great characters and nice visuals, but an epic?
I don't want to start a debate here, if that is your opinion then that is your opinion but if you want to have an objective discussion, could you try to put into words why you think it transcends just being very good?
On another note, seeing as this thread is a practice in opinion, I answer with Kingdom Hearts II.
How can you say that the "focus is on a shine to perfection" when you've never even seen the movie? Citizen Kane is so overused as an example of brilliance that, ironically, many dismiss it outright. But it really is a brilliant film that gets better with repeated viewings, and it definitely wasn't made with "Let's make a perfect movie" in mind. The movie is not about a sled; Orson Welles didn't even want Rosebud in the film.believer258 said:While we're at it, can we stop using that term? If I never watch Citizen Kane in my life, I will be happy. It was his fucking sled and that's all I needed to know for memetic purposes. I don't hate the movie, and it can be as perfect as it wants to, but I'd rather watch something flawed and interesting than something perfect and boring. In fact, I find that when the focus is on a shine to perfection, the final product ends up being boring almost all of the time.
Please show me the game that took and improved Portal's concept; because I've never seen anything at all like it.majora13 said:I disagree with Half Life and Portal. They're good; Half Life is a good action blockbuster, Portal is good clever puzzle gimmick. But going back to them now... It's not the same. Those formulas have been taken and improved.