halo, it be ok if they brought the ohter player in as a major npc but he is just there for no reason.
Cant recall when I viewed FF as a game :/Sapient Pearwood said:I think you're in the wrong forum, we like games hereangelous_lecter said:I am gonna go with Pinball here... since most games are generally shit and should not even have the grace of a release date :/
Uh I'd have to say FEAR. Pvp seperate from the main story yes but don't bring co-op into the main plot.
100% on the money. BS2 felt like a play for money rather than a lovingly crafted sequel. What a shame, since the first was a masterpiece.Crash 9000 said:Bioshock 2, I guess they realised that they weren't going to make the second as good as the first, so they just slapped on multiplayer and released it. Which is why I didn't get it
Just like I won't be getting AC: Brotherhood.
you my friend, have not been introduced to Final Fantasy Tactics. Don't ask me how, just know that it works, in a way only FF(well, the older ones anyway) could do.Glamorgan said:Anything turn based. Just wouldn't make sense.
It was developed by another division of 2k but your right, it could of been money spent towards the campaign and hiring better writers.AlternatePFG said:BioShock 2 should've never had the multiplayer. It was tacked on, and because of it the campaign was shorter and not nearly as good as the originals.
Except for Worms.Glamorgan said:Anything turn based. Just wouldn't make sense.
This.AlternatePFG said:BioShock 2 should've never had the multiplayer. It was tacked on, and because of it the campaign was shorter and not nearly as good as the originals.
The multiplayer is being made by a different team; just don't play it.Dr. Awesome Face said:I am going to start with Assassin's Creed. Although everything I have seen from Brotherhood looks good and might be fun, I just don't feel like the gameplay or concept really lends itself to being multiplayer. I am still going to pick it up but I hope they don't include multiplayer in AC3.
This. BioShock had absolutely no reason to include multiplayer. Or to make a sequel at all for that matter, but that's a different issue.Crash 9000 said:Bioshock 2, I guess they realised that they weren't going to make the second as good as the first, so they just slapped on multiplayer and released it. Which is why I didn't get it
Just like I won't be getting AC: Brotherhood.
Yeah i think V13 got derailed right out of the gate.WanderingFool said:I agree with Mass Effect 3, and also put forward Fallout. I heard awhile back there was plans for a Fallout MMO, just doesnt seem right...
I dissagree. I thought that the multiplayer was good on its own but then i finished it andAlternatePFG said:BioShock 2 should've never had the multiplayer. It was tacked on, and because of it the campaign was shorter and not nearly as good as the originals.
Ever played the Civilisation series? Heroes of Might and Magic series? Worms series? Masters of Orion series? Plenty of games work well in turn based multiplayer. Not to mention Chess.Glamorgan said:Anything turn based. Just wouldn't make sense.