Some games are fine just as they are, and should best be left untouched to shine and glisten in the halls of video game history. What game do you think shouldn't have a sequel, or didn't need a sequel?
Not to knitpick, but "Gears of War" is "GeOW," simply because "God of War" was out first, and had the abbreviation of "GoW" first. Sorry if I sounded rude.Isaac Dodgson said:GoW: Yeah I know it's sequel is already on the horizon, but I wasn't that much of a fan of the game to begin with, and I feel a sequel is only going to fill all the holes to a story I don't even care about.
Really? I found the second one to be pretty good. You aren't talking about KH: Chain of Memories, right? Just KH2? Ah well, I heard quite a few people found the second game to suck. I myself thought it was fun, but nothing compared to the first.Phowks said:Kingdom Hearts. I absolutely loved playing the first one, it was a great game. The second one was a total travesty, completely painful to play through. I think it only such a rave because of the fandom of KH1.
Good news! They already announced a third game.Eagle Est1986 said:Bioshock. Really, really doesn't need a sequel, I really hope they don't make one as I can't see it being as good as the first.
A third? I knew a second was in the works but I was trying to pretend it wasn't happening.... not a tactic that has ever worked so far in my life.Saphatorael said:Good news! They already announced a third game.Eagle Est1986 said:Bioshock. Really, really doesn't need a sequel, I really hope they don't make one as I can't see it being as good as the first.