Mojo said:
Well, they lost my sale when they decided to charge 15? for the 4-map DLCs and then decided to release the "premium" service for 50? but decided to also bundle it with the core game for 50?, essentially giving it free to anyone who didn't buy the game in the first three months, yet still expect me to buy the premium thing for 50? even though Id already spend 50? on the game and 30? on the first two DLCs.
Heck, BC2 got about 5 or 6 new maps in free updates and had the Vietnam expansion which also cost 15? for a way more content then the BF3 DlCs.
Yeah, that's annoying as fuck, turned me off Battlefield greatly. I gave CQ a miss (because I don't play BF for close quarter no-vehicle maps), then when I came back for Armored Kill (that I was quite excited about), I just couldn't get into it as much as I would, thanks to the good servers mostly being Premium ones that I was denied access to.
And very much agreed on your point of "hey, let's reward the players who DIDN'T have our game 3 months into it". I pre-ordered the game and wasn't interested in CQ (also had no idea about what Aftermath and End Game would be), so paying more money for what I could get with buying single DLCs one at a time didn't seem like an idea that made much sense. I also remember them saying the only bonuses outside the DLCs would be visual, but here we are, a while into Premium, and there are Premium-only servers. They mentioned the faster queuing and while I was against that too, I said fuck it, I'll wait a minute or two more per game. But actually denying me access to a game I bought because I'm not a Premium subscriber? You know what, fuck you EA and fuck you DICE, even if this idea was pushed on you, you're a bunch of pansies for not being able to stand up for your own game.
Sadly, BF being my preferred game, I'll likely still buy BF4 simply because I need an online FPS to play and nothing else is really my thing. I will however, as I have so far with refusing to buy the new DLCs, be much more careful and restrained about it.