GameStop Chops PlayStation 3's Price

Epona

Elite Member
Jun 24, 2011
4,221
0
41
Country
United States
Zachary Amaranth said:
Crono1973 said:
20% is not a giant, lip licking discount. Comparing this price to the launch price isn't really fair play either. It's probably worth $199 for the Blu-Ray player and Netflix software alone. It has the best Netflix software of any device especially since Microsoft broke their video playback with that new UI. I read it was fixed but it still looks much worse than the PS3 on the same HDTV.
While I agree it has the best Netflix playback of the consoles, I'm not sure a 200 dollar asking price is so hot compared to BD players for a quarter of the price that are Netflix ready. Can't speak to their interfaces, but a dedicated BD player with Netflix is pretty cheap now.
I can tell you that my Panasonic BD 85 Blu-Ray player has the worst Netflix interface and can't be easily updated because there is no HDD. No subtitles for example because that was added to Netflix after this player was made.
 

GaltarDude1138

New member
Jan 19, 2011
307
0
0
While the $200 price point is attractive, I'm sticking with the one I have.

Because MINE'S SO OLD, IT PLAYS MY PS2 GAMES.
...
I mean, that's not something you hear someone brag about every day XD
 

Tanakh

New member
Jul 8, 2011
1,512
0
0
Lonny said:
Why is console gaming so expensive? When I wanted to upgrade my aging 4 year old PC that was only used for email and youtube, it only took a $100 video card and a $30 memory stick for me to play current PC games on high settings.
What kind of games are you playing? Just off the top of my head Witcher 2 or BF 3 would require a $450 or so card to run on their high settings.

That said, the current PC $400+ cards are almost exactly what consoles will get two years from now, in their next gen. And the good old Radeon HD 6950 for $240 bucks will bring you eyecandy miles ahead from current consoles.
 

Lonny

New member
Apr 20, 2012
3
0
0
Tanakh said:
Lonny said:
Why is console gaming so expensive? When I wanted to upgrade my aging 4 year old PC that was only used for email and youtube, it only took a $100 video card and a $30 memory stick for me to play current PC games on high settings.
What kind of games are you playing? Just off the top of my head Witcher 2 or BF 3 would require a $450 or so card to run on their high settings.

That said, the current PC $400+ cards are almost exactly what consoles will get two years from now, in their next gen. And the good old Radeon HD 6950 for $240 bucks will bring you eyecandy miles ahead from current consoles.
What? No you crazy. No PC games need more than a ~$150 video card unless you are running 16x AA 16x AF, which is just making your PC into a space heater rather than actually improving the image.

http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

Radeon 6790 is smoking Skyrim at the moment with added super-high res modder texture packs and shaders. The GeForce GTX 480 is nearly the fastest GPU available and only costs $229.
 

SEXTON HALE

New member
Apr 12, 2012
231
0
0
Excellent just what ive been waiting for!
Im going to get as many of these as I can and network them into a super computer.
It will be no ordinary super computer NO he will be my son!
I will bring him to life give him intelligence a life and a name raise him as my own and send him out to face the world.
It will be tough but you have to let go sooner or later;(
 

AgentCooper

New member
Dec 16, 2010
184
0
0
It seems Amazon has priced matched GameStops price on the PS3.My brothers birthday is coming up soon and this will be a excellent surprise.
 

Tanakh

New member
Jul 8, 2011
1,512
0
0
Lonny said:
What? No you crazy. No PC games need more than a ~$150 video card unless you are running 16x AA 16x AF, which is just making your PC into a space heater rather than actually improving the image.

http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

Radeon 6790 is smoking Skyrim at the moment with added super-high res modder texture packs and shaders. The GeForce GTX 480 is nearly the fastest GPU available and only costs $229.
Suit yourself, but a Radeon 6790 won't even get 10 FPS on BF 3 on their ultra settings, it will probably get a sub 50 FPS framerate even on medium-high ones, you also won't be able to play SC II on ultra witout lag (not that any sane person runs on ultra nway) or witcher 2 with Ubersampling.


And of course you can run skyrim with high res textures, it is a videogame designed to run in 8 years old hardware like the Xbox 360, adding higher res textures is only demanding some more vram.

Lastly, I think you are very missguided on your sources, a GTX 480 should score on a synthetic benchmark like 3DMark11 around 4k, current top of the line GPUs score 9k-10k. G3D Mark? I don't think have ever heard about that synthetic, and after seeing their charts it's no wonder, they don't seem to predict the cards performance under real games at all; and their card selection seems kinda random, Quadro? Lolz, why the heck are they even including Workstation GPUs there?
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Crono1973 said:
I can tell you that my Panasonic BD 85 Blu-Ray player has the worst Netflix interface and can't be easily updated because there is no HDD. No subtitles for example because that was added to Netflix after this player was made.
That certainly bites. I'm impressed with the XBox 360 one managing to be even worse than the one before. This is one of the reasons I do love my PS3, so your point is not completely lost on me.

No not even flash media internally? The one I got my mom can update, but it doesn't have a disk drive, just flash memory. I figured that would be standard. She doesn't have Netflix, so I don't know if hers can be updated.
 

Lonny

New member
Apr 20, 2012
3
0
0
Tanakh said:
Lonny said:
What? No you crazy. No PC games need more than a ~$150 video card unless you are running 16x AA 16x AF, which is just making your PC into a space heater rather than actually improving the image.

http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

Radeon 6790 is smoking Skyrim at the moment with added super-high res modder texture packs and shaders. The GeForce GTX 480 is nearly the fastest GPU available and only costs $229.
Suit yourself, but a Radeon 6790 won't even get 10 FPS on BF 3 on their ultra settings, it will probably get a sub 50 FPS framerate even on medium-high ones, you also won't be able to play SC II on ultra witout lag (not that any sane person runs on ultra nway) or witcher 2 with Ubersampling.


And of course you can run skyrim with high res textures, it is a videogame designed to run in 8 years old hardware like the Xbox 360, adding higher res textures is only demanding some more vram.

Lastly, I think you are very missguided on your sources, a GTX 480 should score on a synthetic benchmark like 3DMark11 around 4k, current top of the line GPUs score 9k-10k. G3D Mark? I don't think have ever heard about that synthetic, and after seeing their charts it's no wonder, they don't seem to predict the cards performance under real games at all; and their card selection seems kinda random, Quadro? Lolz, why the heck are they even including Workstation GPUs there?
Man, I played SC2 on Ultra back on my Geforce 8800GT. The only problem was that levels took 2-3 mins to load because I had 2 GB of RAM at the time, so I switched down a few settings to high. In game performance was absolutely flawless.
 

Tanakh

New member
Jul 8, 2011
1,512
0
0
Lonny said:
Man, I played SC2 on Ultra back on my Geforce 8800GT. The only problem was that levels took 2-3 mins to load because I had 2 GB of RAM at the time, so I switched down a few settings to high. In game performance was absolutely flawless.
And of course we are talking about different things, you are most probably thinking of the single player campaing and i am talking about the final battle of Desert Strike (custom map) or 4v4 with motherships.
 

Epona

Elite Member
Jun 24, 2011
4,221
0
41
Country
United States
Zachary Amaranth said:
Crono1973 said:
I can tell you that my Panasonic BD 85 Blu-Ray player has the worst Netflix interface and can't be easily updated because there is no HDD. No subtitles for example because that was added to Netflix after this player was made.
That certainly bites. I'm impressed with the XBox 360 one managing to be even worse than the one before. This is one of the reasons I do love my PS3, so your point is not completely lost on me.

No not even flash media internally? The one I got my mom can update, but it doesn't have a disk drive, just flash memory. I figured that would be standard. She doesn't have Netflix, so I don't know if hers can be updated.
It can be updated and has been but there are limits because there is so little internal memory. You even have to use an SD card if you want to use BD Live (why would you though, it's just ads). I doubt Panasonic will use the SD card to store Netflix software though.

On the other hand, there really is no limit on the PS3 since it has a HDD and a pretty large one at that. Also, on the Panasonic, it has problems with it's wireless adapter and even plugged in via ethernet, it is slow and due to low memory can only store 100 titles. That means if you have Star Trek TNG on your queue, which has almost 200 episodes, only 100 of them will load in at a time. If you want to watch an episode not loaded in, you have to start the episode you want to watch on the PC (so it marks that episode as the last one watched), then reload the Netflix software on the Panasonic. You don't have those problems with the PS3, 360 or PC.

Now granted, some blu-ray players will have more internal memory but none will have as much as a PS3 with 160, 250 or 320 GB.
 

Epona

Elite Member
Jun 24, 2011
4,221
0
41
Country
United States
Well, I did it. I bought another PS3 but I got a free game (Mortal Kombat Komplete but you can also get Batman Arkham City) for $199.99 so I really got 33% off.
 

AbstractStream

New member
Feb 18, 2011
1,399
0
0
Holy hell! That's ridiculously cheap (for a console)!
If I didn't already have a PS3, I would actually go out to buy one. It might be good for another 2 years.
 

Doom-Slayer

Ooooh...I has custom title.
Jul 18, 2009
630
0
0
Jesse Billingsley said:
Wish they did the same with their bloody games.... $60 for a 3 year old game.
Try here. 110NZD or 90usd for any new console title. Probably around 80usd for an old game. Oh..and PC games? Only 10 bucks cheaper.

And people wonder why Steam is so popular all over the world.
 

Jesse Billingsley

New member
Mar 21, 2011
400
0
0
Doom-Slayer said:
Jesse Billingsley said:
Wish they did the same with their bloody games.... $60 for a 3 year old game.
Try here. 110NZD or 90usd for any new console title. Probably around 80usd for an old game. Oh..and PC games? Only 10 bucks cheaper.

And people wonder why Steam is so popular all over the world.
Don't you guys always have F*ed up game prices?
 

Doom-Slayer

Ooooh...I has custom title.
Jul 18, 2009
630
0
0
Jesse Billingsley said:
Doom-Slayer said:
Jesse Billingsley said:
Wish they did the same with their bloody games.... $60 for a 3 year old game.
Try here. 110NZD or 90usd for any new console title. Probably around 80usd for an old game. Oh..and PC games? Only 10 bucks cheaper.

And people wonder why Steam is so popular all over the world.
Don't you guys always have F*ed up game prices?
Yaaaaarp :p Just checking now, a 160gb Ps3 is 400usd here(480nzd) and Id consider that normal. They used to be 600+ nzds when they came out. I just find it amusing when people mention the $60usd price limit, since the only time I see that is on 3 year old games on special.