Lonny said:
What? No you crazy. No PC games need more than a ~$150 video card unless you are running 16x AA 16x AF, which is just making your PC into a space heater rather than actually improving the image.
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html
Radeon 6790 is smoking Skyrim at the moment with added super-high res modder texture packs and shaders. The GeForce GTX 480 is nearly the fastest GPU available and only costs $229.
Suit yourself, but a Radeon 6790 won't even get 10 FPS on BF 3 on their ultra settings, it will probably get a sub 50 FPS framerate even on medium-high ones, you also won't be able to play SC II on ultra witout lag (not that any sane person runs on ultra nway) or witcher 2 with Ubersampling.
And of course you can run skyrim with high res textures, it is a videogame designed to run in 8 years old hardware like the Xbox 360, adding higher res textures is only demanding some more vram.
Lastly, I think you are very missguided on your sources, a GTX 480 should score on a synthetic benchmark like 3DMark11 around 4k, current top of the line GPUs score 9k-10k. G3D Mark? I don't think have ever heard about that synthetic, and after seeing their charts it's no wonder, they don't seem to predict the cards performance under real games at all; and their card selection seems kinda random, Quadro? Lolz, why the heck are they even including Workstation GPUs there?