He said ethics, not moralsZeeky_Santos said:heh, your saying that about a person who swims in a pool of money instead of giving to the poor.Indigo_Dingo said:No, Scrooge McDuck had ethics.
Because then he'd be selling them at a loss...?Indigo_Dingo said:Why doesn't he just drop the price?
Yes, but he's the Retailer. He depends on selling it for profit, whereas most console manufacturers have always sold consoles at losses and made it up with games.Indigo_Dingo said:Isn't that exactly what he's asking Sony to do?orannis62 said:Because then he'd be selling them at a loss...?Indigo_Dingo said:Why doesn't he just drop the price?
Well said, loremazd.loremazd said:Well Inigo, it depends. For all you know the PS3 could be being sold at retailers for -very low profit margins. His stockholders also wouldn't allow him to make a price cut to take a loss on hardware, because they own the company, not him. Retailers always sell things on the same profit margin, it's how their stockholders want them to run. All this guy is saying is if sony wants those number, they need to drop prices, and he anticipates them doing so. And frankly, he's absolutely correct. It'd be a little rediculous for sony to release anticipated sales numbers and him to say "If Sony wants those numbers, I'm going to have to drop prices." He's not making Sony's business plan.