If Wall Street fails, that state of affairs is going to look paradisical.I do.
You seem to have missed the presser from the White House yesterday about one in seven US households being food-insecure. I mean, atop the months' of reporting on miles-long food lines, eviction and foreclosure crises, and the ten trillion in QE over the past year.
And you're suggestion is to make it worse. Whether that is out of spite or ignorance, it is a terrible attitude to take when the lives of a hundred million people are the stakes.
Only if the wrong people are still allowed own everything. We have more than enough houses for everyone. We produce more than enough food for everyone. The only reason there is deprivation on such a massive scale is because we just allow literal mass murdering fucks profit off of it.If Wall Street fails, that state of affairs is going to look paradisical.
What I think you want is to reform it so it better serves US society - perhaps you could end it in the long run through gradual phasing out. Inflicting years of chaos and deprivation on the people you aspire to raise up is not exactly ideal.
And my question is: is this spite big enough for them to bite the bullet willingly? How many put their money expecting to never getting it back? The stock market usually is motivated by greed and fear; so pure spite is pretty rare there.What makes this different... is spite.
You cannot have Wall Street (as it is now) crash without taking the US economy down with it: it would be literally years, and potentially over a decade or two before the USA fully recovered.Only if the wrong people are still allowed own everything. We have more than enough houses for everyone. We produce more than enough food for everyone. The only reason there is deprivation on such a massive scale is because we just allow literal mass murdering fucks profit off of it.
I'd imagine that anyone who steps up to do that will trigger some sort of defense mechanism as the money and power protects itself. I'd imagine that all that money could buy some sophisticated and devastating counter-measures of questionable legality.If one wants to reform capitalism (and we all should want to) the better way is to put pressure on politicians. If the choice is cushy lobbyist money from Wall Street or losing the election because voters don't turn out for whoever wants to let the current system remain as is, they'll cave to voter demands every single time.
Great now houseman is talking sense guys. Good job.I'd imagine that anyone who steps up to do that will trigger some sort of defense mechanism as the money and power protects itself. I'd imagine that all that money could buy some sophisticated and devastating counter-measures of questionable legality.
And you're suggestion is to make it worse. Whether that is out of spite or ignorance, it is a terrible attitude to take when the lives of a hundred million people are the stakes.
...and your suggestion is to kick the can down the road another ten years like what happened last time, to ensure the effects when it does inevitably come crashing down -- likely due to the unavoidable catastrophic consequences of climate change -- there really will be a full-on American Holodomor? When this scenario is as you claim it to be specifically because of your line of myopic and foolish doomsaying provided for neither meaningful reform nor consequences for those responsible?If Wall Street fails, that state of affairs is going to look paradisical.
What I think you want is to reform it so it better serves US society - perhaps you could end it in the long run through gradual phasing out. Inflicting years of chaos and deprivation on the people you aspire to raise up is not exactly ideal.
...and your suggestion is to kick the can down the road another ten years like what happened last time, to ensure the effects when it does inevitably come crashing down -- likely due to the unavoidable catastrophic consequences of climate change -- there really will be a full-on American Holodomor? When this scenario is as you claim it to be specifically because of your line of myopic and foolish doomsaying provided for neither meaningful reform nor consequences for those responsible?
Well, the problem as I see it is all their money is imaginary. We either have to play act that they do something or society collapses.... they former which devalues everyone else worth. When you realise that Wall Street is pretty much taxing the average worker 90% of their production value just so they can do some bets doesn't sit well with most people. Oh sorry, because its privately done, we cant say they aren't taxing us.
Yep, I'm not stupid enough to hope Wall Street has a massive collapse and screws everyone's lives up for no clear gain except satisfying the bloodlust of more extreme socialists. So sue me.
Significantly more aggressive sustainability policies and financial regulations etc. I'm fine with. The problem is passing them in the face of political opposition.
Yeah, you just think we'll survive letting Wall Street carry on screwing everyone's lives up.
Yep, I'm not stupid enough to hope Wall Street has a massive collapse and screws everyone's lives up for no clear gain except satisfying the bloodlust of more extreme socialists. So sue me.
Significantly more aggressive sustainability policies and financial regulations etc. I'm fine with. The problem is passing them in the face of political opposition.
Dreaming of Wall Street collapsing is the left-wing equivalent of people who think a massive, years-long war with China is the best way to solve a load of the world's problems: a load of incredible ruin with no guarantee of success, when there are still a lot of much less devastating ways available to accomplish the same ends.We either stop pretending their bullshit is real or we let the rich get richer and the poor get poorer but hopefully slower or something maybe? What I'm saying is we let Wall Street collapse and then we stop pretending billionaires aren't just using their pong high score to claim they own everything and the people who do all of the labour and all of the producing own nothing.
This operates under the assumption that Capitalism can be reformed or that reforming it is worth the effort, I would argue that it's not, there's little point in trying to fix a system that is quite literally designed upon the premise that some people must have less or nothing in other to be subservient to those that do, a system in which the general populace have no real say on what to do as the real decisions are made by the political class that pretends to be the voice of the people and the filthy capitalists that pay them, it doesn't seem worth the time to me, rather than that we should seek to replace it with something else, I mean why settle for the pretend voting we have now when we could change the system to one where our votes actually do something?If one wants to reform capitalism (and we all should want to) the better way is to put pressure on politicians. If the choice is cushy lobbyist money from Wall Street or losing the election because voters don't turn out for whoever wants to let the current system remain as is, they'll cave to voter demands every single time.
At least it's an ideal, as opposed to "doing the same thing politicians have been talking about doing since the S&L crisis until the issue passes out of public scrutiny, then continuing the status quo while pretending something was done" apologia. Someone once said something about doing the same thing over and again, but expecting different results...
Yep, I'm not stupid enough to hope Wall Street has a massive collapse and screws everyone's lives up for no clear gain except satisfying the bloodlust of more extreme socialists. So sue me.
Significantly more aggressive sustainability policies and financial regulations etc. I'm fine with. The problem is passing them in the face of political opposition.
Whether those ways are actually available is contested.when there are still a lot of much less devastating ways available to accomplish the same ends.
Hitler was also a man with ideals...At least it's an ideal, as opposed to "doing the same thing politicians have been talking about doing since the S&L crisis until the issue passes out of public scrutiny, then continuing the status quo while pretending something was done" apologia. Someone once said something about doing the same thing over and again, but expecting different results...
...but honestly, can't expect much different of people who supported Biden.
Reminds me of Republicans who say it's too soon to politicise the issue straight after a mass shooting and then just get to hold off until the next one.At least it's an ideal, as opposed to "doing the same thing politicians have been talking about doing since the S&L crisis until the issue passes out of public scrutiny, then continuing the status quo while pretending something was done" apologia. Someone once said something about doing the same thing over and again, but expecting different results...
...but honestly, can't expect much different of people who supported Biden.