Wait, lemme double check these.Silva said:I've criticised Steam, by daring to mention in a thread around here once that it didn't allow you to play games offline (which, at one time, was true) but about a hundred people jumped on me at once to point out Offline Mode and tell me that I was stupid not to know about it.
It was really hypocritical, because it is the DEFINITION of stupidity to expect others to have all the same knowledge as what you do of a system. Polite corrections, meanwhile, would have been welcome - had there been any.
I also seriously dislike the Assassin's Creed series, despite owning the first game. The glitches that made my PS3 crash constantly, the pointless flag system that failed to lengthen the already very short game, the far too easy fighting system which was solved just by pressing two buttons over and over again... and the horrible repetitiveness of every mission, and that's to say nothing of sub-missions.
And before anyone says anything, yes, I hear that the sequel has fixed almost all of those things, but that doesn't make me want to buy it. The fact that Ubisoft robbed me of my good funds with that absolutely average, overrated piece of crap that was the first game, has totally turned me off to giving them any money for any game in the future, no matter how critically acclaimed.
You beautiful man, I couldn't have said it any better.MazzaTheFirst said:I do believe his reply was sarcastic.
My sin would be I refuse to play Modern Warfare 2. Not because it is so popular, but because I believe games need strong single player before being carried by multiplayer. So I won't even give it the time of day to test it since I hear it has a five hour campaign then you grind online play forever.
This goes for all multiplayer requirement games.
So I judge games before I play them if I hear they have no single player or a extremely short one.
Just had to be there I guess.j1-2themax said:I rented Ocarina of Time for one weekend a long time ago and, while I thought it was okay, didn't think it was the greatest game ever, as so many other people seem to.
I shun any kind of online multiplayer (what can I say..I'm from "the 5th generation": PSX/ N64...or "those ancient times when story mattered").Julianking93 said:So I'd like to know, what gaming "sin" (as the above person calls it) have you committed?
Or, what are some that you know others have done?
Be it a gaming rule, a certain famous franchise you don't like or whatever, what is it?
What about Spiderman 2? I thought it was okay at least. Swinging around the city was entertaining.Zeromaeus said:Movie-based games are never good.
Of all the posts here, this is the one that got my fanboy teeth a-gnashing. Good job. Now hold still while I snipe you with a tranq pistol.The Madman said:I don't like either the Metal Gear Solid series nor any of the recent Final Fantasy games.
Yes, call me a heretic, I don't mind. I could like a dozen reasons easily off the top of my head why I find myself disliking both series, but that would be flame-baiting so I'll resist. Either way I just don't like em and sometimes wonder how anyone could, I just don't get it!
Whether or not I "should've" known something is not for you to decide, oh Holy Judge of All That Must Be Judged.StevieWonderMk2 said:Wait, lemme double check these.Silva said:I've criticised Steam, by daring to mention in a thread around here once that it didn't allow you to play games offline (which, at one time, was true) but about a hundred people jumped on me at once to point out Offline Mode and tell me that I was stupid not to know about it.
It was really hypocritical, because it is the DEFINITION of stupidity to expect others to have all the same knowledge as what you do of a system. Polite corrections, meanwhile, would have been welcome - had there been any.
I also seriously dislike the Assassin's Creed series, despite owning the first game. The glitches that made my PS3 crash constantly, the pointless flag system that failed to lengthen the already very short game, the far too easy fighting system which was solved just by pressing two buttons over and over again... and the horrible repetitiveness of every mission, and that's to say nothing of sub-missions.
And before anyone says anything, yes, I hear that the sequel has fixed almost all of those things, but that doesn't make me want to buy it. The fact that Ubisoft robbed me of my good funds with that absolutely average, overrated piece of crap that was the first game, has totally turned me off to giving them any money for any game in the future, no matter how critically acclaimed.
You criticise a system for not having a specific feature that it actually has. Then you complain when people rip into you for your inaccurate criticism? Yeah, I'll agree that they should be polite and shouldn't automatically assume you know the same things that they do, but in this situation you really SHOULD have known that.
Second: You criticise a game series on it's flawed first game. You refuse to play the second one because you believe it will still have those exact flaws, despite every gaming critic praising it for REMOVING said flaws? So you won't play the good second game because you wasted money on the first. Pro-tip: That money is still wasted, whether you buy the second game or not.