Gaming Laptops

mALX

New member
Feb 11, 2009
560
0
0
thedrop2zero said:
Most of the Alienware laptops will get it done. It will be costly though. My Alienware M17 has dual ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 CrossfireX enabled video cards, 4GB of RAM, Core 2 T9400 2.53GHz processor, and a 160GB hard drive - all of which cost about $2600.00 USD total. I haven't bought Fallout 3 for the PC, but it should run on high just fine.

The only bad thing I have to say about Alienware is the customer service is terrible. Great computers, but horrible customer service. And don't even get me started on their financing department. Seriously, what company doesn't let you at least check your balance online these days....

I was going to guess you paid 3000 for that customization you got on yours! I'd say what you've got would run any game out there easily! Did you opt for the XP OS or go with the Vista?
 

mALX

New member
Feb 11, 2009
560
0
0
Zeeky_Santos said:
mALX said:
If anyone has found a laptop that will play Oblivion and Fallout 3 on at least medium graphics without lag, could you please let me know? (and list the graphics, memory, hard drive, OS, etc. that comes with that laptop please?)
buy an alienware from the site. they make them exclusively for gaming as is evident by the art designs you can get on them (like the horde or alliance WoW ones).

oh yeah, and if you have $8000 AUD just laying around the place maybe you could buy me the Altech NRG Storm i7 from iBuypower.com?


Product Description:
NRG STORM i7 - Intel Core i7 965 Extreme Edition Quad Core (3.2Ghz) overclocked up to 4Ghz, High Performance Corsair 6GB 1600Mhz DDR3 Triple Kit, 2 Terabytes HDD space (RAID 0 2 x 1TB HDD), Dual Nvidia GeForce GTX 295 1792MB DDR3, Nvidia SLI Technology, Blu-Ray Burner, Dual Gigabit LAN, 7.1 HD AUDIO, Antec TruePower Quattro 1000 Watt, Extreme water cooling system, Genuine Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate, Microsoft Office Ready 2007 60 day free trial, 1 year return to base warranty.
Altech Computers NRG STORM i7 [http://www.altech.com.au/nrg/default.aspx]

Drool, drool, drool.....Awesome desktop, but over 7,200 ?? They only have desktops that I could find, and they were higher than Alienware on their prices.
 

mALX

New member
Feb 11, 2009
560
0
0
RAKtheUndead said:
Zeeky_Santos said:
No[/b] to Alienware, and I say no to that system as well.

I could self-construct a computer like that for half the price, and even then, it would be a waste of money. You don't need any Core i7 past the 920, liquid cooling is for chumps and if you do it right, you don't need a warranty. In fact, you get diminishing benefits long before the $1,200 mark.
Lol, don't worry about it, I wouldn't be able to afford either one with maxed stats. I already have a desktop that is more than adequate for playing the games at med settings, so not looking for a desktop.

Oh, I'd be interested in hearing more about what you said about the diminishing benefits of a warranty though, because unless I am buying at a place like Best Buy, I always buy an extended warranty. (at Best Buy I always buy the store warranty instead). I'd really appreciate your input on that.

Without the knowledge that you two have, I am at the mercy of the sales departments when I shop for electronics, so I appreciate any help.
 

Shath

New member
Mar 6, 2009
28
0
0
Alienware is crap. The ones that support Alienware usually haven't bought one and probably have a picture under their pillow dreaming about them, they are not good and they have failed miserably. Which might be the reason they sold out to dell. End of Story.

EDIT: Bought parts for my desktop instead. Cost substantially less. Works better than anything Alienware has to offer.
 

Wazaki

New member
Mar 5, 2009
74
0
0
Howabout this?
MSI GT627-218US NoteBook Intel Core 2 Duo P8600(2.40GHz) 15.4" Wide SXGA+ 4GB Memory 320GB HDD 7200rpm BD Combo NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS - Retail

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834152099

I recommend newegg, hella good prices.
 

mALX

New member
Feb 11, 2009
560
0
0
Zankabo said:
MisterAnarchist said:
Zankabo said:
Dell seems to have partnered with Alienware
I'm pretty sure Dell owns Alienware.

EDIT: Yep. http://www.gamespot.com/news/6146435.html
Ahh, cool, I honestly could not remember if it was partnership or buyout.
Yes, and it ruined it for me, now I feel like when I look at their offerings I am just seeing a Dell with a higher price and a pretty name.
 

NotAPie

New member
Jan 19, 2009
2,095
0
0
I wish I had a gameing laptop, -.- mine cant play garrys mod without getting a BSOD everytime something explodes near me.
or if I get shot...
DAMN thats anooying.
 

Nutcase

New member
Dec 3, 2008
1,177
0
0
Aesthetical Quietus said:
If you are talking specifically about 32 bit systems(and it sounds like you are), I'm going to have to debate you on that point. While it is true that Vista will recognise 4GB of RAM, it is limited just as XP is to 3 GB, 32 bit architecture can not use the 4th and final GB of RAM. Vista's recognition of 4GB of RAM was much hyped, but it was never to be, it handles that final RAM the same way XP does, it doesn't and allows it to passively speed your system up. [Sorry if I misinterpreted you]
While it's true that 32-bit XP and 32-bit Vista are both limited in how much memory they can use, the limit is dependent on your hardware, not a fixed 3GB. As a rule of thumb, the amount of usable RAM is 4GB, minus the amount of VRAM you have, minus a small additional amount. My 32-bit Vista box with 512MB VRAM allows me to use 3.25GB. If you had a 1GB graphics card, you couldn't fully use 3GB of RAM; SLId 1GB graphics cards, you couldn't fully use 2GB.

The price of regular DDR2 memory is insignificant now, and I think there is a potential speed benefit for having symmetric memory modules (for dual channel mode)? Finally, you might switch to a 64-bit OS in the future. All things considered, I consider getting 3GB at this point in time to be nickle and diming. If a ready-made machine configuration with DDR2 has 3GB then I expect it to cut corners on other things as well and therefore not be worth buying.
 

mALX

New member
Feb 11, 2009
560
0
0
Joos said:
No worries, I think the mobile 260 GPU is going to be a killer. No deliveries until april, but I think it will be worth waiting for.
It is like having dual graphics but on one card. The thing is, though; you can get two of the 9800 GT for 100. each, or one of the new cards for 500. I'd go for two of the old ones and save 300. Especially with a Laptop, you are looking at replacing in a couple years anyway, and by that time the old cards will most likely be phased out. I'd like to get in on the deal now while I can.


KenzS said:
I have a 18.6" Toshiba Qosmio, it can handle Fallout 3 as far as i know, but its an expensive laptop... $1600, and not too mention its so big i cant even find a bag for it!

why not just buy an xbox?
You must have missed that, lol. I have an XBox. I carry it with me everywhere, along with a 15.4" flat screen TV. Then I have to set it all up where-ever I go. A laptop would be easier, lighter, and I could also mod the games while out and about (plus pick up my email, etc.).
Bobojo11 said:
i have a Dell XPS M1730

some specs:
dual intel core 2 extreme at 2.8 GHz per core (overclocked to about 6.1 GHz total)
dual nvidia geforce m8800GTX
dual raid 0 7200 rpm HDD
4 GB ram
integrated G15 keyboard LCD
full keyboard with numpad
nice LCD screen with 1920x1200 native resolution

its a nice laptop and plays most games on max settings while running a second monitor instead of SLI. only real downsize is the size/weight and the price.

hope this helped ^_^

Thanks!

Wazaki said:
Howabout this?
MSI GT627-218US NoteBook Intel Core 2 Duo P8600(2.40GHz) 15.4" Wide SXGA+ 4GB Memory 320GB HDD 7200rpm BD Combo NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS - Retail

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834152099

I recommend newegg, hella good prices.
Thanks!
 

Aesthetical Quietus

New member
Mar 4, 2009
402
0
0
Nutcase said:
Aesthetical Quietus said:
If you are talking specifically about 32 bit systems(and it sounds like you are), I'm going to have to debate you on that point. While it is true that Vista will recognise 4GB of RAM, it is limited just as XP is to 3 GB, 32 bit architecture can not use the 4th and final GB of RAM. Vista's recognition of 4GB of RAM was much hyped, but it was never to be, it handles that final RAM the same way XP does, it doesn't and allows it to passively speed your system up. [Sorry if I misinterpreted you]
While it's true that 32-bit XP and 32-bit Vista are both limited in how much memory they can use, the limit is dependent on your hardware, not a fixed 3GB. As a rule of thumb, the amount of usable RAM is 4GB, minus the amount of VRAM you have, minus a small additional amount. My 32-bit Vista box with 512MB VRAM allows me to use 3.25GB. If you had a 1GB graphics card, you couldn't fully use 3GB of RAM; SLId 1GB graphics cards, you couldn't fully use 2GB.

The price of regular DDR2 memory is insignificant now, and I think there is a potential speed benefit for having symmetric memory modules (for dual channel mode)? Finally, you might switch to a 64-bit OS in the future. All things considered, I consider getting 3GB at this point in time to be nickle and diming. If a ready-made machine configuration with DDR2 has 3GB then I expect it to cut corners on other things as well and therefore not be worth buying.
That's merely the Service pack talking, it's not actually used. Well, so far as I've been told and learnt in any case. I'm not going to out and out deny the possibility, because I never designed Windows or anything like that. It might have something to do with the limit of 32 bit integers, no idea.
Anyways, you are correct, there is a boost for having symmetrical models, and it's not so much a boost as it is a major slow down without it.[As in if you only have 1/2 or 3/4 slots filled. My point wasn't so much that you should aim for a laptop or whatever with 3 GB of RAM, or anything like that, my point is that you'd be better off to go with an 64 bit OS, tha with a 32 bit if you are running 4 GB's of RAM, because the afore mentioned restrictions on 32 bit OS's and RAM.
 

fedpayne

New member
Sep 4, 2008
904
0
0
PROCESSOR Intel® Pentium® Dual-Core Processor T4200 (2.0GHz, 800MHz, 1MB cache)
OPERATING SYSTEM Genuine Windows Vista SP1? Home Premium (64 BIT) - English
LCD 15.6in Widescreen High Definition (1366x768) WLED with TrueLife
MEMORY 4096MB 800MHz Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM [2x2048]
HARD DRIVE 160GB (5400RPM) SATA Hard Driv
GRAPHICS CARD 256MB ATI Mobility RADEON HD 4570
Aw geez, I'm sorry y'all, but anyone who knows anything, is this good enough to play newer games such as Fallout 3, Dawn of War 2, Left 4 Dead and Episode 3 when it comes out? Is there anything I'm missing from that which would be cheaply added.

It's a Dell, and at the moment that setup will cost about £620 - essentially $1,000. Should I pull the trigger on this one? I need a laptop and want to be able to play some games.
 

mALX

New member
Feb 11, 2009
560
0
0
fedpayne said:
PROCESSOR Intel® Pentium® Dual-Core Processor T4200 (2.0GHz, 800MHz, 1MB cache)
OPERATING SYSTEM Genuine Windows Vista SP1? Home Premium (64 BIT) - English
LCD 15.6in Widescreen High Definition (1366x768) WLED with TrueLife
MEMORY 4096MB 800MHz Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM [2x2048]
HARD DRIVE 160GB (5400RPM) SATA Hard Driv
GRAPHICS CARD 256MB ATI Mobility RADEON HD 4570
Aw geez, I'm sorry y'all, but anyone who knows anything, is this good enough to play newer games such as Fallout 3, Dawn of War 2, Left 4 Dead and Episode 3 when it comes out? Is there anything I'm missing from that which would be cheaply added.

It's a Dell, and at the moment that setup will cost about £620 - essentially $1,000. Should I pull the trigger on this one? I need a laptop and want to be able to play some games.
That is exactly what my problem is. I want to be able to play ALL the upcoming Fallouts and Elder Scrolls in the series. According to what I have read, Bethesda has tweaked the Gambryo once again, and that will mean I have to have something that will handle it. These are the games I play exclusively, and they are power-sucking games! (and graphics hogs!)

(Thanks for understanding!)
 

out0v0rder

New member
Dec 16, 2008
195
0
0
This is good. [http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=9172511&type=product&id=1218043606827]

Runs TF2 1920x1200 at 71 fps.

<img src="http://out0v0der.fileave.com/nicelappy/lappy4.jpg> runs Crysis 1440x900 on High with a solid 30 fps.
 

GonzoGamer

New member
Apr 9, 2008
7,063
0
0
crimson5pheonix said:
Alienware M-15x With 2GB of RAM, an 8600GTS, and a 2.1 GHz Intel CPU. If you get the 1440x900 screen it will work, but why a laptop? A desktop is much better for gaming. If you were playing LAN party games, I could understand, but these are single player RPG's. So why?
Alienware is cool but quite overpriced. I've always found that you can find something comparable on newegg for less than half the price. It wont look as cool as an alienware but it'll do the job.