GamesB2 said:
Just in the interest of saving money you don't need a quad core.
Dual will do fine. But if you definitely want that processor and it works well then sure.
If you want to max out, quad core is becoming a requirement.
Can't comment too much. My experience is with Intel/Nvidia builds, Although I may try out an ATI if my current build dies (no particular reason, I still like Nvidia. Just to try out something new)[
/quote]
Yeah pretty much. A year ago going c2d was still a consideration, nowadays if you really want to save pennies on a gaming rig a triple core would be the bare minimum and since x3 cpus have low clock speeds, a quad core it is.
On a side note: I never understood why AMD didn't simply make faster phenonII x3 cpus.
Most modern games only fully utilize 3 cores and in many benches an x3 performs the same as a similarly clocked x4.
Smaller die size, cheaper, lower powerconsumption, less heat, more clock potential. It just makes no sense not to.