i guess that as a married gay catholic, i must put some light on this.
Ten Foot Bunny said:
cathou said:
it's doesnt matter if a civil marriage is between two men, two women or a man and a woman. it's not a gay marriage, it's just a marriage that doesnt involve God...
I'm probably being overly semantic here, but I don't think a marriage that isn't performed or blessed by a religious institution is missing a spiritual component. The spiritual aspect (or lack thereof) can be whatever the couple in question wishes it to be. I doubt that two gay Catholics would consider their marriage less blessed or, at worst, null and void because the Vatican thinks that they own the only correctly interpreted message of God, and thus refused the couple a church wedding.
i didnt meant that our marriage lack a spiritual componant, just that i wasnt bless by the Church officials. well now that i think about it, i think marriage is important to the people involve in it, not to God. i think God bless love, and doesnt really care if you are married or not...
FirstNameLastName said:
No offence to any gay Catholics that may be reading this, but i find the concept to be rather silly.
As much as i dislike religious fundamentalists preaching their hate for the LGBT community, and as much as i do like seeing the church embrace a more progressive stance, i can't really vouch for the rationality behind these sorts of middle ground religious beliefs. The Bible is rather clear in this regard, and while various contradictions about this issue do exist (just as with virtually everything else in the bible) there really isn't enough ambiguity to interpret it any other way.
Unless people are going to follow the religion but just completely disregard everything written in scripture then i don't really see how gay Catholics can be anything more than people with a bad case of cognitive dissonance who refuse to commit one way or another.
As someone who doesn't practice any religion myself i do get the idea of not wanting to be restrained by religious rules, but i honestly find religious fundamentalists to be more philosophically grounded than people who believe that their actions will condemn them to hell yet do them anyway, or people who believe in the divine word of a scripture yet discard any aspects they dislike.
i think you can declare yourself of a religion without following blindly every aspect of it. if the only catholics are those who actually go to Church every sunday, there's not much catholic left around here...
otherwise, i'm culturally catholic. I was baptised, receive the first communion and confirmation. i've even went to Church a couple of time in my life, so i see myself as a catholic.and i was catholic before i realised i was gay. and while i do not blindly follow my religion, it still have importance to me, as a tradition and in my believes.
they dont think it's acceptable to be gay, alright, but unless the pope send me a letter to tell me i'm not catholic anymore, i'll still view myself as one.
and for the sciprture, i do not believe that the true meaning of the original words are still intact after thousands of years of manual copy and changes dictate by the politics of the early Church
there's a whole world of difference to adopt the philosophy of a religion, and to follow every rules that they might have come up with over the time for political reason.
by the way, our local Church didnt had any trouble to baptised our two children even if we were gay