Then your feedback is piss poor. This section is just as much about improving people's review technique as it is discussing the games in question.blizzardwolf post=326.69513.664500 said:I don't mind hearing that if he'd said it as much. But he came to me with rude words in a rude manner, so I responded thusly. I don't go into anyone else's threads and gripe at them, then tell them what to do with them.HBrutusH post=326.69513.664488 said:That's a bit much. I think he meant that you shouldn't give an opinion in the title, instead say something like:blizzardwolf post=326.69513.663266 said:I did. Read the review and quit your bitching.
"Blizzardwolf reviews Gears of War."
The title is problematic, it makes your review look more like a rant. Especially when you have your criticisms about the story taking up a lot of space at the beginning of your piece. For the record your criticisms were valid, but far too drawn out. You do, in fact, make the same point several times over.
Aside from that your piece was good if marred with a confusing layout. Your dependence on section headers instead of free flowing prose is lazy and makes the whole review kind of stop/start which is a shame because your writing actually flows quite well.
In short. This is promising work but you've limited yourself in your choice of format.
In my opinion.