That's the common way of looking at it, but I've never agreed with that. I know my view isn't widely shared so I'm not trying to call you wrong or anything, but:JeanLuc761 said:The problem is that the punishment is completely disproportionate to the crime. If someone stole a candy bar, or even 10 candy bars from a supermarket, does that mean they deserve 20 years in jail and the complete and total loss of their future?
Sounds like somebody enjoys their illegal free music...JoshTheater said:In this particular case I'm gonna side with Anonymous. Gene Simmons sounds like a giant tool. Sue every kid who ever downloaded a song? You, sir, are an idiot, and you had this coming for making such an ass-backwards ignorant statement.
"How do you kill that which has no life?"One of Many said:Well, this is going to be interesting. Can Gene kill something deathless?
Thanks for the Fox News edition there, coming up next: How communism was the "terrorism" of the 50's.Azaraxzealot said:finally... someone's sticking up to these internet terrorists.
and im glad its Gene Simmons \m/ YEAH! ROCKERS DON'T TAKE THIS SHIT!
The key thing with Anonymous is that they prove faceless masses can do anything they put their minds to.GrinningManiac said:Good
I don't expect him to succeed, but I'll bet that it'll attract the attention of bigger people. He says the FBI are invovled, which may or may not be true.
It irritates me that a huge throng of annoying little kids and lonely 20/30-somethings think they're like frickin' Al Capone or something. I don't care for Piracy legislation either way, but I want these f*ckless morons to be shown that the real world is REAL and they aren't the most important and untouchable 'criminal masterminds' (/sarcasm) in the world