George Lucas Denies Claims That He Is Digitally Resurrecting the Dead

Iscin

Schism Navigator
Sep 8, 2009
49
0
0
The Sun is the worst "paper" in Britain, it is essentially a journalistic slut that does everything it can to get attention. I wouldn't pay any attention to this. If this story comes up on BBC News then I'll take note :p
 

N3vans

New member
Apr 14, 2009
160
0
0
Journalistically speaking 'The Sun' is down there with primordial slime. Avoid.

Besides, it's outright foolish to believe anything that Grand Overlord Murdoch says (see 'fair and balanced' Fox news).
 

Unrulyhandbag

New member
Oct 21, 2009
462
0
0
Distorted Stu said:
Source: The Sun = Instantly disregard anythign said in this article.

The sun is only good as a really poor replacement for arsewipe. Also boobies.
fixed that for you.

It has to be said that it's probably the most believable thing I've seen printed in the sun for many years.
 

Fursnake

New member
Jun 18, 2009
470
0
0
Evben if Lucas did start putting digital dead actors in movies (which would be creepy and more than a bit perverse) he could nevre actually claim that actor was in the movie or list them in the credits. They could be listed as...starring The Image of [Insert dead actor here] and [Insert voice actor here] as the voice of [Insert dead actor here]. But it would never be the actual actor in any way, shape of form, just an interpretation of the deceased.

I wouldn't put it past Lucas to do something like this.

I wouldn't put it past the Sun to lie and misrepresent the situation.

I can't decide which one I should hate on the most hehe.
 

murphy7801

New member
Apr 12, 2009
1,246
0
0
Brotherofwill said:
I didn't know dead people had rights.

The more you know....

As sensational as it sounds, it slightly makes sense to me when talking about George Lucas.
In France just because your dead doesn't mean you don't have the right to marry. The French those old romantics.
 

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
16,898
9,584
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
I don't know. I'd have to think if there was ONE line Lucas wouldn't cross, it would have to be this. If only because even he knows he can't quite bridge the Uncanny Valley... and, worse, his attempts could just dive right into its depths.

I mean, remember the creepy-as-hell CGI Orville Redenbacher commercial [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ly7Opb7TaQg]?
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,419
0
0
Fursnake said:
Evben if Lucas did start putting digital dead actors in movies (which would be creepy and more than a bit perverse) he could nevre actually claim that actor was in the movie or list them in the credits. They could be listed as...starring The Image of [Insert dead actor here] and [Insert voice actor here] as the voice of [Insert dead actor here]. But it would never be the actual actor in any way, shape of form, just an interpretation of the deceased.

I wouldn't put it past Lucas to do something like this.

I wouldn't put it past the Sun to lie and misrepresent the situation.

I can't decide which one I should hate on the most hehe.
I can help, according to the article this accusation came from a comedian. Its not hard to take a ambitous joke from some comedian then turn it into a flame war, at least not for The Sun. If this doesnt strike you as odd then ill have to consider you a lost cause to scrutinised reading. Not that it means much.
 

Jake the Snake

New member
Mar 25, 2009
1,141
0
0
*facepalm + sigh* Why do people actually believe anything that is printed on The Sun? These are the guys who said Shia LaBoof was going to be Robin in the new Batman film, despite Nolan having clearly stated there would NEVER be a Robin in his movies. It's a tabloid people.