squid5580 said:
Mutie said:
Nimbus said:
Anyone seen the film? Was it any good?
I'm afraid not... Don't get me wrong, it's a definate improvement on "Diary" but it just lacks spark and the zombies aren't nearly dead enough. In his attempt to leave behind the pressure and prejudice of the high-production film industry in favour of a more intimate and independant approach, it seems poor old George has fallen behind in the very genre he created...
I loved Diary. Sure it wasn't a Dawn or a Day or Night but it wasn't nearly as bad as Land. Or the godawful remake of Day (or Dawn I can never remember which one was which, the one with Bud). But this one was silly. At least I could relate to the characters in Diary. This was just a series of over the top zombie slayings by a bunch of morons. And can you explain to me how they got the heads on the poles? Very disappointing Romero. You completely forgot the morals and just went for laughs.
I acctually prefered Land to Diary. Land was a fairly good end to the series with the plot coming full circle: in Night it is the irrational fear of communism and insurgence, only by looking out of the window can you see the ghouls. In Dawn it's commercialism, of course. And Day is a nice shot at the military with, no doubt, the best zombies in the series. Yet in Land, the zombies have become us; there is no more warning to be made because we are one and the same and the final shot really brings it all together.
Diary on the other hand was just... eugh. A bunch of young college students in a pitiful pop at the media, which was needless as far more was said about media influence in the other films of the series.
Don't get me wrong, if you like it that's good. In many ways it's a good film... it just didn't work for me and I feel very much the same about Survival.